It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jheated5
Well maybe because Zim had a broken nose and the back of his head was busted, while Martin only had bruises on his knuckles... These are facts not opinion, how do I know this works? Because 2+2=4
Here are 2 things that you should consider, before replying to me again:
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by BrokenCircles
Yeah he planed it out, he said "I'm going to make a criminal attack me and try to murder me so I can shoot him."
Really? A "fictional magician" is more believable.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by habitforming
What about Trayvon's justice?
Thug could walk away but instead he attacks man with gun. Thug beats man up and smashes his head in the pavement. Thug gets shot by man who has a right to defend himself. Thug gets 'justice'.
reply to post by habitforming
Thanks to SYG, if Zimmerman came up, took out his gun, grabbed my hoodie, and said anything that was not very nice, I am about to start beating his ass.
What does SYG have to do with this case? You don't need SYG to kill a would be murderer. Unless you do in FL? I'm really asking if you or anyone knows.
In what way is woodworking relevant to the topic at hand?
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by BrokenCircles
I'm sorry I didn't know I had to spell it out for you, my apologies.
It was NOT planed. To think it was planed is ignorant.
Was that better sweetie?
Once again, you have failed at both.
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
#1: Try to appear somewhat literate.
#2: Attempt to make some sort of an actual point.
Originally posted by jam321
Somebody must have given him a rope.
Cause he hung himself on that interview
I beleived from the start that Zimmerman had an agenda and is trying eveything he can to hide it. It was said that his family talked often about hating black people and the comments were more then damaging. I know it sounds strange but the minute I saw him I had a gut instinct about this man and it was not good or from God!
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—
A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.
776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
(5) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—
The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
www.husseinandwebber.com...
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by jheated5
Originally posted by jheated5
What kind of idiot tries to confront a guy and beat him up if he knows he has a gun???
I know. Not a very believable story, is it? And considering the only witness to this account has changed his story at least 3 times now, it's highly unlikely that ANY of the versions we've heard from him are true. Because only an idiot would confront a guy and try to beat him up if he knew he had a gun...
Originally posted by jam321
Just heard on the news that Zimmerman is reopening his website.
He is looking to get more gold.
I just find it odd that he wants to be in the spotlight so much.
Originally posted by GunzCoty
No you would beg for your life.
And the hoodie would leave marks on your neck as well as other evidence.
I love how so many people think the cops, forensics team, medics and coroner are all morons.
Oh I almost forgot to add.
What does SYG have to do with this case? You don't need SYG to kill a would be murderer. Unless you do in FL?
I'm really asking if you or anyone knows.edit on 7/19/2012 by GunzCoty because: (no reason given)