It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by lightmeup04
There are probably rouge planets outside our galaxy close enough to keep orbiting our galaxy. We know enough about or solar system to know that if God did create it? God did so, in a matter that would take about 4.5 billion years.
We have actually observed new stars form and can even observe disks of dust around them that eventually become planets.
Literally this kind of thing happens every day, about 40 light years from here there is a solar system that has nothing but asteroids. In about another 4 billion years that solar system, will have planets, hopefully one that can harbor life similar to ours.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by lightmeup04
reply to post by chr0naut
That is great, you are good at using others material. Have you ever had a free thought in your mind? Maybe something you thought of on your own? You remind me of a force feeder. You should try thinking for yourself once in awhile. It does feel good by the way. Instead of feeding us the same old garbage from someone else's words. Please.....if you have something to say, tell us something we don't already know!! Your main stream science is getting shattered as we write.
Lightmeup04
Originally posted by lightmeup04
reply to post by chr0naut
Who made anything up? Everything I have stated has just as much value as to what you were told. Who did tell you what you know? Who says they are right? Because someone published something or its common sence? Can you tell me for certain that everything you were told and believe to be true? That is the funniest sh#t that I can't seem to wrap my head around. Someone told you so!! Like I said....give me some of your own thought instead of something someone told you to be true. This is the exact reason why we are stuck where we are. No thought of our own. Just a force feeder!!
Lightmeup04
Originally posted by Xtrozero
reply to post by chr0naut
To add to your post...
The universe started out as mostly hydrogen (element 1) atoms with some Helium (element 2) atoms. Gravity pulled this into clouds that continued to get pulled into massive dense clouds. The mass of these clouds caused the hydrogen to fission and so we had massive stars with very short life spans. As these massive stars went super nova all the other elements were made.
One may ask why is their more iron in the universe than gold, and the answer is iron is formed very early in the process and gold happen in a very short period of time during the super nova. Once the universe became more stable with 92 elements gravity caused these super nova remnants once again to form into dense clouds and smaller suns like ours were formed with planets forming too with the other heavier elements. Jupiter is actually a failed star that never reached the size for fission to happen, so stars and planets are formed all the time in a never ending cycle. Stars are much more massive than planets and so the Gravity of stars keep the planets around them.
Although no supernova has been observed in the Milky Way since 1604, supernovae remnants indicate that on average the event occurs about once every 50 years in the Milky Way. They play a significant role in enriching the interstellar medium with higher mass elements. Furthermore, the expanding shock waves from supernova explosions can trigger the formation of new stars.
The remnant of a supernova explosion consists of a compact object and a rapidly expanding shock wave of material. This cloud of material sweeps up the surrounding interstellar medium during a free expansion phase, which can last for up to two centuries. The wave then gradually undergoes a period of adiabatic expansion, and will slowly cool and mix with the surrounding interstellar medium over a period of about 10,000 years.
The Big Bang produced hydrogen, helium, and traces of lithium, while all heavier elements are synthesized in stars and supernovae. Supernovae tend to enrich the surrounding interstellar medium with metals—elements other than hydrogen and helium.
These injected elements ultimately enrich the molecular clouds that are the sites of star formation. Thus, each stellar generation has a slightly different composition, going from an almost pure mixture of hydrogen and helium to a more metal-rich composition. Supernovae are the dominant mechanism for distributing these heavier elements, which are formed in a star during its period of nuclear fusion. The different abundances of elements in the material that forms a star have important influences on the star's life, and may decisively influence the possibility of having planets orbiting it.
The kinetic energy of an expanding supernova remnant can trigger star formation due to compression of nearby, dense molecular clouds in space. The increase in turbulent pressure can also prevent star formation if the cloud is unable to lose the excess energy.
Evidence from daughter products of short-lived radioactive isotopes shows that a nearby supernova helped determine the composition of the Solar System 4.5 billion years ago, and may even have triggered the formation of this system. Supernova production of heavy elements over astronomic periods of time ultimately made the chemistry of life on Earth possible.
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by lightmeup04
There are probably rouge planets outside our galaxy close enough to keep orbiting our galaxy. We know enough about or solar system to know that if God did create it? God did so, in a matter that would take about 4.5 billion years.
We have actually observed new stars form and can even observe disks of dust around them that eventually become planets.
Literally this kind of thing happens every day, about 40 light years from here there is a solar system that has nothing but asteroids. In about another 4 billion years that solar system, will have planets, hopefully one that can harbor life similar to ours.
Any thoughts?
Rogue - Definition, The Free Dictionary
Rouge - Definition, The Free Dictionary
Sorry the Grammar-Nazi in me sought expression.
edit on 20/8/2012 by chr0naut because: I had visions of planets in makeup doing the Can-Can!
The earliest lumps of mass that clumped together weren't all in stable orbits. Many orbits were unstable and that's how protoplanet Thea crashed into Earth and formed the Earth's moon according to the most popular theory of how the moon formed. The 8 planets which remain in stable orbits are what's left after as many as 20-100 infant planets formed in all kinds of orbits.
Originally posted by jiggerj
But as the planets first formed, how could they have been orbiting the sun? What gave them the speed in the beginning to keep them in a stable orbit?
Here's a video of the clumping process starting, found by an astronaut:
Originally posted by Kashai
Its like "dust bunnies," they formed on there own.
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by jiggerj
gravitational pull is proportional to the mass of the objects
and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them (inverse square law) so small objects in a ring of dust may be to be more attracted to each other than they are to the sun these gather and condense into the planets (denser particles being closer to the sun and lighter ones being further away)
the dust itself is already in orbit before the planets are even formed (i think thats what youre missing)