It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by satron
But when you turn to a guy that is decreasing in likelihood in getting the nomination (when you know very well he could have won if circumstances were... different), sometimes it makes sense to look at the blood line. Now what? If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, then what?..
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Just now watching the Sean Hannity show and he said Rand Paul would have an important announcement.
Rand Paul just endorsed Mitt Romney. He is going to campaign for Romney and feels he can unite the base.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Just because he isn't a carbon copy of Ron is no reason to bash him. This applies to everyone else who doesn't agree with Ron Paul either.
Originally posted by kosmicjack
reply to post by getreadyalready
Don't dog pile me, this is a conspiracy site...
I'm not saying it's true but I am saying there are those who have always said Ron Paul was controlled opposition. This kind of gels with that doesn't it? To an extent? Is it conceivable that Rand didn't consult with his Dad before making this decision? He must know his Dad's end game.
Originally posted by frazzle
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Just because he isn't a carbon copy of Ron is no reason to bash him. This applies to everyone else who doesn't agree with Ron Paul either.
Say your father was running for President and he had a 30 year track record of integrity and honesty. He probably treated you very well all your life, as well. So in his last run for office, you would endorse his opponent just because you aren't a carbon copy of your father?
No one but Paul, and when this election cycle is over the GOP won't see me leaving through the dust cloud.