What threw the planets around the sun?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:02 PM by CynicalDrivel
Basic Astronomy

Creationistic viewpoint: (Why? Because this group has an issue with the theories, and considering some of the Exoplannets, I can see why.)
Retrograde plannets.
Exoplanets don't fit the theories, all the time.
edit on 20-8-2012 by CynicalDrivel because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:04 PM by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by jiggerj


Maybe it is not 'what' but who

Seriously though, could it be the strength of the suns gravity?


reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:24 PM by shadowplaya
The way I see it is, unless you can prove me wrong, then I am correct. And the same goes for the god post, unless I can prove that incorrect. It is also true.

The fact is:
-Everything orbits something whether it be stars, galaxy clusters, black holes, planets. whatever
en.wikipedia.org...
-Space has no friction ( in general, because interstellar dust does in fact cause very very minute friction)
en.wikipedia.org...
-Nothing in the universe is stationary. Everything is moving. In orbit, as well as rotation.
-The force that acted upon these objects to get them moving had to be huge. Unimaginable huge GOD huge. EXPLOSION huge.
www.ugcs.caltech.edu... <- Big bang belief
www.everystudent.com... <- God creation belief
edit on 20-8-2012 by shadowplaya because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:28 PM by Kashai
reply to post by lightmeup04




A rogue planet — also known as an interstellar planet, nomad planet or orphan planet — is a planetary-mass object which has either been ejected from its system or was never gravitationally bound to any star, brown dwarf or other such object, and that therefore orbits the galaxy directly.


en.wikipedia.org...

Again the issue is Gravity...

Any thoughts?


reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:49 PM by lightmeup04
reply to post by Kashai



The way I see it....rouge planets at some point in their journey should be pulled in by something as a star or even a giant gas planet. We are still to young to comprehend what our solor system or our universe has in store for us. I believe sol is not done capturing what we see to exist.

Lightmeup04


reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 09:56 PM by sirhumperdink
reply to post by jiggerj



think rings of saturn
gravitational pull is proportional to the mass of the objects and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them (inverse square law) so small objects in a ring of dust may be to be more attracted to each other than they are to the sun these gather and condense into the planets (denser particles being closer to the sun and lighter ones being further away)
the dust itself is already in orbit before the planets are even formed (i think thats what youre missing)


reply posted on 20-8-2012 @ 10:07 PM by chr0naut
reply to post by jiggerj



After and during the big bang expansion, there was a great formless cloud of separate particles, spread throughout the universe - they were pretty much all Hydrogen atoms or sub-atomic and they were moving over the Higgs field. Most particles felt resistance (more or less) to movement relative to this field, those particles that didn't we call Photons and we call this light.

Due to the formless, foamy and random nature of the cloud, some areas of particles changed their angular velocity towards others through weak gravitation to the largest mass differential and since their energies were diffuse enough so that they no longer pushed each other apart, they began clumping.

This clumping of mass caused the distortion of space-time that we call gravitation. The greater the mass, the more it affects the curvature of space-time, the more curved space-time the greater the change to the angular momentum of matter.

This gravitation also gave rise to resonances which could occur between the clumps. In this way there were preferred distances of clumps between each other, relative to their mass and motion.

Not only did these clumps get bigger, but larger clumps attracted other large clumps. This happened while all the clumps were in motion with respect to each other. Each clump moving in different directions in 3D space. In some clumps, this constant motion caused some masses to fall, not directly towards each other, but in spirals and orbits. Some orbits were such that they would not decay.

And still the clumps grew, sweeping up all they could reach and adding to their masses. Until the intervening spaces were largely swept clean and all that remained were the clumps whose orbits were stable.

Some of the clumps gained enough mass that, at their cores the gravitation forced the hydrogen atoms together in fours at such pressure that they lost a little energy and turned into two Helium atoms. This process of fusion was repeated in the more massive clumps producing heavier and heavier elements from the Hydrogen atoms.

At some stage, in the most massive stars/clumps the radiative process caused by the fusion of these elements came to and end and suddenly all that explosive extra energy that was holding them outwards from their cores, stopped. They began to collapse under their own phenomenal weight. Sometimes they just collapsed into neutron stars and began the process of cooling. In others, the collapse triggered new atomic ignition which blew part of the star's matter out into space as yet another atomic cloud, this time containing heavier elements. In some stars this process repeated over and over. Some finished, collapsed into Black Holes, but others completely exploded into gas that would add to the cloud.

Meanwhile, the gravitation of the existing clumps continued to sweep space clean of all the new star stuff and sometimes whole new clumps came about from the exploded star remains. And still the clumping process goes on.

Sometimes even relatively large clumps are perturbed out of place and can be re-captured in other orbits around other clumps.

And so we now see stars, planets, moons, meteors and comets in our local vicinity and we call it the Solar System. Those clumps in non-decaying orbits are still there, the rest are mostly gone.


edit on 20/8/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags
89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags
Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags
Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags
Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags
NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags