Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?

page: 3
82
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 26 2012 @ 09:56 AM
link   
The problem with Hoagland is the same as Wilcox. Take a compelling idea or position and turn it into a career with a smattering of truth for profit.
And I don't want to hear Hoaggie Or Wil aren't making dough.

We're still not told exactly what kind of cristals are being grown at the space station:
www.bbc.co.uk...
OR who get's the financial reward. How do THOSE contracts under GSA, get awarded?

Russia is not just posturing for position.

"Impact On The Moon" makes for a great movie headline. Sounds great. Get the first drafts started and let's see who we can get to star in it. Different countries sabatogging each other while they work together. Lot's of subplots. (Of course the American Space agency guys would be the hero's at the end.)

Quick question? I am still confused with all of the unemployed NASA engineers out on the street, and they signed Non Discosure Agreements, wouldn't a couple of disgruntled employess want to come forward, make a few bucks and set the record straight?

Curious minds want to know.





posted on May, 26 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   
Sure..bomb the moon just to see what happens
......Ummm The USA actually WAS going to...Just to see what happens..
Project A119..
en.wikipedia.org...

Apparently, Apollo 13 was to detonate a small nuclear blast on the surface, and register the seismic result.
But the Koldasians didnt appreciate that, and shot a ray into Apollo 13 to neutralize the bomb, but instead popped a hole in the structure. Then escorted Apollo 13 back to Earth. The Bomb, NASA pretends it was a special mini nuclear reactor to power electrical instruments etc, is at the bottom of the Tonga trench, 6 miles deep in the ocean.

Apparently, the Earth Saurians still have a base on the Moon, as do the Koldasians (in the Sea of Tranquility). Maybe NASA and other country's have the pictures?...or it didnt happen.


Will the populace ever Know the truth? Apparently Not.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:19 AM
link   
Awesome replies everyone.

Good stuff.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 

The answer to your questions is...

Yes.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   
a cover up of WHAT?

what would need to be covered up?

Since we cannot tele-port objects how can there be a cover up of any kind of construction which we still have no technology to build do to transportation issues caused by gravity.

you do have the start of a great Lunar Sci-Fi Papa Slayer



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Military troops on the moon. Ive heard that before. True or not. Im as sure as hell they we've placed "stuff" up there...and found "stuff" already there.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by hangedman13
Why not? Do we actually know about all the space missions? It is plausible that some top secret mission happened and they were covering it up.... Just the initial mission sounded odd.


Even before the shuttle program ended, they were doing secret missions for the military.

So the USA is still in space -- it's just all classified and for military use. To "defend our nation" while we get evicted from our homes for lack of funding.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:45 AM
link   


Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?

Everything is possible,since noone is allowed to ask why.

If we accept the weird theories about the moon(hollow moon,alien ship etc)to be true,NASA would definetely want a piece of the pie,before anyone else got their hands in it.
What they would want to hide?
What about not to hide anything,but create conditions that will not allow anyone to get up there.I mean that we don't know what kind of chemicals or radiation was carried and spread in the surface after the crash.

OR they just wanted to bomb the nazi base in the dark side of the moon.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by gort51

Apparently, Apollo 13 was to detonate a small nuclear blast on the surface, and register the seismic result.
But the Koldasians didnt appreciate that, and shot a ray into Apollo 13 to neutralize the bomb, but instead popped a hole in the structure. Then escorted Apollo 13 back to Earth. The Bomb, NASA pretends it was a special mini nuclear reactor to power electrical instruments etc, is at the bottom of the Tonga trench, 6 miles deep in the ocean.

Apparently, the Earth Saurians still have a base on the Moon, as do the Koldasians (in the Sea of Tranquility).


Valuable information. I hope you don't mind if I copy n paste this for present and future study.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 





Odd you should mention that. I was just reading an article that said Russia has intent to field a moon base by 2015, and begin large scale export of Helium-3 back to Earth from it by 2020.


They will corner the market on clean fusion energy read somewhere that He-3 goes for over 5 million a gram.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by KibbleChild

The planned October 9, 2009 bombing of the moon by a NASA orbiter that will bomb the moon with a 2-ton kinetic weapon to create a 5 mile wide deep crater as an alleged water-seeking and lunar colonization experiment, is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies. The NASA moon bombing, a component of the LCROSS mission, may also trigger conflict with known extraterrestrial civilizations on the moon as reported on the moon in witnessed statements by U.S. astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, and in witnessed statements to NSA (National Security Agency) photos and documents regarding an extraterrestrial base on the dark side of the moon.

Source

If they were willing to violate space law to bomb the moon, then they must have had an important reason to do it in they're minds. Who knows maybe they really did bomb an extraterrestrial civilization on the moon, but thats HIGHLY speculative.





If that is the case, but since the moon has ZERO gravity, all of the water they would be blasting would be sent out into space, NASA has some sharp engineers, but the water blasting idea sound incredibly like Monty Python -esq comedy skits, then i would think earth would be bombarded by chunks of rock and ice inadverdently creating more space debris as well.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
It's all about the timing. From a related thread on the topic.

Russian space agency confirms plans for Moon base

www.theverge.com

Russia's space agency, Roscosmos, has publicly confirmed its plans to create a permanent habitation on the Moon. In a talk at the Global Space Exploration Conference, Roscosmos head Vladimir Popovkin said that "we’re not talking about repeating what mankind achieved 40 years ago... "We’re talking about establishing permanent bases." This isn't the first we've heard about Russia's Moon base. In March, a leaked Roscosmos road map suggested that it could send a manned mission for that purpose sometime after 2025. Popovkin has also previously said his agency was in talks with potential E



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   
I also wondered why they bombed the moon. As to there being anything up there, we havent been told so we wont know what they found up there. I often thought that if there were ancient aliens, or a race that reached our level of tech. Then they would have also made that same first step onto the moon. Maybe they left their foot prints there and left a lander or two laying arround? As to the bombing well its anyones guess what the reason for doing it was. Do we trust what NASA, tells us? I dont.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:23 PM
link   
Excellent thread and a great read Slayer. This is a fascinating theory and subject matter that really tickles my fancy.


From what I understand though, I thought they crashed the NASA piece very close to the moons north pole where there is known to be water (Frozen ice), if there was some sort of base / settlement there, this would be a very good place for it as you would ideally wan't a water source.
edit on 26-5-2012 by Helious because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:55 PM
link   
I like the idea of this topic. No this is not a veiled attempt to misdirect the topic but I believe if this country or any other had the ability to send and sustain human life on the moon this wouldn't be a secret now it would be an open flexing of power. My logic is western countries are about money making as well as control, it goes without saying they would be mining the moon for any rare elements as well as building Hyatts and Hiltons all over the place turning it into a veritable Disney World for the tourists.

I too was puzzled as to why they (NASA and Japan) were crashing objects into the moon. People don't like to admit this but everything NASA do have a metaphysical (Masonic) basis which could possibly mean the crashing of objects were symbolic.
edit on 26-5-2012 by Chai_An because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 12:58 PM
link   
NASA bombed the moon because they wanted to have their own version of the Demolition derby. It must be terrible to have a job where you can't go out and get an old car and crash into another car. We should change our social status a little to allow these scientists to participate in these kind of things. I mean it would save the taxpayer a lot of money if we were to buy them a three hundred dollar junker then sell it for scrap in the end and get most of the money back. a couple of hundred bucks is a lot cheaper than a million bucks and the end result will have the same tranquilizing effect. If everyone at NASA got into this we could save a billion dollars within five years.

Sometimes I wonder why we need to go to the moon at all. These bragging rights are a little expensive for the taxpayer and the ecological impact is huge overall. If we keep sending metals to the moon we will eventually need to start sending recycle rockets there to pick up the metals. Another reason to fly to the moon I suppose.

The only coverup here is the necessity of the moon bombing mission in the first place and the total cost of the project. I like to look at the big picture and then look for the coverup deception on the whole project. If NASA didn't have projects like this they couldn't justify their big salaries. That's a true conspiracy if you ask me.

Heck, maybe the NASA scientists think the moon may be a big spaceship too. I guess they found out it was just a moon now and put that theory to rest. Super intellect is just a step away from insanity. Insanity is more fun though.
edit on 26-5-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by rickymouse
 


I don't know about that. NASA's budget is peanuts compared to "Defense" spending not to mention it's dwarfed by the Pentagon's "Black Budget" spending while with NASA we get to see some pictures and cool launches



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 01:25 PM
link   
reply to post by poopadoopoulis



If that is the case, but since the moon has ZERO gravity

 


not according to Ingo Swann "Penetration"
forgive me I lost my PDF to this book, which is a rare find and relevant to this topic...Ingo via "Remote Viewing" says there is gravity and atmosphere of comparison to ours at about 12,000 ft elevation.

can anybody who has read "Penetration" confirm my claim?

ETA ::: claim of atmosphere and only some gravity only
edit on 26-5-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 01:36 PM
link   
in recent times there's been quite a few discoveries that would make a trip back financially feasible and even profitable so i can't, for the life of me, think of any reason we haven't.

i'm sure it's not but in my mind and with the technology in our hands now it just seems like it'd be an easy task so there has to be some crazy reason and this is just as believable as any i've heard.



posted on May, 26 2012 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 

2012 ,Dec21st will be the one time every 200,000 years in which the universe bounces back to a point in which every light year is reduced to a third of travel.

In a document discovered while Astra ling, I found out that the aliens would use this one time moment to steal earth’s moon and use it for a rouge planet that has no moon or gravitational pull, where at, I do not know, and the document did not say.

In another sensitive document I came across, it was said that under interrogation it was said that



’X’ has also pointed that all the moons can be moved, and has been moved from planet to planet to establish a planets heart beat’ for eons, and eons'''.


Back in the Bush sr era when he was with the CIA, it was told that he received a lot of Intel from an event that happened at a place called 'Dulce', a place in which they found hordes of aliens who they caught, and have been interrogating them till this day .

George bush, and others through the years of intel established chemicals , chemicals that would prevent aliens from breathing on earth, and landing to abduct humans, this was in 1987, and they still spray this chemical in the air still today.

In another secret document, it was asked ,‘what will happen if they take the moon ?’ We must act now’

The same chemicals they spray in the USA is the same chemical they bombed the moon with.

They infected the moon with a virus that will hopefully keep them from taking it this year, that’s all.

And if it doesnt work..well.
'Moon Wars coming to an Earth near you'

edit on 26-5-2012 by LastProphet527 because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
82
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join


Help ATS Recover with your Donation.
read more: Help ATS Recover With Your Contribution