posted on Aug, 9 2012 @ 01:45 PM
reply to post by TinfoilTP
At least in science it is easy, you have to prove your theory, and Dr. Svante Paabo has done that, proving that large part of humans have about 2.5%
of Neanderthals genes. Early on this topic I posted link for his
from year ago, and as far as I know, it is not
proven wrong. If you have something in particualr, please post it and we can talk about it. Calling someones life work garbage just lowers quality of
discussion on ATS.
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by CaptainBeno
How do they know it existed 2 million years ago?? Is that a ball park or an actual figure or because they fitted in to go with the other species and
their dates?? how were the other species dated??
Just do quick Google research on how scientists determine age of fossils and you will find many links with detailed explanation of the methods, like
Originally posted by bjarneorn
Originally posted by Phage
Seems an odd statement. It just indicates another branch of the tree. A branch that fell off.
More proof to darwynism, than anything else ... survival of the fittest, and there are many branches in the evolution ...
We weren't made "this way" by god, we evolved through a hard process of nature.
There used to be joke in my origin country:
Ants work whole their life and they are still ants, monkey was jerking around and has become a man.
On serious note, yes, this proves what we already know, evolution is not linear process.