It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then I will have to say that you might be as dense as I am.
Originally posted by wascurious
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by wascurious
Originally posted by butcherguy
There are laws limiting trans fats in foods in NYC.
New York Times
Those laws apply to establishments that sell food.
You can have all the soda and trans fats you want, even in NYC.
So what you are telling me is that there is a law regulating what kind of fats an establishment that sells food can sell to the public?
I never said that there were not such laws.
I think you have no idea what you are arguing.
Your point? At least Democrats don't run around screaming about keeping the government out of your life, but then say it's ok to intrude into your bedroom or uterus like the republicans do.
It's the man's choice as well as the woman's. If she isn't agreeable, it is a rape.
Originally posted by wascurious
reply to post by dimmuburger
Ummm... since when do men not get to choose?
Who decides to whip his dick out and put it places?
Pretty sure that is all his choice.
Have any men that have been raped and forced to be a father?
Originally posted by butcherguy
Then I will have to say that you might be as dense as I am.
Your nanny state regulates private businesses, to the point of telling them that they can not use trans fats that are allowed to be consumed by the public. Surely you can see the folly in that, even if you can't see that it infringes on the liberty of both the businesses and the public that they serve.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by DarkKnight76
Your point? At least Democrats don't run around screaming about keeping the government out of your life, but then say it's ok to intrude into your bedroom or uterus like the republicans do.
Oh that is a priceless comment from the "stay out of my womb, but pay for my birth control" crowd.
Originally posted by butcherguy
It's the man's choice as well as the woman's. If she isn't agreeable, it is a rape.
Women have just as much choice in the matter as men do, with the exception of rape.
Are most abortions performed because a rape occurred? If that is the case, there shouldn't be much need for
late term abortions.
ETA: Here is when a man doesn't get to choose... When he is 'fingered' as being the father of a child that isn't his. There was a case in PA where a guy had DNA tests prove that he wasn't the father and the judge in the case made him continue to pay child support. The woman had the ultimate 'right to choose', she could have had an abortion. That resolves him of responsibility. What? He is responsible to pay for 18 years because the woman didn't do the right thing and have a medical procedure to remove the little tumor that she had?edit on 6-9-2012 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)
Not dense at all, just also not expecting other people be ordered to serve me thing.
One whole crazy judge made a huge mistake huh? Need a list of judges that made even stupider rulings?
Oh, just rape?
Originally posted by butcherguy
You might want to roll that over in your mind a few more times.
No one is being ordered to serve you any 'thing'.
The issue is a city that says an establishment is ordered NOT to serve you certain foods that you may like or desire. Foods that by your own admission are legal to eat, just that the establishment can't serve them to you.
No they do not. Men cannot be impregnated against their will. Women can. A biology teacher can help you from here.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by wascurious
One whole crazy judge made a huge mistake huh? Need a list of judges that made even stupider rulings?
What I gave you there is called 'an example'. Are you naive enough to think that there is only one man out there that has paid 18 years of child support for a child that wasn't his?
I will note that you didn't address the main point, that a woman has the ultimate right to choose whether she has the child or aborts the unviable tissue mass.
And I do not need people to serve me things
If the Burger King Corporation wanted to, the could be just like Olive Garden, and serve alcohol with their Whoppers. They choose not to. This thread is about choice, some that curiously vanishes under the thumb of those that pride themselves on being 'pro choice'.
Burger King cannot serve alcohol but that does not mean NYC is under prohibition.
I do believe that men paying for children that DNA proved were not theirs must be extremely rare. What number do you think one example is indicative of?
Originally posted by butcherguy
Okay, I said with the exception of rape.
Would you like to clear things up and tell us when a woman gets impregnated against her will that does not involve rape?
Please, be my biology professor!
Try not to use immaculate conception in your answer, okay?
Originally posted by butcherguy
Good for you.
Does that mean that an establishment should not be able to serve you food that isn't illegal to eat?
If the Burger King Corporation wanted to, the could be just like Olive Garden, and serve alcohol with their Whoppers. They choose not to. This thread is about choice, some that curiously vanishes under the thumb of those that pride themselves on being 'pro choice'.edit on 6-9-2012 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by butcherguy
Okay, you are a troll.
There are a lot of men out there that paid for babies that weren't their children, long before DNA tests became inexpensive.
Your numbers would indicate that you are a noobie.... But that you aren't. I suspect that you are a returning troll.
Later, done feeding you.