It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One would imagine a character like you are imagining to have seen flying objects every other week and to have gone on the UFO circuit.
If you're satisfied that they all misidentified a cloud as a flying object due to ignorance and a will-to-believe in flying saucers, what else can I say? If it makes sense to you, it hardly matters what they claimed to have seen and their descriptions become redundant.
The reasons given in the report are insufficient for doing so.
They ruled out clouds.
A cloud diminishing in size would present the illusion of doing so.
They described the object as moving away at speed
Yes.
They discussed it amongst themselves.
Above this cloud layer, well out in the clear air, I saw what I thought was a small cloud. Just for the fun of it I said, “Boy, look at the flying saucer!”
We were roughly paralleling the coast at the time and Roy, I think mentioned, “There’s a flying saucer”. We have kidded Roy a good deal about flying saucers since the night about two years ago when he and Bob Laird were in 1951 and sighted some lights over Catalina. These lights reportedly stood still for a while and moved around over the island and finally disappeared.
Certainly not uneducated. Familiar with lenticular clouds? No mention of it having been considered.
It wasn't a case of the flight crew being uneducated or ill-informed; neither does the report seem to be prejudiced by one member being overly-enthusiastic about saucers.
I’ve been interested in flying saucers, particularly ever since one evening during the 1951 Christmas Holidays. I was putting up a TV antenna on my roof when I looked up toward the north over the hills behind our home and saw a large circular object, apparently stationary. The time of day was abut dusk and I watched the object for several minutes and called Leslie and a neighbor, Mr. Murphy, who also looked at it.
They saw something, considered other possibilities and then concluded it was an unknown object.
That is a description of a lenticular cloud.
Wimmer’s first impression was that it was a small cloud. After studying for several minutes, though, I deduced that it was not a cloud because it had too definite sharp edges and its appearance stayed constant.
Originally posted by Phage
The only explanation of why a cloud was ruled out is Thoren's
Wimmer’s first impression was that it was a small cloud. After studying for several minutes, though, I deduced that it was not a cloud because it had too definite sharp edges and its appearance stayed constant.
That is a description of a lenticular cloud.
I don't care how smooth it looks, I don't think that looks at all like the craft the witnesses claimed to have seen.
As already noted, Johnson said "[t]he object, even in the [8x binoculars], appeared black and distinct." That really needs to be addressed more fully before it can be dismissed or considered explained.
For this to have been a dissipating lenticular cloud it would need to be established that Johnson and the flight crew were all on approximately the same radial from it, i.e. that the flight crew was basically in between Johnson and the cloud.
He says he was looking toward the setting sun, which in December was setting at an azimuth of 242º. This is a strong correlation. What can we determine from it? There is no indication of horizontal movement. Johnson says that the object was moving in the direction he was looking.
I ran outside and started to focus the glasses on the object, which was now moving fast on a heading between 240˚ and 260˚
We flew directly toward it for about five minutes and our relative position did not appear to change. I do not recall our exact speed, whether we were still climbing or whether we had leveled off during the time.
As Rudy was flying the airplane, I had nothing else to do but to watch the object. After about five minutes I suddenly realized it was moving away from us heading straight west. In the space of about one minute it grew smaller and disappeared.
The background was bright due to the fact that the sun was just setting. The object appeared not to move while we progressed with our tests. For a few moments we turned the airplane toward the object but did not apparently change our distance sufficiently to get any change of impression. I estimate that the object was hovering in out sight for about ten minutes. Thereafter, it suddenly accelerated due west and in a time, in the order of 10 seconds, disappeared from view.
Although the object appeared to be absolutely stationary, we did not seem to be closing the gap between us and this object. even though we were flying at some 225 miles per hour. The object then seemed to be getting smaller, and my attention was diverted from it for a minute or so, but Wimmer mentioned that the object was disappearing. In probably an elapsed time of somewhere around a minute, the object had reduced in size to a mere speck, and then disappeared. It’s direction was almost due west.
After looking at the object off and on for about five minutes, it became apparent that it was moving away from us and in just a minute or two it completely disappeared. As it was disappearing, I looked at it off and on and gradually I could not see it at all. Roy watched it continuously and could see it after I had lost sight of it--he actually observed it continuously I believe. It disappeared in a generally westward direction (toward the setting sun).
Sure. Why would an aeronautical engineer know much about lenticular clouds? The reasons he gave for discarding a lenticular cloud are not sufficient to do so.
Do you honestly believe that one of the most renowned aeronautic engineers would mistake a cloud for a UFO?
We're talking about multiple experts and trained observers looking at this and concluding it was not a cloud.
Any one whose taken a course in aviation knows that pilots are trained observers, and highly credible. It takes brains to fly an airplane.
Engineers know structure. So when an aeronautical engineer says he saw a craft, and not a cloud I am willing to accept that.
Your course instructor didn't tell you immediately that you should spend about 70 percent of your time in the cockpit scanning the skies? He didn't teach you how to use short eye movements in about 10 degree increments to spot air traffics wheather formations, or something unexpected, like a flock of birds? Before making any maneuvers you should scan the area you will be ascending or descending to?
Originally posted by Phage
I don't recall ever being told about lenticular clouds in training sessions but then, I already knew about them.
edit on 6/10/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)