It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Anyhow, here's a nice shot of him in the studio, complete with Photoshop flag and NO SHADOW.
Shame on you NASA.
Originally posted by TheCaucasianAmerican
reply to post by denver22
Oh but that photo was photoshopped in the 60's to convince the masses that they are there.
You do know that's why computers were made for. Haha
Its a joke ain't it?
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Anyhow, here's a nice shot of him in the studio, complete with Photoshop flag and NO SHADOW.
Shame on you NASA.
Shame on you for not using a higher resolution source.
Here's a high res version of AS11-40-5874
Here is a cropped version below. You can make out the thin shadow of the flag pole which I've highlighted, but due to the uneven surface, it's hard to see completely. The shadow of the flag itself would be out of frame due to the low sun angle.
Also, photoshop didn't come around till about 1990 (and was limited to B&W).
Originally posted by Puck 22
As the very first reply pointed out the total exposure was less than 4 hours total.
Think about it. How dangerous would a four hour chest x-ray be? Harmless right?
And while experts had claimed the astronauts would need anywhere from 3 to 8 feet of lead to protect them, the thin walls of the command module would also contain a great deal of plastic (wiring, cables, etc) which must have counted for something.
And why would they fake it? What possible motive would they have?
To even suggest different would be to imply that our government would lie to us and now you're getting silly.
Originally posted by r2d246
check this out...
Definitely needs to be seen, showing the rest of what I posted about the moon landing
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Thanks all.
I'm not going to bother posting the amount of photos I have on this subject as I have dome it in lots of other moon hoax threads,
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Thanks all.
I'm not basing my thoughts on the back of two photo's. There a literally hundreds of them that point out anomalies such as cross hairs behind objects, same scenery in different photo's (Um the moon lander could not move around the moon once landed!) Rocks with letters on them? The Moon lander looked like a kid had made it out of paper, foil and 100 mile an hour tape. Last and really not least, the odd light sources where it should be completely dark....the rocks in the foreground are, so why not the other objects on the set?
I'm not going to bother posting the amount of photos I have on this subject as I have dome it in lots of other moon hoax threads, but Google them and supply evidence why they are not faked? There's a nice little exercise for you?
But thanks for the input. Also, I am fully aware Photoshop was not around in the 60's but thanks for your sarcastic response anyway
Cheers
CB
I'm not going to bother posting the amount of photos I have on this subject as I have dome it in lots of other moon hoax threads, but Google them and supply evidence why they are not faked? There's a nice little exercise for you?
Originally posted by r2d246
check this out...
Definitely needs to be seen, showing the rest of what I posted about the moon landing
posted in a different thread hereedit on 28-8-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by krs678
Hi there people
I have just one question if some body could enlighten me as to how nasa managed to send astronauts through the Van Allen radiation belt without them becoming fatally radiated ? I ask this question as its quoted in several documentaries as a significant hurdle in manned space travel outside a 1000miles radius of earth. thanks fa ya time