Relax there naked13, so much more to comereply to post
You've just seen/read a bit, tip of the spaceberg as I like to say. I'll show you a half dozen videos of Kranz and Lovell yapping this, that, and
the other thing. You'll also need to go through the other EECOM tapes. The next EECOM flight officer up was Clint Black who worked the next 8
hours. As time goes on, you'll begin to get a feel for when it was or was not determined that there might have been an "explosion", or that oxygen
was actually leaking from a tank.
That is a good exercise to go through. Can you tell naked13 from listening to the EECOM tape and by way of reading the VOICE TRANSCRIPT if it had
been determined by the time Leibergot went off duty that there was O2 leaking, or that an O2 tank exploded, or that the LM as a lifeboat was needed ?
See if you can figure out when it was that the flight officers became aware of the "explosion" if they ever so became aware during the actual days
of the Apollo 13 flight. See if you can determine when the flight officers were able to tell that O2 was leaking, that it was O2 that was venting by
way of reading the Voice transcript and listening to Leibergot's EECOM tape.
This is sort of where the money is, for openers anyway. There is a lot to it.
For example , did you know that Edgar Mitchell claimed he was in the MOCR, just like John Young claimed he was in the MOCR, when the tank blew ?
Did you know Edgar Mitchell claimed that within MINUTES, he was aware it was a "LM as lifeboat " situation ? Well if you did not, you know now, and
I'll present a nice reference from the Stu Roosa Biography, a Mitchell quote to support that, a direct Mitchell quote/claim.
So of course these astronauts were not in the MOCR, it is night time for God's sake, fairly late as a matter of fact, and everything was cruising
along hunky dory, AND SY LEIBERGOT HAS THAT NICE PICTURE TO SHOW THE MOCR WAS EMPTY, no one there but them flight officers, NO JONH YOUNG, NO EDGAR
The most compelling evidence in a way is the scientific evidence as regards aluminum. This, even given Kranz's and Lovell's nutty testimonies as
regards all of this.
Consider this, the Cortright Commission claims that in addition to 1.1 pounds of Teflon burning in O2 tank two, and so probably being responsible for
the "combustion" that lead to the tank's blowing, an undisclosed amount of aluminum may also have burned as well and so contributed to the energy
release that lead to the damage/disaster.
Why don't you start on your own before I get there naked13 ? I am bound to be working on Kranz here for a week or two. Even before I get started on
it, posting references, why not look at the Cortright Commission documents yourself, including the scientific appendix on the experiments they
purportedly ran in support of their conclusions ? Can you find any experimental support for their claim about aluminum ? What kind it was ? HOW
MUCH ALUMINUM BURNED AND WHY THIS MUCH ? WAS IT HOT ENOUGH TO IGNITE ALUMINUM IN THAT TANK ? WHY/HOW DID THEY DRAW SUCH A CONCLUSION.
You will fined the Cortright Report to be a sham, and with it, all of Apollo. By all means , do not take my word for it. check the facts for
yourself, independent of my references and my presentation/approach to the problem.
There are several other "anomalies" I can point out, but for now, I think I would like to focus on these, for it represents a great effort, each
subject; Kranz's shuck and jive and fake crying, Aaron's poppycock story about diagnosing a non-instrumentation problem from home, Young's claim
he was there when the tank blew, Mitchell's claim he was there and knew it was a "LM as lifeboat situation" minutes in, Cortright claims so bogus
with respect to the quantity of Teflon burning, the quantity of aluminum alleged/ or not alleged to have burned, and the reason Teflon and aluminum
were inculpated given the circumstances.
All bull. Fasten your seat belt, you are in for the ride of your life.