you say( I don't believe your introduction)
It's alright. There are more than enough traces of me on the internet to compile an ID enabling anyone interested to show up at my doorstep if they so desire. Would be complicated, currently, due to being deployed - but stateside, they could.
I posted references
mil docs at that
With all due respect - you don't know what you're looking at.
Further - this isn't a scientific or legal issue. It's a critical analysis issue. You're not going to be able to post much in the way of facts regarding "use of nazi drones to enslave population" outside of fear-mongering blogs - which have as much credibility as I do (and there exist blogs with people explaining why it's a retarded suggestion that can be linked to).
You need to be able to think logically about a problem rather than be able to sling a bunch of drivel in an attempt to put together a display of intelligence.
just for starters smartboy:
That's the use of non-lethal weapons against violent crowds or hostile individuals on foot.
You, also, completely missed my point.
The drones are supplied, maintained, and operated by people living in or with families in the United States. The operational readiness of those drones is going to be affected by the opinions of those individuals. Even if you had a single person in control of the world's combat drones.... what power do they have if no one shows up to re-arm, re-fuel, repair, etc said drone army?
but you already know all this you are an xpert
You're confused; blinded by your own genius on the matter.
How do you use an army, enabled by the population of a country, to subject it? If the population is no longer willing to enable the army (regardless of whether it is manned or automated) - it is disabled, and therefor no longer capable of being used as a subjugating force.
Drones wouldn't last more than a single sortie without millions of individuals actively supporting their operation. Even if you could somehow conscript a bunch of civie-haters into your O-level maintenance - you are looking at about two to three days of operation before fuel reserves start getting tight and weapons start running low. If you could get regional supply chains to continue supplying people suppressing their families - then you might be looking at a week to two weeks of operations (depending upon which region and exactly what kind of strain is being placed upon it).
Of course - with that, it's not just the squadron. Each squadron operates out of a base that has hundreds to thousands of other supporting individuals. From your base security (the guys in the military with guns... most in the military are not even qualified to operate a firearm, interestingly enough) to your DFAQ staff (usually civilian contractors) various administrative staff, and -other- squadrons with manned/unmanned aircraft.
The documents you cite are talking about issues involving dangerous escapees (who should have been executed to begin with - if their escaping is that big of an issue, they shouldn't be around to escape in the first place), riots, and other issues involving the defense of public interests (while the people participating in a riot may think they are doing the popular thing because they are surrounded by a bunch of other assholes - most people do not like having their # torn up and set on fire, surprisingly).
Your paranoid delusions spin that into "OMG! They are going to push-button us into nazi prison camps!"
Get real. Imprisoned populations wreak havoc on corporate profits - the same corporations making the lethal and non-lethal munitions will have their profits plummet six feet under if your whole nazi paranoia scheme were to play out. Which is exactly why it won't happen.
The mark of an intelligent person is the ability to think and analyze a situation.
