It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
...we know it ends up on your forehead or right hand.
Chris' Vision
I was with a friend the other day who I will call Chris, to protect her true identity. She was given an extensive vision of the future last Sunday Morning.
She shared the following after asking me for a summary of Gayle Smith's visions, which she said matched what she had seen, complete with economic collapse, powerful earthquakes along the Wasatch Front, Martial Law, occupying troops, the mark of the beast, persecution of the Saints. Her vision confirmed and went beyond what Gayle has shared.
She was shown this bright red flash that came out of the sky. When I asked where she was when she saw this, or where it happened, she couldn't recall a particular location but rather seemed to have the impression that the location was more like "everywhere," as though there would be many places that would see this phenomenon. She did not say whether or not this was a nuclear blast.
She was shown that the U.S. would enter into an alliance with Russian and China allowing their troops to come here to help enforce the New World Order. That was when the mark of the beast was instigated in which a person would be killed if they did not take it. She was shown that those who voluntarily took the mark had it in their right hand, while those who resisted had it placed in their forehead as a token of their recalcitrance for all to see and be alert so as to keep them in order. Chris' Vision
Originally posted by ConspiracyBuff
The revelation scripture people like to quote is figurative not literal.
Preterism, Another Prophetic Deception
The preterist has adopted the allegorical method to interpret Scripture as did Origen. The end result of this method of Bible study causes literal pieces of Scripture to be treated as figurative and thus nullified. Quite simply if the Scripture does not fit into the preterist belief formula then it is considered a figurative or a spiritualized piece of Scripture. Therefore the Scripture does not really mean what it says! Instead it means something in a figurative manner. They would have been just as effective if they took their scissors and physically cut out Revelation chapter 20.
LINK
Preterism is a Catholic doctrine that claims the second coming of Jesus occurred in 70AD at which time all the dead in Christ were also resurrected. It contains the false doctrine that the Church age ended in 70AD and the millennial Kingdom of Christ began. The 1000 years of the millennial in Revelation 20 is spiritualized from a literal interpretation into the claim it is figurative for a long unknown time length. Catholic monks embellished the preterist interpretation with additional false teachings
LINK
Originally posted by ConspiracyBuff
Social Security numbers and bar codes are the mark of the best. Most of us have our SS# memorized (mark on head) bar codes [have 666 in every one] are on every product we buy, most of which we hold in our hands. The revelation scripture people like to quote is figurative not literal.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by Murgatroid
The whole purpose of the Ark has since been fulfilled by Christ, so why would God even bother to bring the Ark back into play?
THE PROPHETIC TELEGRAPH No.78
Before beginning the amazIng story of this discovery, I must say that the whole episode has been compassed about by miracle. God has set His seal upon this most holy artifact of the past, and shown that it has some great significance for the days just ahead, whether in fact or in type. And the impact that it will have on world Jewry can hardly be estImated.
And so it was that God the Father had rent the rocks to make a way for His Son's blood to flow down from the spear-wound, through the newly formed fissure onto the very Mercy Seat itself. Now just think about this for a moment. Jeremiah had deposited the Ark in the cave some six centuries B.C., with absolutely no knowledge of the events which were to occur on Good Friday.
The Romans who hacked out the post-holes had absolutely no knowledge of what lay beneath their feet, nor that they were positioning the CENTRAL hole in exactly the right place. And until the Lord had died, there was no way for blood to trickle down because there was no crack. But these Amazing coincidences actually happened. Yes, they ARE coincidences, because everything had to COINCIDE exactly for it to happen, but there was never any human design - it was entirely the work of God in Heaven, who knew the end from the beginning, and arranged for it to happen in that way.
Link
ArkDiscovery.com - Jim Pinkoski describing Jesus' crucifixion that was directly above the Ark of the Covenant, hidden in a cave by Jeremiah in 586 BC, found by Ron Wyatt.
While in the chamber, Ron Wyatt noticed a dried, black substance in an earthquake crack in the roof, above the Ark of the Covenant. He noticed that this black substance was also on the lid of the cracked stone casing. Obviously, this substance had dripped from the crack in the roof, and provision had been made for it to land on the Ark of the Covenant, as the stone lid had been cracked and moved aside. Ron wondered what substance could be so sacred, that God made provision for it to land on the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. He remembered the earthquake crack at the foot of the cross hole, and suddenly an awesome realization as to what had happened, came over him. Ron traced the earthquake crack, and indeed it was the same crack as the one at the cross hole. The dried black substance in the crack was tested and proved to be blood, apparently the blood of Jesus Christ. Ron Wyatt discovered that this same blood and water poured down through the earthquake crack and fell upon the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant... LINKS: 1 2
"Ron Wyatt paid a lab in Israel to do an analysis of the blood. Mr. Wyatt asked them to do a chromosome test, but they informed him that he was wasting his money since you can't do a chromosome test on dead white blood cells. They proceeded with the analysis and said, "It's your money." As they began viewing the cells under the microscope, they saw cells dividing before their eyes! They could tell it was human blood, but "This blood is alive!"
"They couldn't believe what they were seeing! They continued with their tests and found the blood to be unique from any other human blood! Each cell contained only 24 chromosomes compared to the normal count of 46 that you and I have. Christ received 23 chromosomes from Mary, and one "y" chromosome from His heavenly Father to designate a male child."
"With tears in their eyes they asked, "Whose blood is this?" Mr. Wyatt replied, "It is the blood of your Messiah." Then they asked who the Messiah was, and they began wailing and shouting. No other male human being has ever had this same chromosome count! Christ's blood is alive and unique to prove His divinity to the world before He returns to this earth." Source
Originally posted by stupid girl
Originally posted by SolaFide
reply to post by Murgatroid
Ron Wyatt has been proven to be nothing more than a fraud.
Proven?
So there is existing factual data that confirms this beyond a shadow of doubt?
Or is there conjecture and opinion that you heard from someone else or read on a website somewhere a while back, but you just can't recall exactly who said it or what the site was?
I've never heard of Ron Wyatt, so if he is a fraud, as you claim, I would be interested in you sharing how you came to this solid conclusion.
Originally posted by Numbers33four
This has nothing to do with the mark of the beast. And the mark will not be slipped in when no one is looking. It will not be hidden. You will not be fooled into taking it. You will know very well that you are pledging your body and soul to satan when they impress the brand into your flesh. It will not be forced upon anyone. When they come to mark you either you willingly take it or you die. It is that simple. And at the time this happens the earth will be broken and falling apart. We will be close to the end and it will be so bad that if God himself does not step in and intervene all flesh will perish from the earth. There will be absolutely no debate about the mark of the beast. It will be known for what it is and it will not be hidden. He will be on the earth and ruling it and it will be his mark and we will all know it. The book that the concept of the mark comes from tells you everything you ned to know about the mark. The context of that book is within a world where slaves and devotees to pagan religion received in their flesh a brand called charagma. It was burned into the flesh. This is the word for the mark. You will be branded as slaves of the beast.edit on 15-6-2012 by Numbers33four because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
It's been here longer than that bro. It's been here since the days of Nimrod at least. Nothing effects your ability to buy and sell like money.
Originally posted by shaluach
Do you have some good websites or something where I can look into "historicism"?
Horae Apocalypticae (Hours with the Apocalypse) is doubtless the most elaborate work ever produced on the Apocalypse. Without an equal in exhaustive research in its field, it was occasioned by the futurist attack on the Historical School of interpretation. Begun in 1837, its 2,500 pages are buttressed by some 10,000 invaluable references to ancient and modern works. It ran through five editions (1844, 1846, 1847, 1851 and 1862)."[1] In 1868 he published a Postscript to comment on the events, or perceived lack of events, marking the prophetically significant years, 1865/7.
Originally posted by bekod
It goes back to the first UPC product here is some history it is older than you think,[ personal the SS card was the first step to bus being "branded" but that is just me]
Originally posted by caladonea
I am thinking that some laws may eventually be passed where no one and I mean no one...will be able to go into any place and purchase anything...without first showing their ID...having proof of who they are.
Originally posted by Danbones
I am going to say the US isn't the final beast...
maybe the corporation of the USof A in DC ....is a head or a horn....or a hoof
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by MaMaa
I'm sorry, I don't follow you. Where is this supposed mark?
The Mark of the Beast is a reference to Revelation 13:16-17. Many believe that the mark of the Beast will be a biochip implanted in either the hand or the forehead.
I don't think it's implants. I think the mark is something that almost everyone is willing to have done to them. The mark I'm thinking of also desecrates the lord's sacred temple (the human body). And that mark is - tattoos.
The whole purpose of the Ark has since been fulfilled by Christ, so why would God even bother to bring the Ark back into play? The same with the Jewish sacrifice. Why would God want the Jews to revive animal sacrifice for sins, when his son already defeated sin by making the only ultimate sacrifice for sin that will ever be needed?
Originally posted by burntheships
Originally posted by defcon5
So the big question is does the bible actually say it has to be implanted, or is that just one interpretation of that verse.
I think a tattoo, even an invisible one such as the one by SOMARK will qualify.
They are passive, and bio compatible now. No harm, no foul to the human
except to say that if its the Mark of The Beast, save your money lose your soul.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Jews need the Ark to be saved,
And, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from the top to the bottom" -Matthew 27:51
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
they have to be fooled by the A/C to show them their folly, in order for them to be fooled the mercy seat has to still be here because that is what will bring him out of hiding.
Jesuit Theologian Francisco Ribera
Apocalypse commentary
In order to remove the papacy of the Catholic Church from consideration as the Antichrist (as an act of countering the Protestant Reformation), Ribera began writing a lengthy (500 page) commentary in 1585 on the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse) titled In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij, proposing that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse apply to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3½ literal years, immediately prior to the second coming. During that time, the Roman Catholic Church would have fallen away from the pope into apostasy because of the Reformation cry stating that "the papacy is the seat of the true and real Antichrist." (Martin Luther, Aug. 18, 1520).
Then, he proposed, the Antichrist, a single individual, would:
Persecute and blaspheme the saints of God.
Rebuild the temple in Jerusalem.
Abolish the Christian religion.
Deny Jesus Christ.
Be received by the Jews.
Pretend to be God.
Kill the two witnesses of God.
Conquer the world.
To accomplish this, Ribera proposed that the 1260 days and 42 months and 3½ times of prophecy were not 1260 years as based on the year-day principle (Numbers 14:34 and Ezekiel 4:6), but a literal 3½ years, hence preventing the arrival of the deduction of (i) the 1260 years to be related to the Dark Ages (according to the Historicism (Christianity) interpretation of eschatology from 538 A.D. when the papal power was fully established in Rome until its political blow in 1798 A.D., when Louis-Alexandre Berthier the general of Napoleon captured pope Pius VI as prisoner to Valence, France) and (ii) the Antichrist to be related to papacy.
Originally posted by Murgatroid
reply to post by defcon5
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by Murgatroid
The whole purpose of the Ark has since been fulfilled by Christ, so why would God even bother to bring the Ark back into play?
Very good question, because it gets to the very root of WHY this discovery has been one of the most fiercely attacked discoveries in history. Your answer lies in the location of the discovery. The Ark of the Covenant was found in a cave 20 feet directly below the spot where Jesus was crucified. God intended for the blood of the Lamb to fall upon the Mercy Seat and this is WHY satan HATES this and has spared no expense to slander it!
Originally posted by MaMaa
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by MaMaa
I'm sorry, I don't follow you. Where is this supposed mark?
The Mark of the Beast is a reference to Revelation 13:16-17. Many believe that the mark of the Beast will be a biochip implanted in either the hand or the forehead.
I don't think it's implants. I think the mark is something that almost everyone is willing to have done to them. The mark I'm thinking of also desecrates the lord's sacred temple (the human body). And that mark is - tattoos.
Right, but an implant isn't exactly a mark.. it would be under the skin, no visable mark. And not many people would go get a tattoo on their hand or forehead. I have a tattoo on my ankle and another just above my knee to the side, those 'marks' don't follow the qualification of being on the hand or forehead.
No they need Christ to be saved, the same as everyone else.