DNC Proceeds With 2-Hour Islamic 'Jumah' Prayers After Rejecting Cardinal's Blessing (And You Won't

reply to post by guohua


You realize how frivolous this whole thread is? Conventions are national events, just because the racists of the Republican party can't recognize that there are people besides rich white men in the world doesn't mean that all the parties shouldn't.

Rather than getting upset about all these open events at the DNC you should be getting upset about all the closed door private events at the RNC that you've got to be part fo the good buddy system to join.

Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by jibeho

 

Didnt you read above, its not at the convention its in the same area as the convention. I dont see that is has anything to do with the convention at all. Its a religious rally being held at the same time.

I have read everything and sourced everything to the contrary. Please go back and read through the entire thread. This is a sanctioned event that is being lead by a Radical American born Imam who wishes to replace our govt. with a caliphate. Those are his words in black and white. He was also an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 WTC bombings as named by the US Attorney in NYC. Please read back through the thread before jumping in.... I'm starting to sound like a broken record...

reply to post by guohua


First off a good Muslim would not participate in democratic election process because a good Muslim knows that only God, the creator is the one and only law giver, not man and his foolish system of fallacy. So those who claim Islam and are a part of this DNC thing are the hypocrites of the religion and pose no problem because they are just like the rest of the idiots that think they're vote means they have a choice and it matters. Your vote and theirs means nothing, the whole process is bull #, just look how Ron Paul was treated because he wouldn't play their game. Just like all the fake Christians that go out and tell their congregations who to vote for are just manipulated fools so are these fake Muslims. They're just another group of sleeping sheeple idiots.
Second point, when are you retards going to wake up to the false flag "Islam"? Haven't you have enough evidence in the whole 9/11, OSB, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iran crap to figure out what the real terror and evil is?

Originally posted by LevelHeaded
reply to post by usernameconspiracy

 

That's what I was getting at with this event not being part of the "convention proper". Could it be sponsored by the DNC as part of events leading up to the actual convention? Who knows.

The problem I have with this is if this is an event sponsored by the DNC, why can't they just come out and say so and promote their involvement? If it's not something the DNC has a hand in, why won't the DNC make a statement to that point? As it stands now, it looks like the DNC is involved in this event somehow and are trying to hide their involvement. If the DNC is trying to hide any involvement, then why?

Here's the way it most likely is: Think of the DNC Committee the same as you would a city's Superbowl Committee. They organize events leading up to and during the Superbowl around the city. Some of those events are officially sanctioned and endorsed by the NFL, while many others are not. For example, in Dallas there was a series of concerts over the coarse of the year that were arranged by the Superbowl Committee, but had nothing to do with the NFL or the Superbowl. The week of the Superbowl, there were many big parties around the area, some hosted and endorsed by the NFL, while most were in name only and had no connection to the NFL.

That is what I think we have here. They probably went through the DNC Committee to get the space, but nothing from the actual DNC officially endorses the event as it's not a part of the actual convention.

Humanity will never be free until the last king is strangled by the entrails of the last priest.

While we debate these sideshow issues in our pretend Democracy -- drones are being bought and GM foods are going to have their labels removed.

Just remember; What does not kill you, will probably make a rat sterile.

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
The DNC really has nothing to do with this...they aren't doing this AT the DNC...they are doing this DURING the DNC...at a seperate location.

But go ahead...attempt to spread your hate and disinformation.

Why does the flyer say "Jumah at the 2012 DNC"? Obviously they have permission from the DNC to use it as a template. But we knew this about the Obama admin. Everything this admin does is leftist radical.

But I think McCain called him out on not supporting the protesting Iranian students and instead pulling with the tyrannical dictatorship. In the meantime Obama admin supported the tearing down of pro Western regimes in Egypt and other places.

I would even bet that CAIR is involved in this.

I think the Prez is a Marxist above and beyond anything else, and in that capacity would use that which he believes will remake America in the way he sees fit. He also is comfortable with the more radical aspects of religion it seems, as he did slip on that faith thing, was raised in Islamic Indonesia, and agrees with the more radical elements of Liberation Theology and his rev Wright has ties to the Nation of Islam. This was all exposed well before the election. But many people chose to listen to the hope and change rhetoric and all the platitudes, which he does very nicely.

reply to post by LevelHeaded

If the DNC is trying to hide any involvement, then why?

Yes, I'm afraid there is just enough of a degree of separation in much the same way Soros works with all the radical organizations he is involved with. But the flyer does advertise it as 2012 DNC in much the same way a sponsor would, or a vendor at a dance competition, or the tech vendors which set up booths at Technical conventions. But they still want to be associated with the Democrat Party and the Democrats are letting them do it to secure a voting bloc.

reply to post by charles1952

Unless, perhaps, you're saying that the Democrats are ashamed of it in some way, and they should be really proud of it instead. I think that position would become a Republican campaign commercial.

Because they are likely doing it as a stealth takeover, just like Fabian socialism. There are also marxist factions in Islamic radical funtions so it dovetails nicely withe the Fabian's ideals of revolutionizing and changing in whatever way they can because revolution is usually code for marxism and communism. (Exceptions to this are the Ron Paul revolution and the American Revolutionary War of course).

reply to post by rnaa


This really is too funny. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party are not the United States Government. These people are not the "State" that church needs to be seperated from. The conventions are celebrations for the candidates that will be running in an election. What happens at any convention does not effect policy or law or the running of the country. Its a party to announce a candidate and get the ball rolling for the coming elections. I am a Democrat. I am not the government. I just choose them.

Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by rnaa

 

This really is too funny. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party are not the United States Government. These people are not the "State" that church needs to be seperated from. The conventions are celebrations for the candidates that will be running in an election. What happens at any convention does not effect policy or law or the running of the country. Its a party to announce a candidate and get the ball rolling for the coming elections. I am a Democrat. I am not the government. I just choose them.

You are correct, the Party doesn't have to distance themselves from a religion....but it does say something of the Party, and that reflects on who they select as a candidate. So to me, the DNC giving the OK for this Islamic prayer session says something about the Democrat Party, and to their candidate.

reply to post by MidnightTide


And what would that be? What would that say about the DNC ?

reply to post by karen61057


Guess I will let another post answer for me:

Originally posted by jibeho

Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by jibeho

 

Didnt you read above, its not at the convention its in the same area as the convention. I dont see that is has anything to do with the convention at all. Its a religious rally being held at the same time.

I have read everything and sourced everything to the contrary. Please go back and read through the entire thread. This is a sanctioned event that is being lead by a Radical American born Imam who wishes to replace our govt. with a caliphate. Those are his words in black and white. He was also an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 WTC bombings as named by the US Attorney in NYC. Please read back through the thread before jumping in.... I'm starting to sound like a broken record...

So what does this say?

Romney might be Mr Cronyism and likely would sell his mother if the price was right, but the Democratic Party can be downright scary.

Responder 1: "It's got to be a part of the DNC because it's on the paper."

Me: "This doesn't even take place during the actual DNC."

Responder 1: "But it's on the paper."

Me: "I checked the website and there is no mention of it in the official itinerary."

Responder 1: "But it says it on the paper."

Me: "The DNC is not a trademarked name, so you can use it on your advertising."

Responder 1: "It's on the paper, so it's definitely sponsored by the DNC."


R.I.P. critical thinking. You will be missed.

Originally posted by MidnightTide

Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by rnaa

 

This really is too funny. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party are not the United States Government. These people are not the "State" that church needs to be seperated from. The conventions are celebrations for the candidates that will be running in an election. What happens at any convention does not effect policy or law or the running of the country. Its a party to announce a candidate and get the ball rolling for the coming elections. I am a Democrat. I am not the government. I just choose them.

You are correct, the Party doesn't have to distance themselves from a religion....but it does say something of the Party, and that reflects on who they select as a candidate. So to me, the DNC giving the OK for this Islamic prayer session says something about the Democrat Party, and to their candidate.

edit on 31-8-2012 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)

You raise a good point with your last remark. Just take a closer look at who the DNC chose to chair this event in Charlotte. Antonio Villaraigosa, the mayor of Los Angeles.

Antonio Villaraigosa, the mayor of Los Angeles who was featured on the June 2009 cover of Los Angeles Magazine with the one-word caption, “Failure,” is the chairman of the upcoming Democratic National Convention. The obvious reason is that the Obama administration, which views ethnic communities as separate fiefdoms to cultivate, is targeting the Latino community. And in the separatist prism through which they view the country, it’s only natural that they should pick Villaraigosa, whose entire career started with an extremist Latino group.

Villaraigosa, whose original name was Tony Villar, entered UCLA as a transfer student from East Los Angeles Community College in 1972. He joined the UCLA chapter of Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA), and was leading it by 1974. MEChA is an Hispanic separatist organization that encourages anti-American activities and civil disobedience. The radical members of MEChA who refer to themselves as "Mechistas," romanticize Mexican claims to the "lost Territories" of the Southwestern United States -- a Chicano country called Aztlan. As head of the UCLA chapter, Villar called on the Chicano Studies Center (CSC) Director Rudolfo ‘Rudy’ Alvarez to resign from his post, accusing him of “trying to alter the concept behind Chicano studies.”

See a pattern with the DNC as a whole??

In 2001, during the 2001 campaign for Los Angeles mayor, Villaraigosa was asked at the final mayoral debate if he still adhered to MEChA’s goals, and refused to give a direct yes or no answer.

As mayor he has used patronage to keep his friends in jobs where they can help him reach power to implement his long-term goals.

Villaraigosa said of Mitt Romney earlier this summer, "I think it's pretty clear that he has amnesia.” But the one who’s pretending to have amnesia is Villaraigosa; his past radicalism is the nasty undercurrent in every move he makes.

www.breitbart.com...

Radicals and radical associations are the norm!!!!

How bout we all pray at home and keep God out of government.

Almost all of the world's problems arise from religion in government.

The OP makes claims about radicla Muslims etc.....
As if there are no radical Christians.

All religions are the problem, not just evil mooslimz

baaaa

baaaaa

baaa


thats right, lap it up. "we" are better than "they" are

baaa

baaaaa

Originally posted by spinalremain
How bout we all pray at home and keep God out of government.

Almost all of the world's problems arise from religion in government.

The OP makes claims about radicla Muslims etc.....
As if there are no radical Christians.

All religions are the problem, not just evil mooslimz

Well... You're in Luck. The DNC is removing all mentions of "God" from its official platform.

While Barack Obama is mentioned by name over 100 times, God is no longer part of the Democratic Party platform, CBN reported Tuesday.

In 2008, the party platform read:

We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.

But that plank has been rewritten to remove the phrase "God-given."

Guess people can just praise Obama instead no surprise here

In an article at Breitbart.com, Mike Flynn said that Obama's name is the most mentioned term in the platform.

"The collective voice of millions of Democrats across the country have been reduced to 'whatever Obama says,'" he wrote.

"Out of the 40 pages that make up the platform, Obama is cited by name on 38 of them. He is cited over 200 times throughout the document. The Democrat party's platform is really Obama's campaign manifesto," Flynn added.

www.examiner.com...

Leaving out God will be a big mistake. Plenty of Dems are still Christians.....

reply to post by jibeho


Is anyone even WATCHING this convention? Nobody has any input about the first night's speakers?

I'm shocked. Shame, ATS!

reply to post by QueSeraSera


Is Michelle Obama still proud of her country, or was the first time the last time?