It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
So an unborn child infringes on a womans rights by existing?
The Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution guarantees individuals the right to personal autonomy, which means that a person's decisions regarding his or her personal life are none of the government's business. That right, which is part of the right to privacy, encompasses decisions about parenthood, including a woman's right to decide for herself whether to complete or terminate a pregnancy, as well as the right to use contraception, freedom from forced sterilization and freedom from employment discrimination based on childbearing capacity.
A man has been charged with the murder of a heavily pregnant woman and the killing of her unborn baby girl.
Tony McLernon, 23, has been accused of killing 20-year-old Eystna Blunnie, who was found fatally injured in a street in Harlow, Essex in the early hours of Wednesday morning.
He also faces a charge of child destruction after it emerged that Ms Blunnie was heavily pregnant at the time of her death.
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... fc
Originally posted by olaru12
The adoption agencies are full of unwanted kids. When the pro life people start adopting them; then their
argument might have some validity. Until then let women make their own reproductive decisions.
Even conservative women don't want MEN making their bodies properties of the state and regulated by governmental edicts and rules.
See the GOP hypocrisy here?
edit on 23-8-2012 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)