It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
If they're preparing for civil war against the American people, who will be using the rounds? The only way the government can fight the people for more than a week or two, is if they bring in foreign troops, and foreign troops have their own ammo. If they are planning to use Federal Troops, then they're effectively buying millions of rounds of ammunition that will wind up being used against them, LOL! The military will side with the uprising after a few weeks when they realize the government is corrupt. Local law enforcement will be split pretty evenly on both sides at first, but they'll be so out-gunned, that they'll have to come around to the side of the uprising or be killed quickly.
So, these millions of rounds had better be for training, because anything else would be counter-productive to their intentions. It would be nice of them to buy us all that ammo though!
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Somewhere above 220,000 employees fall under the purview of DHS. Some are going to be support and admin of course, but a billion rounds is only about 4 rounds per employee.
Say only 25% of the employee force has to qualify with weapons, that is still 60,000 people. 50 rounds of practice per year per person, and about 10 in a magazine to carry on duty, and you have a need for 600,000 hollow points, and 3 million practice rounds each year. Hopefully the ones that really are in the mix are shooting a lot more than 50 rounds of training per year, so the numbers published seem just about right.
As far as hollow points being banned by the Geneva Convention.... that was a stupid move. We use hollow points because it gives more knockdown power and less chance of pass-through to unintended targets. A practice round would actually be MORE DANGEROUS in a LEO or domestic situation, because you might hit someone behind your intended target, or ricochet and hit just about anyone. I use an "extreme frangible" in my carry guns, because it is even more dangerous to the intended target, and less dangerous to everyone else. Air Marshall's supposedly use something similar to avoid damaging and airplane if they have to fire it onboard.
edit on 13-8-2012 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)edit on 13-8-2012 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Some will argue that you should "train" with the same round that you will carry in your duty magazines. Expensive and unnecessary as long as you shoot the same weight methinks.
Originally posted by milkyway12
At the firing range, using issued rounds, it is not uncommon for me to go through 400 - 600 rounds every other day, by myself.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Sorry but that is closer to 4500 rounds per employee (over 4 per us citizen tho).
In April, the DHS first published a solicitation “for commercial leaded training ammunition (CLTA) of various calibers for law enforcement officer firearms training courses” to be used at facilities in the states of Georgia, New Mexico, Maryland and South Carolina, as well as other unnamed DHS offices across the country. At the time the DHS demanded hundreds of thousands of test rounds for an array of ammunition types, including 209,000 rounds of #00 buckshot 8-pellet bullets for 12 gauge guns and more than 2 million shots for a .357 Sig Caliber. With their solicitation set to expire in less than a week, though, the DHS has taken it upon themselves to answer questions from contractors interested in their very pricey proposal.
In the latest amendment, published online over the weekend, the DHS answers such pressing questions as, say, “Would a 223 Rem 64Grain soft point round be acceptable?” in response to their initial request for 1.1 million rounds of .223 Rem Caliber 62.64 Grain JHP. (And, if you’re wondering, the official DHS-authored answer is, “Yes, that would be acceptable.”)
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Yes and if the actual % of DHS employees that carry a .40 calibre handgun is say 30% (the rest being administrative staff, etc) then that # is over 3x as much (over an est 15,000 rounds per carrying DHS personnel)!!! Maybe they will use this round for the civilian inmate camps and maybe Obama is about to create the National Defense Force that he talked about during the last campaign. The # of rounds suggests that he will hire a lot (TSA on steroids....I wonder if they will be issued "brown shirts"??).
Leaded ammo vs lead free just signifies the type of projectile. A leaded projectile is either a solid lead composite, or will be a jacketed lead projectile. A lead free projectile will be composed of a combination of lead free components such as steel core and copper jacket, solid copper, and compressed powder jacketed. I can assure that it is 100% live ammunition and capable of firing.
Leaded ammo is significantly less expensive than lead free, which is probably why they chose it for the training ammo. I am surprised though that they haven't switched entirely to lead free ammunition because of the health hazards involved in breathing the lead dust from leaded projectiles. This is why some ranges now ban the use of leaded projectiles completely.