It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by W3RLIED2
I'm also up for a blind debate. Anytime.
Can beez and I debate Starwars vs Star Trek, though? we were pretty stoked on that and it never got set up...
It's kind of a gaff, but it should be pretty fun! Especially considering how badly Yoda would wreck any of the Trekkies...
Originally posted by Domo1
Originally posted by W3RLIED2
I'm also up for a blind debate. Anytime.
Can beez and I debate Starwars vs Star Trek, though? we were pretty stoked on that and it never got set up...
It's kind of a gaff, but it should be pretty fun! Especially considering how badly Yoda would wreck any of the Trekkies...
This would make me very happy. The thing shouldn't always be serious. Yoda would destroy ALL of the Trekkies. Set phasers to what? Impossible? Star Wars!
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by GAOTU789
I second Druid in saying that three posts for a debate is simply not enough space. While any longer debate can be time consuming, it is the amount of space that is needed in order to adequately state your case and argue against your opponent.
To shorten to only three posts means that the debates themselves will be severely lacking.edit on 18-8-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)