It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And information theory is a subcategory of information science. And yes they have.. You might want to google protein folding as just one example. Other examples I have pointed out and linked to would be on Biochemical self-organizing cycles. And you seem completely ignorant that all of that is essentially electromagnetic phenomenon.. And what you don't seem to grasp is that in information science, atoms are considered bits of information that can self-organize in electromagnetic interactions. Sequencing of atoms, like that to which forms something like a rock, is equivalent to an informational structure and sequence to which has self organized.. And PI doesn't need "anticipation", it needs feedback in the system between interacting forces and parts. In fact, anticipation can not function without a system with feedback at all. And you are trying to compare cognitive systems with reactionary systems...And you might want to learn something about Chaos theory and what it has to do with cybernetics:
The mechanical brain does not secrete thought "as the liver does bile," as the earlier materialists claimed, nor does it put it out in the form of energy, as the muscle puts out its activity. Information is information, not matter or energy. No materialism which does not admit this can survive at the present day.[
Yeah except we are well passed the 1940's and now live in the quantum age where energy and information are the same thing... You know, other modern theories that deal with chaos theory, and emergence.. Because in the modern era of today, there is only Physical information, and physical informational states of energy. Here let me help you with modern information science that isn't based on some guys 1940's understanding of information science and theory:
Originally posted by squiz
Encoder, transmission medium, decoder and of course function. Like I said DNA is way beyond even this simple abstract explanation.
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by rhinoceros
Because there are also an army of molecular machines busy attaching, modifying, removing and replacing small chemical tags to both DNA and proteins, these tags specify a plethora of different interactive cohesive functions within the cell. There are other layers of code and the epigenic layer or layers. Also the information is not one way as in the central dogma. Junk DNA seems to be involved in regulating and the modfiying of genes.
I'm no ignorant of bio-electrical communication at all or self organizing properties of the cell. In fact it is part of my argument against neo-darwinism. Beyond the origin of the genetic code, evolution can be competely self organizing at the level of the cell. The random accumulaton of accidents filtered by natural selection has to make way for Horizontal gene transfer, transposition, symbiogenesis, adaptive mutation and natural cellular genetic engineering. Non supernatural intelligent design. Yes bio electric signals have been discovered in morphogenisis, It has shown to be an organizing precursor above the level of the genome. Bio-electrical communication has been found between bacterial colonies separated by glass leading researchers to believe that the bacteria are actually using photons to communicate.
I'm also an advocate of plasma cosmology and believe that electromagnetism is the prevailing organizing factor in cosmology rather than gravity.
So I'm not ignorant to electromagnetic properties at all, in fact the modern evolutionary theory has nothing to say about it.
Proteins are the functional physical result of the symbolic code in DNA.
Beyond biological examples none of these apply to code. The Biological signals are indeed forms of code, this is a product of genetics anyway. You can't jump to self organizing factors determined by the thing we are trying to explain in the first place.
Originally posted by squiz
Still no one has provided a citation for a functional code that has naturally occured. This is the crux of the argument and it is avoided at all costs.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by rhinoceros
Because there are also an army of molecular machines busy attaching, modifying, removing and replacing small chemical tags to both DNA and proteins, these tags specify a plethora of different interactive cohesive functions within the cell. There are other layers of code and the epigenic layer or layers. Also the information is not one way as in the central dogma. Junk DNA seems to be involved in regulating and the modfiying of genes.
Yes, in contemporary cells, which are the result of ~4 billion years of evolution. Especially eukaryotes display remarkable complexity with the added "histone code" layer not present in prokaryotes. However, it's rather obvious that the origins of this system are much more simple, i.e. the "genetic code" certainly included only a few amino acids at first, and additions were made as the code evolved. This is rather obvious when looking at the current almost universal translation table and e.g. amino acid synthesis and tRNA esterification pathways.edit on 28-7-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheJackelantern
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Barcs
Science has performed experiment after experiment concerning abiogenesis. Not one of them has resulted in LIFE from NOTHING! And they never will. Because it is impossible.
By the way, you show me a single post where I have come down on one side or another...You sure group people pretty fast and make assumptions...
Nobody ever claimed life from "nothing".. And you can't make things from something that doesn't exist. Show us a life form made of nothing.. Oh yeah, show us a life form missing its atoms.. What? You can't? Well your argument is pretty much in the toilet bowl flushing itself down the drain. It amazes me how dumb some people can intentionally be, and how they can't grasp basic reality that life is entirely made of non-life (atoms) that are governed by electromagnetism, and shaped by other environmental electromagnetic forces to which includes non-electromagnetic forces such as pressure waves ect. Man you people are the worst when it comes to intellectual integrity and honesty.. You have absolutely no regard for it what-so-ever. People like you can't seem to stop creating logical fallacies, lying, making straw man arguments, or engaging in dishonest discourse. It must feel great to be so intentionally stupid at the same time.
People that say evolution doesn't happen are like people saying it's impossible for atoms to rearrange them selves to form new pattern and sequences.. The amount of sheer ignorance that takes is astounding to say the least. It's intentional retardation because there is a fantasy to protect at all costs to which includes sacrificing all of ones honor, integrity, honesty, life, savings, family, selves, or even to the point of killing others because they are so psychologically screwed up and brainwashed to fear and worship the imaginary..
Now that might sound harsh, but I do think at this point it's quite deserving giving the sheer amount of dishonesty we are seeing in these threads. Yeah, truth hurts...., learn to deal with it, and learn to deal with reality.
Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.[1] The subject may use:
simple denial: deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether
And the key to spotting them is those making magical assertions of truth that can not back up their claims with anything. They sit their and deny anything and everything.. People here in denial of evolution are actually far more in denial of reality than even Flat Earthers.. All for a religious cult that survives literally on ignorance, and the preying on ignorance. Classic of a few posters here I need not name.
The one you just posted should more than suffice.edit on 27-7-2012 by TheJackelantern because: (no reason given)
Science has CONCLUSIVELY eliminated abiogenesis. finished, kaput, bupkus, nada, (i.e., THAT DOG DOES NOT HUNT!!! STICK A FORK IN IT!!!)
Abiogenesis, and all other explanations science tries to come up with considering life origins, is BANKRUPT and will remain BANKRUPT because they cannot PROVE anything.
Evolutionary science has everything to do with electromagnetism and it's properties. In fact it's the very factor they have to consider when doing anything regarding evolutionary processes and biochemistry, code theory, or the study of abiogenesis.. So basically you are choosing to be intentionally ignorant of this fact. Do you seriously think you could get away with that here?
WRONG! Protein folding does not need DNA what so ever..
All these systems are entirely in requirement of a system with feeback to which governs both cognitive systems and reactionary systems.. This is the base need of any system the evolves, reacts, processes, or communicates.
WRONG! You can't get any more wrong than this..!!
So if you think information theory needs a mind to code, you are completely ignorant of reality..
Now regarding abiogenesis, we have tons of information backing it up,