It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by habitforming
Oh, Zimmerman was attacked was he?OH OK.
All you have to do is prove that to me.
Have even ANY EVIDENCE of that at all?
Originally posted by roadgravel
Isn't the standard 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.
In order to convict a defendant in Florida of Second-degree murder, the State of Florida must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1 - The victim is dead;
2 - The death was caused by the criminal act of the defendant;
3 - There was an unlawful killing of the victim by an act imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind without regard for human life.
Understanding a second degree murder can be more confusing than the more serious first degree murder. The "criminal act" reference in the statute must be a single event or series of related actions arising from and performed pursuant to a single design or purpose of committing the murder or creating the dangerous condition that led to the death.
Originally posted by habitforming
So anyone you think is a thug is ok to shoot to death then?
Is that how justice works in America?
Originally posted by habitforming
they do not regret the fact that an innocent child is dead.
Originally posted by habitforming
If you come after me with a gun for no reason I am going to smash your head into something too.
Your response is ridiculous.
I do not want to have any part in any country where people just shoot people based on whether or not you think they are a thug.
Originally posted by habitforming
What about Trayvon's justice?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
A 17 year old male beating someone up and smashing their head against pavement when he doesn't have to .. that is a thug.
: a brutal ruffian or assassin : gangster, tough
If a 17 year old male is beating the crap out of me and I have a gun, I'm going to shoot him. If he dies .. it's his own fault for beating me up instead of walking away liike he could have.
Originally posted by habitforming
1 - Martin wasn't innocent. He was beating the snot out of someone when he didn't have to.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What about if he does it in self-defense?
What is a "thug", anyway? Why is that such a popular word among the Zimmerman apologists?
a brutal ruffian or assassin : gangster, tough We have no indication that Martin was any of these... yet people use that word regularly to apply to Martin. I wonder why?
Strange that you don't think Zimmerman had the same option to "walk away", like HE could have.
Trayvon was doing NOTHING wrong. Zimmerman pursued him, confronting him.
Originally posted by antonia
for someone saying we shouldn't jump to conclusions, you sure are drawing a lot of them yourself.
Originally posted by habitforming
reply to post by fnpmitchreturns
"I am not a racist, and I am not a murderer" said the man who killed a black kid for no reason.
Originally posted by RimDaas
If you were being followed by a man in a car you would get worried too.
Trayvon was doing nothing wrong. Zimmerman was. He decided to take the law into his own hands.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Zimmerman shot in self defense.
Martin wasn't beating up Zimmerman in self defense.
Martin could have walked away.
He chose not to.
A THUG ... comeon .. you know exactly what one is.
Why is it so popular among the Martin Apologists to downplay this?
Martin was beating a mans head into the pavement when he didn't have to. He could have walked away.
The witness' have Martin on top of Zimmerman.
he was.
You seem to assume a lot more facts about the case then the rest of us do.