Of all the individual Apollo Missions to study, the Apollo 13 Mission offers the serious student/historian of the Apollo fraud the greatest range of
PERPETRATOR GAFFES to first mine, and then to present for public attention/review. These include;
1) It can easily be demonstrated, simply by his ever loving presence in the MOCR, that Ken Mattingly was never at risk to come down with the German
Measles as the bogus Apollo 13 script claims.
2) The Cortright Commission, the investigative body that sought to determine how it was that the Apollo 13 ship was damaged, made the claim that 1.1
pounds of Teflon burned in O2 tank number 2. This burning of Teflon, and/or the burning of aluminum, was the fuel that provided the requisite energy
to blow the tank. However, when one reads the relevant scientific publications of the commission, induing and especially the appendix dedicated to
documenting the details of experiments done in support of the commission's conclusions, no where does one find any experimental support for the
claim that all 1.1 pounds of Teflon originally placed in the tank as wire insulation was available for combustion after that tank had been heated for
an extended period of time to 1000 degrees F. Also, there is no experimental evidence providing support for the claim that aluminum burned. What was
the aluminum ? Where ? How much ? Why did the aluminum burn ? More specifically what were the detailed forensics as regards the commission's
claims about aluminum ?
As such experimental support was never provided, one may incontrovertibly conclude that the Cortright Commision was a sham commission, as were its
results. The commission's report provided no experimental evidence to support the most important features of their claims about the Apollo 13
disaster's at root cause, the burning of 1.1 pounds of Teflon, and or an undisclosed amount of aluminum. Here it is important to emphasize, the
objection is not to the claim that Teflon can burn, or that some Teflon was available for combustion under the circumstances so described, the
objection is to the commissions's having failed to provide evidence that there was fuel sufficient, 1.1 pounds of Teflon, and so energy sufficient to
blow the tank.
3) John Aaron claimed that when he was called at home, he was able to do what the on site EECOM's, Sy Leibergot and Clint Black, were not able to do,
that is, determine very early on, based on the available EECOM data , this data having nothing more done to it than being READ TO AARON OVER THE
PHONE, that the problems being dealt with in Houston by the Flight Officers working the Apollo 13 mission at the time of the explosion were due to
primarily major hardware malfunctions/difficulties and were not simply instrumentational. Once again, we find Aaron so smart, too smart. His
intelligence is no intelligence at all, but rather, is a demonstration of fraud scenario foreknowledge. As such, Aaron is identified, based on this
alone, as an Apollo fraud perpetrator.
4) John Young claimed to be present at the time of the explosion, and like Aaron, Young claims his viewing of the early EECOM data lead him to
conclude that Apollo 13's difficulties were not instrumentational, but were rather, hardware based. What does John Young know about interpreting
EECOM data ? NOTHING ! Additionally, Sy Leibergot has directly challenged young publicly on this point, both by way of clearly stating that Young was
not present in Mission Control at the time, and publicly showing a photo documenting John Aaron's non presence.
This is the first and only occasion of which I am aware that such a challenge as Young's has been publicly addressed by the likes of a person of such
stature as that of EECOM SY LEIBERGOT, THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT MISSION CONTROL/HOUSTON BASED APOLLO 13 MISSION WORKER, BAR NONE NONE NONE, DURING
THE FIRST HOUR OF THE STAGED DRAMA. Keep in mind that Leibergot is not suggesting Young is a fraud perpetrator, or that Apollo was/is fraudulent. He
very much IS IS IS claiming however, and very strongly so , that John Young was/is misleading the public with regard to this important point. See the
video video; "John Young and Sy Leibergot, TWO VERSIONS, ONE REALITY, FRAUD !!!!!" for details.
5) Last but not least, Gene Kranz caught with his ever loving pants down big time. Kranz claims that 14/15 minutes into the staged drama , from the
time of Lovell's reporting that "something" was venting, he, Kranz, knew that not only was there an O2 tank explosion that was responsible for all of
this, something that his EECOMs were a long way, perhaps HOURS from doing, even in a preliminary sense, but Kranz also claims that at that time he was
aware that the LM may have had to serve in the capacity of "lifeboat" . 15 minutes in, LM as lifeboat per Kranz. All this before it was determined
there were significant hardware and not primarily instrumentation problems to begin with. Kranz's coming up with this claim references a time well
before the LM was even checked out as not being responsible for the problem to begin with, before the LM was even excluded as having been involved at
some root level in some significant way in all of this funny business, such as excluding its having been holed by a small meteor, and being holed by a
meteor was a legitimate concern given the fraudulent scenario as presented to the flight officers working the problem.
Listen carefully in the video below as Kranz hits the panic button, pulls the ABORT HANDLE, and changes subjects faster than two shakes of a space
monkey's tale upon his being surprisingly and effectively challenged by a well meaning, exceedingly naive, though intelligent, obviously quite
intelligent, producer/editor in the COMMENTARY VERSION OF THE HISTORY CHANNEL FILM;
THE RACE TO THE MOON/ FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION as regards these facts. The producer/editor having stumbled upon them, but not being quite capable
enough, meaning not at all suspicious, and so never in a position to think through the ominous implications of this nice piece of a sort of "blind
investigative journalism".
The video above is an excerpt from the History Channel Production, THE RACE TO THE MOON aka FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION. This is a "documentary" based
on Kranz's book of the same(latter) title.
Here, one find's a bit of the film's introductory segment. The film then jumps better than an hour forward to the segment of concern.
The excerpts of relevance begin one hour, fifteen minutes, and thirty some odd seconds into the COMMENTARY VERSION OF FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION/THE
RACE TO THE MOON . In the clip above, this segment of concern is found correspondingly four minutes in. We hear three voices, those of Kranz and two
of the producers/editors.
The producers/editors begin by stating that they had the occasion to listen to the Apollo 13 Flight Director's loop tapes. Hearing the drama play out
this way gave them a real sense for the tension packed SOUND of the moment. And indeed, next to Apollo 11's/Armstrong's insanely bogus "ONE SMALL
STEP LINE", Apollo 13's "HOUSTON WE'VE HAD A PROLEM LINE" is the staged manned landing program folly's most "famous" audible.
edit on 20-6-2012 by decisively because: title too long for system so shortened
edit on 20-6-2012 by decisively because:
removed quotes, commas, caps ,spelling, spacing, added "?", "the fuel",an undisclosed amount of",that some was available for combustion under the
circumstances so described", "As such experimental support was never provided,""incontrovertibly"
edit on 20-6-2012 by decisively
because: sound > SOUND, added "of concern", "Apollo 13" "tapes", added "audible" occurs> begins,I> the film, commas, spacing, removed "at least",
Kranz> Kranz's, come> coming, "before the LM was excluded as having been","effectively" added and being holed by a meteor was a legitimate concern
given the fraudulent scenario as presented to the flight officers working the problems and the public as well."
