It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by jiggerj
This clumping of mass caused the distortion of space-time that we call gravitation. The greater the mass, the more it affects the curvature of space-time, the more curved space-time the greater the change to the angular momentum of matter.
This gravitation also gave rise to resonances which could occur between the clumps. In this way there were preferred distances of clumps between each other, relative to their mass and motion.
Originally posted by jiggerj
The infant planets with little mass and all that dust should have fallen right into the sun. Yes? No?
Originally posted by jiggerj
The dust cloud couldn't have been orbiting the sun fast enough to keep from falling into it.
Originally posted by shadowplaya
well the big bang, was an explosion sending everything off into every direction. When larger objects like stars got close enough to smaller objects like rocks planets, etc. they just "attracted" them with great vast amounts of gravity. and the objects rotated around the larger ones. And since space has no friction, they keep moving forever. unless they hit another object.
and that works for pretty much every object in space.
moons orbit planets
planets orbit suns(stars)
Stars in multiple star systems (binaries, trinaries, etc) orbit their common center of mass.
galaxys orbit (black holes and galaxy cluters)edit on 20-8-2012 by shadowplaya because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by jiggerj
This clumping of mass caused the distortion of space-time that we call gravitation. The greater the mass, the more it affects the curvature of space-time, the more curved space-time the greater the change to the angular momentum of matter.
This gravitation also gave rise to resonances which could occur between the clumps. In this way there were preferred distances of clumps between each other, relative to their mass and motion.
Exactly! Even before our sun ignited, it had gathered all of its mass, causing the full space-time curve that we know and love today. Yet, this full curve was there when the planets were still forming, still small. So:
Why didn't all of the dust and rock and ice in the solar system fall into the sun? Why didn't the baby-sized planets fall into the sun?
The dust cloud couldn't have been orbiting the sun fast enough to keep from falling into it.
Originally posted by lightmeup04
Well someone will come along with a perfect scientific explanation but in all reality, I believe no one really has proof of how planets are formed. It is all theories and speculation. Gravity, mass and velocity I am sure play a key role but then again we do have rouge planets wondering around. Something had to give...which was it?
Lightmeup04
Originally posted by Anthony1138
reply to post by jiggerj
Lots of rocks and junk, the young solar system was a violent one indeed, planets smashing and stuff, the original velocity was the supernova that created the gas and dust in the first place.
I assume you are an american who has been denied basic logic, it truly is a crime denying people basic knowledge.
Originally posted by chr0naut
I think that what JiggerJ was hinting at was the celestial mechanics that could cause the orbital rotations from a perceived "static" background.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by jiggerj
The infant planets with little mass and all that dust should have fallen right into the sun. Yes? No?
Look at the motion of the dust that formed the planets in the last link in my post above and you can see the dust was already in orbit around the sun. This doesn't mean some dust and planets didn't get pulled into the sun...that may have happened with some early protoplanets. It was a chaotic process as suggested by simulations and other evidence.
Originally posted by jiggerj
The dust cloud couldn't have been orbiting the sun fast enough to keep from falling into it.
Here is a simulation to show you how some stuff did fall into the star, including a large planet, but other planets still formed that didn't:
Planetary System Formation Simulation (200 AU View)
edit on 21-8-2012 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
Originally posted by Soloro
Sometimes I wonder if some greatly intelligent being(s) 'made' this solar system. The mathematics are too precise. The planetary positions and sizes are about as mathematically interesting as the Great Pyramid. Something to consider, no?