It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances...
The real gunman fired a shot at him. Show me ONE sane person who will run out of a room with someone shooting at them- and stops right outside the door and gets on their knees! In the victim's mind, if he stops running he will get shot.
.they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Police are trained professionals. You don't go around shooting at random people because you do not know what the "perp" looks like- especially in a hostage situation!
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....
This is called a "contradiction". If you admit they should have hesitated- and they failed to do so- that is why they are at fault.
yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?
From trained professionals? Yes I do expect less of a reaction. I expect them to assess the situation before they open fire.
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances....they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Im surprised it doesnt happen more often.
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?
Originally posted by hypervigilant
There has been threads here with post about the rejection of police officer candidates due to having too high of an IQ score.... They aren't hiring people that can reason rationally because they only expect them to react to a situation without thinking or questioning what is right or wrong... It has been ten years since I have spoken to a police officer that didn't appear to have a bad attitude and the ability to not see intelligent rational people as the enemy.
Originally posted by skalla
Reading the article, it would appear that the cops shot and killed him for not kneeling down when ordered, god bless them. i'm mad pleased that there is an ocean between me and the murderous fools some of you have the misfortune to have as police.
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances....they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Im surprised it doesnt happen more often.
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?
Originally posted by Bisman
So it is very likely at least 1 of the 3 police involved, are of these young, excited, just out of training, kids. needing to either prove his worth as a cop, or is just to green, and got easily scared.
The three Woodbury police officers who fired their weapons are on standard paid administrative leave. They are officer Anthony Ofstead, an 11-year veteran; officer Stacey Krech, who's been with the department for five years, and officer Natalie Martin, who's been with the department for two years.
Man, you have a very skewed view of right and wrong. You can't POSSIBLY believe that these clowns were trained to respond in that manner! Let's hope you or yours are never in such a situation. Unbelievable!!
Originally posted by Kastogere
reply to post by RationalDespair
I do not blame them for killing him...the conditions were right for that kind of response. They acted as they were intially trained to do.
I do think personally they should have verified the victim as a threat though, but I do not fault the reaction of the police...there is that more clear?
Maybe if he had listend to police to stop and get down....he'd still be alive. or at the very least less holy.
No contradition there...Im stating a personaly belief and backing it up with another personal belief...
They are not at fault in the bare minimum of the encounter...could they have done more? Sure....but Im not knocking the action...therefore no contradiction exists.
Any trained officer worth his friggin' SALT, could deduce, with almost CERTAINTY, that a hostage taker is NOT running outside without guns blazing. This guy can't be serious, Merinda!
Originally posted by Merinda
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances....they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Im surprised it doesnt happen more often.
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?
Yeah but it was a hostage situation. They could have at least checked to see if he was armed.
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances....they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Im surprised it doesnt happen more often.
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?
Originally posted by Kastogere
If the guy didnt comply to police orders...then yes they will shoot you in those circumstances....they heard a gun shot, the door opened....and without knowing what the perp looked like they shot him.
Im surprised it doesnt happen more often.
Honestly I dont see how the police are at fault for this...granted they should have hesitated....yet when gun fire is involved would you expect any less of a reaction?