It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by raiders247
reply to post by mainidh
Bro we sent a rover to Mars before we ever saw a colored picture of the moon.
Google street view is made possible by millions of panoramic photos taken by special vehicles that drive through cities. If we can send a rover to Mars, why not send 1 to the moon just to get some quality pics of where we supposedly landed? But instead we are forced to look at nonsense that even I can doctor up in the earliest version of photoshop.
IMO, There are only 3 scenarios:
1. NASA has these photos and hasn't felt comfortable with the level of airbrushing thus far.
2. We never landed on the moon.
3. We landed there once and found out we shouldn't be there for whatever the reasons may be.
I am sorry to the OP but even with my glasses and blowing up the image on my computer I still don't see the "clearly visible" flag .
Even the lander part looks more like an out of focus hollow point bullet head on.
As others have pointed out the flag looks like a black speck, no matter how hard/loud the moon landing "case closed" supporters rant.
I will keep my comments only on this presented evidence of the moon landings.
While I think it is probable we went to the moon, these pictures DO NOT help prove this at all.
The major issue I have, had, and harp on is that the pictures are poor quality even by the standard of the technology used for the moon landing.
NASA HAS ACCESS TO technology from the military and other types not commercially available to the public.
At minimum it is reasonable to presume they have photo technology in their spare parts/leftovers/unused AT LEAST EQUAL to what google maps use to give satellite photos of your house.
I can go on-line anytime and get photos so clear I can see and identify my make and model of mini-van, kids swingset (its a basic small model), and my chimney.
There main argument has been the size of the supposed equipment to take good photos.
Well thats BS of the highest order.
1. They put a camera on the mars lander that takes (and we have been shown) STUNNING CLEAR COLOR photos of the martian mountains that have to be miles from the lander. Given all the other equipment and space limitations they seem to have done ok.
2. They make a big winney crying deal how they need PR due to lack of funding in the space program.
Then brag up the anniversary of the moon landing and how they are sending a probe up to take pictures of the landing sites.
Then give us pictures IMO even worse than from the 1970's.
Given the anniversary, technology available, and PR blitz as a whole HOW CAN A REASONABLE PERSON NOT HAVE REASONABLE DOUBT.
If this were a court of law these pictures would not even convince a grand jury to indite, and at a grand jury you can get an orange indited for ANYTHING.
I am not saying we did or did not go to the moon.
But those who use these photos to say "case closed" to anyone who questions the moon landing I have to ask who's wearing the tin foil hat?
I wonder can we not have a satellite orbit the moon and essentially map it just like google earth?
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Star and flag from liejunkie.
Nothing to really add but,
Take that moon landing hoaxers
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Star and flag from liejunkie.
Nothing to really add but,
Take that moon landing hoaxers
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Star and flag from liejunkie.
Nothing to really add but,
Take that moon landing hoaxers