It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats a ridiculas comparison, Iraq was a country with a population of 26 million and a land mass half the size of Texas no nukes no satalites and a military comprised of second hand Russian hardware from the 50s and 60s.
The USA has a population of 350 million a land mass that covers 10% of the world with the most up to date military hardware on the planet also add the fact that Canada would join the US in defence if war was declared..........Logisictly it would be beyond impossible to take the US and Canada.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by auraelium
Thats a ridiculas comparison, Iraq was a country with a population of 26 million and a land mass half the size of Texas no nukes no satalites and a military comprised of second hand Russian hardware from the 50s and 60s.
The USA has a population of 350 million a land mass that covers 10% of the world with the most up to date military hardware on the planet also add the fact that Canada would join the US in defence if war was declared..........Logisictly it would be beyond impossible to take the US and Canada.
And what equipment will America have after our infrastructure is crippled from nuclear strikes?
100,000 US troops invaded a country of 26 million (Iraq)….that’s less than 1 half of 1% of the population. Even if you double for an attack on the US that’s only 3.5 million troops. There are as many as 3 million in China’s military alone!!
“One of his assignments was to find places to hide nuclear suitcase bombs inside the U.S.A. You can read about it in his book, Through the eyes of the enemy.
“Colonel Lunev personally told me that the Russians were bringing nuclear, biological and chemical weapons into the U.S.A throughout the 1970s and 80s by smuggling them over the Mexican border.
I would finf it hard to believe that if there were that many nukes smuggled into the US that some would not have been found or detected and isotope tests would immediately identify them as Russian made...you think that Russia would risk that?
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Makes sense to me. We were doing the same thing, according to Richard Marcinko, during the exact same time all over europe and russia. We had hidden caches where we would keep things like suitcase nukes too. Our goal was to blow up all the major highway over passes to prevent a Warsaw invasion of Europe in the event of the next major war.
He also goes on to speculate that on occasion the nukes would go missing when the caches were periodically checked. The idea of russian sleeper cells is not too far fetched. Them coming through mexico. Probably didn't even have to go through that much trouble why not just come in any one of our major airports.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
There seems to be much confusion on this issue of Nuclear force dispositions. I hate to say this for the people who are convinced the United States is still in the position we once were...and not even that long ago, but we aren't the same country right now and we aren't in a position to pick these fights. Not right now we're not.
The source here is the Federation of American Scientists. They were founded in 1945 and have been tracking everything related to anything Nuclear ever since. They're pretty much the top for authority on these things where we aren't calling a Government phone number, in my opinion. Here are the numbers they have on force comparison:
Federation of American Scientists - Nuclear Force Strength by Nation and System
On the website they are detailed enough to show which weapons type and specific systems that are either declared by the treaties or suspected in the case of Israel. (It's on the site there to the right of the capture cut off)
I think the most surprising thing is where a good % of their (Russian) warheads are based. Ummm... Hell... No wonder they don't much care about our Stealth technology. Why should they?? If they guess within a couple miles, they got the target. They have over 600 SA-10's for declared nuclear forces. Now THAT is what I call a no kidding version of air defense! We just have the puny little patriot batteries with chemical explosive. I feel so inferior.
* Oh... I figured I'd drop this by as well. It's a list with linked description of every nuclear weapons system the United States has developed. There are a few "Atomic Munition Demolition" class weapons and they are in the 100-200 lb range as portable nuclear weapons...but portable is relative as it takes two guys from what I've read and the chart shows no active ones in service. The last ones showed retiring in the 80's I believe.
U.S. Nuclear Weapons - Historic Catalog w/ Descriptions and Specsedit on 19-8-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: Added Link
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by auraelium
I'll accept that when you have a link that counters it. Until then, FAS is respected as being knowledgeable in the area they make it their life to focus on. Sources work... Opinions ..well... I'll just be happy to see the chart with corrected numbers you refer to.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Russia and China both have a vested intrerest in the US remaining a great power. [...] Do they want the US gone? No. [...] Life is cheaper, easier, and safer for both Russia and China with the US as top dog. [...] And I will not even get into how silly the idea of the so called invasion is, common sense should make that clear.
Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
In mid-December 2011, Lt. Gen. Sergey Karakayev, commander of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces (SMF), stated that 86 new SS-27 Mod. 1 (Topol-M) and SS-27 Mod. 2 (RS-24) missiles at that time made up 28 percent of Russia’s deployed ICBM force (Star TV, 2011). If his numbers are accurate, it indicates that Russia currently deploys approximately 322 ICBMs with nearly 1,090 warheads.
Strategic Submarines
The number and breakdown of Russia’s active nuclear submarine fleet has been relatively constant for several years: six Delta IVs and three Delta IIIs that can carry a combined 144 SLBMs with up to 528 warheads.
The Russian navy plans to build up to eight Borey-class SSBNs, each equipped with 16 SS-N-32 (Bulava) SLBMs that can carry up to six warheads apiece.
Russian SSBNs conducted five strategic deterrent patrols in 2011. For the past decade, Russia has not run continuous at-sea deterrent patrols but instead deployed SSBNs on training patrols. However, from mid-2012, according to the Russian Navy, Russia “will resume constant patrolling of the world’s oceans by strategic nuclear submarines”
Strategic Bombers
The bomber fleet is capable of carrying a total of 820 nuclear weapons, but the aircraft do not carry nuclear weapons under normal circumstances. We estimate that Russia stores only a couple of hundred warheads at bomber bases, as the US bomber fleet does, with the balance having been moved to central storage facilities.
Russia has begun design studies of a new strategic bomber that may emerge as a prototype by the early 2020s. The new aircraft would replace Tu-160 and Tu-95MS heavy bombers as well as the Tu-22M3 nuclear-capable, medium-range bomber
Non Strategic (Tactical) Nuclear Weapons
We estimate that Russia’s tactical air forces are assigned 730 AS-4 air-to-surface missiles and bombs; Tu-22M (Backfire) intermediate-range bombers can deliver both the missiles and bombs, whereas Su-24 (Fencer) and Su-34 (Fullback) fighter-bombers deliver bombs only. Russia is modernizing some of its Fencers, but the aircraft will be replaced by Su-34 (Fullback) fighter-bombers; deployment of the Fullback has started at bases in the western Russia. Some other aircraft may also have a nuclear capability.
The approximately 660 warheads assigned to Russia’s naval nonstrategic delivery platforms are for cruise missiles, antisubmarine weapons, anti-air missiles, torpedoes, and depth bombs. Russia’s first new Severodvinsk-class (Yasen-class) nuclear-powered attack submarine is conducting sea-trials before entering operations with the Russian navy.
Source For Above Reports
Russia maintains air-defense and antiballistic missile forces that we estimate are allocated around 430 warheads. The warheads are used in Gazelle antiballistic missile interceptors around Moscow and in part of the S-300/S-400 air-defense system.
Damn it ! Am I going to have to subscribe
to a Gerald Celente news letter to find out
if the USA has been Red Dawned?
Wouldn't I notice on my own?
No offense Seabag as one Sea Texan to another,
But you offered a choice in your title.
I say Hoax.