Keep in mind my statement only was addressing this quote.
The fact that this man had HIV, got AIDS, his HIV was cured and his AIDS disappeared is proof. Consider the claim debunked.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Laokin
You can't simply say that. Prove it to be true. In fact show me someone immune to HIV with AIDS.
edit on 11-6-2012 by OccamsRazor04 because:
(no reason given)
You can simply say that, that's how science works.
Let me frame it another way....
You get cat scratch fever... the lymph-nodes on your head swell up. Shortly after, you break a wisdom tooth, and it gets infected.
You go to the dentist and he tells you it's infected and it must be removed, but before he can remove it, you need to take anti-biotics to kill the
infection. You take the anti-biotics and it cures your cat scratch fever too.
Did the broken wisdom tooth cause the cat scratch fever? No, the cat scratch was there first. Did the cat scratch cause you to break a molar? No...
By your argument, since both situations were cured with the same procedure they must be causing each other.
Correlation =/= causation. Correlation can sometimes warrant an investigation to see if it really is the cause... but just because there is a
correlation doesn't necessarily mean that correlation is your cause.
I didn't say it's not, in the case of HIV and AIDS. All I said was, just because this man had an immune system transplant that cured both, doesn't
mean that HIV causes AIDS. It's likely even if HIV and AIDS weren't correlated that an immune system transplant would cure both anyway.
Don't be a fool.
There is also a growing pool of scientists and researchers who are now saying that HIV doesn't cause AIDS... There is a metric tonnage of research
out there supporting it too... The consensus is split. In other words, nobody knows... not even the scientists... they all have their theories
edit on 11-6-2012 by Laokin because: (no reason given)