reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Tearing 'em a new one
Read this first;
I understand the issue as regards "possibility " very well here. My point of course is that they must launch Apollo 14 with any potential aluminum
problems corrected. And we can clearly see they never made an attempt to identify such problems, the Cortright Report of course being a sham.
Let's proceed now to the commission scientists' major claim, that the burning of 1.1 pounds of Teflon was more likely than not responsible for the
blowing of the tank.
First of all, the commission's story is that the tank started with 1.1 pounds of Teflon and was heated for an extended period of time to roughly
1000 degrees Fahrenheit. It was this heating that allegedly exposed the wiring by way of the Teflon insulation's "removal".
Now any genuine forensics specialist would have obtained such a tank and heated it to 1000 degrees F for that very same, alleged, prolonged period of
time. This, to determine if said Teflon insulation could in fact be lost from the wiring surface by the process of heating, and so expose the
underlying metal. If this in fact could be shown, a forensics specialist would go on to see how much of the original 1.1 pounds of Teflon remained in
a state available to the system for combustion. How much wiring was exposed by the alleged heating ? How much Teflon was available for combustion ?
We shall never know, as the appropriate experiments were simply never done. Let's move on....
Let's assume that they had done the above, heated the tank to 1000 degrees, and had shown that x amount of wiring was exposed. Let's be super generous
and agree with the commission's bogus story, just to press our point. Let's give them, as unbelievable as that would be, the fact that after heating
to 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, all 1.1 pounds of Teflon was available to the system for combustion. Now for their scenario to be supported by
experiment, they would have to show that the 10-20 joule(energy amount) spark which they alleged ignited the Teflon was SUFFICIENT TO ACTUALLY DO THE
SAME. There is no discussion in this fraudulent , scientific forgery of a Cortright Commission Report as to whether the 10-20 joules of energy
alleged to have been supplied by the "spark" was adequate activation energy wise(en.wikipedia.org...
) to start Teflon(or
aluminum for that matter) burning. There is no experimental support for this, the Commission's absolutely inane claim.
For the Commission to back their ridiculous claims, they would need to actually blow a tank or two. Run 10-20 joules through a hyper-cool oxygen
environment, THE EXACT ENVIRONMENT THEY CLAIMED WAS THE SCENE OF THE "EXPLOSION" AND SIMPLY SHOW US THAT YES INDEED, THAT AMOUNT OF JUICE COULD START
THE ALLEGED QUANTITY OF TEFLON AND/OR AN UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT OF ALUMINUM BURNING TO RELEASE THE REQUISITE ENERGY/HEAT TO RAISE THE TANK'S PRESSURE AND
WAS ANY OF THIS DONE !!!!??????? NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
THIS REPORT IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF FRAUDULENT, COOKED BOOK, MADE UP, FANTASY, CHEATING CHEATING CHEATING PRETEND SCIENCE.
"The heat leak from the Apollo cryogenic tanks, which contained hydrogen and oxygen, was so small that if one hydrogen tank containing ice were placed
in a room heated to 70 degrees F, a total of 8-1/2 years would be required to melt the ice to water at just one degree above freezing. It would take
approximately 4 years more for the water to reach room temperature. "
From the NASA reference above that opened this post, CHAPTER 4 REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF APOLLO 13 ACCIDENT;
"The burst pressure of the oxygen tank is about 2200 psi at -150° F, over twice the normal operating pressure at that temperature. The relief valve
is designed to relieve pressure in the oxygen tank overboard at a pressure of approximately 1000 psi. The oxygen tank dome is open to the vacuum
between the inner and outer tank shell and contains a rupture disc designed to blow out at about 75 psi.")
The challenge to the other side is to go through the report and show us how they get from their experiments to their conclusions. Again, I OFFER
THEIR OWN REPORT AND THE ABSENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR CLAIMS AS PROOF OF MY OWN CLAIM THAT THIS WAS A SHAM COMMISSION, AND AS
SUCH, APOLLO 13 AND ALL OF APOLLO IS 10 PLUS BOGUS PHONY FAKE FRAUDULENT.
Readers would be correct in coming to the conclusion that here in this thread, the NASA boys are about to have their Heinies torn off and handed to
them in a way never done heretofore.
edit on 29-6-2012 by decisively because: added "the" "insulation's", added quote
edit on 29-6-2012 by decisively because: wiring> insulation
edit on 29-6-2012 by decisively because: added " by
the process of heating", comma
edit on 29-6-2012 by decisively because: added "ACTUALLY DO THE SAME", CAPS
29-6-2012 by decisively because: ADDED "!!!!???????"
edit on 29-6-2012 by decisively because: COMMA