It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by uva3021
Nice, I only needed the abstract.
1) Dna has a code - this was denied
2) Biology as Information science. - this was denied
It's that simple. Even the simple abstract puts that to rest.edit on 29-6-2012 by squiz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by MrXYZ
Then I'll repeat once again, provide proof. Name one!
Originally posted by squiz
It's a specific type of information, it is not shannon inforamtion. See how we try to avoid the issue.
So you can't name one then?edit on 4-7-2012 by squiz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by squiz
Dna as a digital code - denied
Bioinformatics and Information theory -denied
Scientific use of inference - denied.
You are simply trying to avoid the argument with all sorts of nonsense because you cannot provide an example of a functional code not coming from a mind. It's a typical defense.
Mathematics, bioinformatics, cybernetics, and inference are psudeo science now are they? Wow. Just amazing.
Instead of giving your opinion why don't you back your claims with some peer reviewd evidence?
I don't think I've ever seen you post anything scientific at all. I've seen you fumble with even basic reading comprehension. I'm guessing your a high school student.
Give some proof. Some papers demonstarting the above and how it is false. So far it's nothing but strawmen.
If you can falsify my claim provide a code that doesn't come from a mind?
The appeal to unknowns is not a scientific option. We have a good understanding of physics and chemistry, your Earth has life analogy is just another strawman. I almost wet myself when I read your "breaking it down" argument. Hillarious! That's quite a talent you have there!
Originally posted by squiz
What is obvious is that atheism is illogical, it is simply the fundamentalist view of materialism. The atheists version of religion. It must rely on what cannot be known as many have shown here. It's completely Ok to say we don't know. If that is the case you have then stepped up to agnosticism. The more humble position.
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by MrXYZ
You need an encoder, transmission medium and decoder. For the type we are talking about. Which example was it again? Try to understand the concept.
Muppet? that's cute. Geez, we resorted to that stuff pretty quick.edit on 4-7-2012 by squiz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by squiz
What is obvious is that atheism is illogical, it is simply the fundamentalist view of materialism. The atheists version of religion. It must rely on what cannot be known as many have shown here. It's completely Ok to say we don't know. If that is the case you have then stepped up to agnosticism. The more humble position.
Originally posted by squiz
"The spontaneous formation of a polypeptide of the size of the smallest known proteins seems beyond all probability. This calculation alone presents serious objection to the idea that all living matter and systems are descended from a single protein molecule which was formed as a 'chance' act."
Harold Blum.
"The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand naughts [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence."
Sir Frederick Hoyle
"The improbability involved in generating even one bacterium is so large that it reduces all considerations of time and space to nothingness. Given such odds, the time until the black holes evaporate and the space to the ends of the universe would make no difference at all. If we were to wait, we would truly be waiting for a miracle."
Robert Shapiro
"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going."
If a particular amino acid sequence was selected by chance, how rare an
event would that be?
This is an easy exercise in combinatorials. Suppose the chain is about two hundred amino acids long; this is, if anything, rather less than the average length of proteins of all types. Since we have just twenty possibilities at each place, the number of possibilities is twenty multiplied by itself some two hundred times. This is conveniently written 20^200 and is approximately equal to 10^260, that is, a one followed by 260 zeros!”
Francis Crick
"When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities:
Creation or spontaneous generation. There is not a third way.
Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: That life arose spontaneously by chance!"
George Wald
Atheism chooses to believe the impossible ! Random chance is the new spaghetti monster!edit on 4-7-2012 by squiz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by john_bmth
How the hell did information theory get dragged into an evolution debate? Seriously, squidz, please stop talking out of your other orifice. Information theory is strictly the domain of man-made signal processing. What next? Mpeg layer 3 explains biodiversity?