It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The WTC 7 thread to end WTC7 threads

page: 19
87
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter

Nothing like a smart mouth kid to know it all .


I'm 50.


I suspect you have debunked Agenda 21 and the FEMA camps


Why would I?

Are you a believer in more than one ct?


as well and you voted for OBAMA


I'm Canadian. But I wouldn't have voted for him.


You still believe that the Fed Reserve is a US government banking institution .


Couldn't care less.




posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


Oh you live in Canada . Then you are alreadyh on your way to



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 11:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


You can't deny Agenda 21 you already live under it . Canada and Socialism are very close . You already gave up your rights .And you did it willingly . That explains a lot . You might be French and that would explain even more . Why don't you keep your nose in your own business we don't need your input on whats happening in America seeing how good you have done up there .



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by SimonPeter
 



LOL...

This is all just a diversion on your part to deflect away from the moronic claim that paint on thermite could of caused the collapses.

And when asked a question that would expose your folly, you go on a personal attack.

My being Canadian has no bearing on my question to you. It is a question that exposes just how you have neither followed your statement through to find the facts on how this would work, nor how you have researched how that mechanism would work, whether through melting through columns or just heating them to weaken them.

You have been exposed as a failure...



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 05:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 

You really haven't got a clue do you . Yes Super Thermite mixed into a mixture and applied to a metal surface will burn with an intensity to very quickly heat the steel to a very high temperature . This is called paint by its nature of application . You're one of those that they really like . Your government can tell you anything and you swallow it like a child . Sense you are most interested in ridiculing people rather than getting to the truth of the matter you can't even understand paint as being an application method of any material . I'm sure it would be a thick paste application that would dry on the structure . As a matter of fact sense you won't look at the whole picture there was extensive work at night on building 7 as reported by it's occupants . Column's are always where plumbing , electrical and communication as well as fire piping is located within the same column chase . No one would know if the fire shield was removed from the column and a slurry of the Super Thermite was applied . Paint if you insist .
Still you only want to ridicule people with your arrogance . You remind me of Kevinunknown another like you .



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
No one would know if the fire shield was removed from the column and a slurry of the Super Thermite was applied .



All of the columns had a 1 1/2" layer of fire proofing sprayed on them. You would need to remove that before you could paint them.



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter

You really haven't got a clue do you .


Actually, I do.

For example, I know for a fact that you have no idea how thick it would need to be to reach a point that the steel would fail.

Cuz if you did, you would simply post it, along with the facts and maths to show it.

Everyone sees it.

And everyone sees your failure.



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 05:52 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


You briefed my post. I said no one would know if the if the fire shield was removed and the Thermite was applied . Of course the sheet rock would go right back up after the installation was finished closing off prying eyes from what happened . The actual insulation ( fire shield ) might be as thick as 3 inches in places but comes off quite easily . Thermite applied to all faces of a beam burning at 5400 degrees would melt a beam over a relatively large area very quickly failing that beam .



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous

Originally posted by SimonPeter

You really haven't got a clue do you .


Actually, I do.

For example, I know for a fact that you have no idea how thick it would need to be to reach a point that the steel would fail.

Cuz if you did, you would simply post it, along with the facts and maths to show it.

Everyone sees it.

And everyone sees your failure.





I thing everybody see's that your just mouth or you would show me the math and exactly how thick the thermite woulds have to be . I doubt you could understand it if I did . Thermal expansion would never break down a steel building . Any assumption that the building was faulty in construction implies that the structural engineers of record were negligent . The steel structure has been around a long time and fires are not new . Structural steel methods are pretty standard now . And over all the fires within the structure were never that involved . If it were most of the windows would have been out of the facade . Fire needs air and the whole building fell together or it would have tilted .



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter

I thing everybody see's that your just mouth or you would show me the math and exactly how thick the thermite woulds have to be . I doubt you could understand it if I did



No.

this is called shifting the burden of proof. It is your claim that thermite could do it. I am calling for a detailed estimate of just how. You cannot give the details, therefore you are justv repeating something you read, and do not have the technical expertise to evaluate whether or not this is a valid claim.

So yet another post where you demonstrate your failure in being able to decide whether or not the things you have read have any validity to it or not.

Everyone sees it.



posted on Jun, 27 2012 @ 06:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


As I said ,prove me wrong . You didn't even know there was such a thing as Super Thermite or Nano Thermite . How is it that Nano Thermite was found in the dust and debris of the WTC ?
For a change answer that last question . As far as the molten metal noted in more than Bld.6 , how long does it take for a primary buss to kick out ? Molten metal or even red hot metal not explained . Im not even sure if the thermite would explain that . How about the missing Comex gold ? There is a lot that happened all at the same time and that's no coincidence . And of course the Congressional testimony problem Bush and Cheney has is criminal . And you seem to be complicit in the same thing .



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


As I said ,prove me wrong . You didn't even know there was such a thing as Super Thermite or Nano Thermite . How is it that Nano Thermite was found in the dust and debris of the WTC ?
For a change answer that last question . As far as the molten metal noted in more than Bld.6 , how long does it take for a primary buss to kick out ? Molten metal or even red hot metal not explained . Im not even sure if the thermite would explain that . How about the missing Comex gold ? There is a lot that happened all at the same time and that's no coincidence . And of course the Congressional testimony problem Bush and Cheney has is criminal . And you seem to be complicit in the same thing .


Nanothermite is literally an invention of the guy who first analyzed the dust. It did not match any explosive, so he made one up and then made up all sorts of characteristics for it.

It has never been tested, reproduced, or anything. Until it is, the whole nanothermite issue looks really dumb.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 09:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


As I said ,prove me wrong . You didn't even know there was such a thing as Super Thermite or Nano Thermite . How is it that Nano Thermite was found in the dust and debris of the WTC ?


It wasn't found in the dust. This was verified a few months ago. Paint chips.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 09:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by waypastvne
 


You briefed my post. I said no one would know if the if the fire shield was removed and the Thermite was applied . Of course the sheet rock would go right back up after the installation was finished closing off prying eyes from what happened . ---snip-----.


Another truther that has never worked in a large UNION RUN building in NEW YORK CITY.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter

As I said ,prove me wrong .


No shifting the burden of proof, please.

It is your claim, but now we all see that you cannot back it up.

Everyone sees your fail.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Varemia

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Fluffaluffagous
 


As I said ,prove me wrong . You didn't even know there was such a thing as Super Thermite or Nano Thermite . How is it that Nano Thermite was found in the dust and debris of the WTC ?
For a change answer that last question . As far as the molten metal noted in more than Bld.6 , how long does it take for a primary buss to kick out ? Molten metal or even red hot metal not explained . Im not even sure if the thermite would explain that . How about the missing Comex gold ? There is a lot that happened all at the same time and that's no coincidence . And of course the Congressional testimony problem Bush and Cheney has is criminal . And you seem to be complicit in the same thing .


Nanothermite is literally an invention of the guy who first analyzed the dust. It did not match any explosive, so he made one up and then made up all sorts of characteristics for it.

It has never been tested, reproduced, or anything. Until it is, the whole nanothermite issue looks really dumb.


So you and your buddies ignore the fact that the term 'truther' is a made up term but you lot still use it incorrectly on a daily basis at ATS!

As for nano-thermite, it existed/exists, but all official records of it existing have been removed.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous

Originally posted by SimonPeter

As I said ,prove me wrong .


No shifting the burden of proof, please.

It is your claim, but now we all see that you cannot back it up.

Everyone sees your fail.



You say your 50 years old but act like a 15 year old! "Everyone sees your fail" that is the kind of stuff teenagers come out with. Are you sure about your age?



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by kidtwist
 


Thank you !!!!!!!!!!!! My thoughts exactly .



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Six Sigma
 


Or figure out how the ninjas can move the furniture out of the way, cut open the sheet rock ,
Scrape off the fire proofing, paint on the "soper sekrit nano nano thermite:", replace sheet rock, repaint it,
clean up the mess, move furniture back

AND HAVE NOBODY NOTICE IT....!!!

Hell couple years ago were replacing some computer equipment over the weekend (new CPU)

Monday morning caught all sort of grief from stupid women for moving their Knick knacks, pens, papers from around the computer.......

These guys definately need to get out of mommy;s basement......



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 12:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by kidtwist
So you and your buddies ignore the fact that the term 'truther' is a made up term but you lot still use it incorrectly on a daily basis at ATS!

As for nano-thermite, it existed/exists, but all official records of it existing have been removed.


Truther is a descriptive term used to describe people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.

How can you be certain that nano-thermite exists/existed if all records of its existence don't exist? That's like saying magical pink unicorns exist or existed, but we can't prove it because the evidence of their reality has been hidden from the public. It's a seriously stupid argument.




top topics



 
87
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join