It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigcountry08
reply to post by SuperFrog
dosen't what we know of animal breeding kind of screw with this theory, if two diffrent animal species mate then the offspring is usually (except for very rare occasions) sterile. So it would almost be impossible for two diffrent species of "early human" to reproduce multiple young and have them all be fertile. Unless they originated from the same primate and just evolved diffrently along the way and then remet back up to do the deed.
Originally posted by rickymouse
Ahhh...Humans are just mutts. Our Ancestors humped anything with two feet.....sometimes even four
Originally posted by SuperFrog
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Really? Garbage?
At least in science it is easy, you have to prove your theory, and Dr. Svante Paabo has done that, proving that large part of humans have about 2.5% of Neanderthals genes. Early on this topic I posted link for his Ted Talk from year ago, and as far as I know, it is not proven wrong. If you have something in particualr, please post it and we can talk about it. Calling someones life work garbage just lowers quality of discussion on ATS.
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by CaptainBeno
How do they know it existed 2 million years ago?? Is that a ball park or an actual figure or because they fitted in to go with the other species and their dates?? how were the other species dated??
Just do quick Google research on how scientists determine age of fossils and you will find many links with detailed explanation of the methods, like this one.
Originally posted by bjarneorn
Originally posted by Phage
Seems an odd statement. It just indicates another branch of the tree. A branch that fell off.
More proof to darwynism, than anything else ... survival of the fittest, and there are many branches in the evolution ...
We weren't made "this way" by god, we evolved through a hard process of nature.
There used to be joke in my origin country:
Ants work whole their life and they are still ants, monkey was jerking around and has become a man.
On serious note, yes, this proves what we already know, evolution is not linear process.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
the fact that all non African humans have Neandertal DNA peresent in their genome.
Taken straight out of Black Liberation Theology. All whites are Neanderthals heh? HAhahahaha
Keep your hate injections to yourself.edit on 9-8-2012 by TinfoilTP because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by CaptainBeno
How do they know it existed 2 million years ago?? Is that a ball park or an actual figure or because they fitted in to go with the other species and their dates?? how were the other species dated??
Every time something is discovered they throw out how long ago it existed without really explaining how they came up with that.
Originally posted by bigcountry08
reply to post by SuperFrog
dosen't what we know of animal breeding kind of screw with this theory, if two diffrent animal species mate then the offspring is usually (except for very rare occasions) sterile. So it would almost be impossible for two diffrent species of "early human" to reproduce multiple young and have them all be fertile. Unless they originated from the same primate and just evolved diffrently along the way and then remet back up to do the deed.
Originally posted by yadda333
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by CaptainBeno
How do they know it existed 2 million years ago?? Is that a ball park or an actual figure or because they fitted in to go with the other species and their dates?? how were the other species dated??
Every time something is discovered they throw out how long ago it existed without really explaining how they came up with that.
Because the explanation would bore you to tears. Archaeological excavation and dating techniques are extremely BORING.
Did you go to the discovery article where they gave the incredibly boring details? Not only is it boring, but it would only confuse a lay person.
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
the fact that all non African humans have Neandertal DNA peresent in their genome.
Taken straight out of Black Liberation Theology. All whites are Neanderthals heh? HAhahahaha
Keep your hate injections to yourself.edit on 9-8-2012 by TinfoilTP because: (no reason given)
Lol you are the one who is making judgements based on superficial reasons. You assume I am black just because of my avatar...? And then you further make the ridiculous leap and believe I am somehow dissing whites in the process. That is just too funny.
You've basically just shown yourself up to be a racist while accusing me of the very same.
At any rate Neandertals have also been shown to have displayed all the hallmarks of culture and why am I even bothering to explain myself to someone who clearly has a little more than their fair share of Neandertal DNA anyway...
Cheers IEtherianSoul9 for the link
reply to post by IEtherianSoul9
edit on 9/8/2012 by 1littlewolf because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 1littlewolf
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Calling someone out on the ease to which they jump to making superficial judgements and their clear lack of knowledge regarding the subject at hand is a far far leap to'spewing hate'...
Originally posted by riddle6
reply to post by CaptainBeno
Your avatar always cracks me up
Two years ago I was in a geology class at school, and my teacher was talking about how in his day, the human evolutionary tree was pretty much a straight line. Now, in his own words, its a crazy bush. He said he used to give out a sheet with the names of all of the different species in their respective order and whatnot, but things changed too quickly, so he just showed it in on the projector. I can't help but think of him now. He'll have to go and update his list again.
Cool find.
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
New Human Species Found
www.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Fossils from Northern Kenya show that a new species of human lived two million years ago, researchers say.
The discoveries suggests that at least three distinct species of humans co-existed in Africa.
The research adds to a growing body of evidence that runs counter to the popular perception that there was a linear evolution from early primates to modern humans.
Originally posted by yadda333
Archaeological excavation and dating techniques are extremely BORING.
You'd lose. Calibrated radiocarbon dating is quite accurate within its limits (160-60,000 kya). Take a crash course :archaeology.about.com...
Originally posted by Labrynth2012
I'm going to CHALLENGE these PHd's on the 2million year THEORY because ITS BOGUS time keeping. They don't have a clue and are just pulling at straws. Carbon 14 dating has been proven to be a farce and unpredictable.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by yadda333
Archaeological excavation and dating techniques are extremely BORING.
I disagree...try it some time.