It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by magma
reply to post by ReAwakened
So if you are a realist you will be able to support your claims with evidence
- I am not seeing any of that... Evidence
Is that because you are also part of the so called elites? Shrouded in secrecy, talking in riddles.
So in the past, this place was volcanically active, probably with geezers and such close by.
Originally posted by WhereAreWe7
I noticed below the pics on NASA's site there is a "full resolution" option. When i click it, the pic stays the same size but just open in a new tab. Are the photos seriously the size of a 90's flip phone pic? If so, you would think with billions of dollars invested in this, they could at least get a better camera on the damn thing, and maybe give us some more views of what the actual land looks like at a distance, rather than uploading like 100 pics of the ground. just my two cents
Originally posted by th3onetruth
reply to post by DjangoPhat
Whether or not it was planned out before hand. The way the information is released and how, is slowly diffusing the shooting. I am sure I have read it in a psychology book in high-school, I believe it is called Classical conditioning. Now I could be wrong, admitting right now. I will look at it while at work but it will take a little bit.
Classical Conditioning
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
reply to post by ReAwakened
Ok I'll bite.
Using your own logic, I KNOW NASA is telling the truth, and all that they say should be taken as 'gospel'. I don't need any evidence for this, I just know, just like you can't prove that love exists, you know it does.
So tell me how your argument is better than mine, using your logic?