Awesome replies everyone.

Good stuff.

a cover up of WHAT?

what would need to be covered up?

Since we cannot tele-port objects how can there be a cover up of any kind of construction which we still have no technology to build do to transportation issues caused by gravity.

you do have the start of a great Lunar Sci-Fi Papa Slayer

Military troops on the moon. Ive heard that before. True or not. Im as sure as hell they we've placed "stuff" up there...and found "stuff" already there.

Originally posted by hangedman13
Why not? Do we actually know about all the space missions? It is plausible that some top secret mission happened and they were covering it up.... Just the initial mission sounded odd.

Even before the shuttle program ended, they were doing secret missions for the military.

So the USA is still in space -- it's just all classified and for military use. To "defend our nation" while we get evicted from our homes for lack of funding.

Originally posted by gort51

Apparently, Apollo 13 was to detonate a small nuclear blast on the surface, and register the seismic result.
But the Koldasians didnt appreciate that, and shot a ray into Apollo 13 to neutralize the bomb, but instead popped a hole in the structure. Then escorted Apollo 13 back to Earth. The Bomb, NASA pretends it was a special mini nuclear reactor to power electrical instruments etc, is at the bottom of the Tonga trench, 6 miles deep in the ocean.

Apparently, the Earth Saurians still have a base on the Moon, as do the Koldasians (in the Sea of Tranquility).

Valuable information. I hope you don't mind if I copy n paste this for present and future study.

I also wondered why they bombed the moon. As to there being anything up there, we havent been told so we wont know what they found up there. I often thought that if there were ancient aliens, or a race that reached our level of tech. Then they would have also made that same first step onto the moon. Maybe they left their foot prints there and left a lander or two laying arround? As to the bombing well its anyones guess what the reason for doing it was. Do we trust what NASA, tells us? I dont.

Excellent thread and a great read Slayer. This is a fascinating theory and subject matter that really tickles my fancy.

From what I understand though, I thought they crashed the NASA piece very close to the moons north pole where there is known to be water (Frozen ice), if there was some sort of base / settlement there, this would be a very good place for it as you would ideally wan't a water source.

I like the idea of this topic. No this is not a veiled attempt to misdirect the topic but I believe if this country or any other had the ability to send and sustain human life on the moon this wouldn't be a secret now it would be an open flexing of power. My logic is western countries are about money making as well as control, it goes without saying they would be mining the moon for any rare elements as well as building Hyatts and Hiltons all over the place turning it into a veritable Disney World for the tourists.

I too was puzzled as to why they (NASA and Japan) were crashing objects into the moon. People don't like to admit this but everything NASA do have a metaphysical (Masonic) basis which could possibly mean the crashing of objects were symbolic.

NASA bombed the moon because they wanted to have their own version of the Demolition derby. It must be terrible to have a job where you can't go out and get an old car and crash into another car. We should change our social status a little to allow these scientists to participate in these kind of things. I mean it would save the taxpayer a lot of money if we were to buy them a three hundred dollar junker then sell it for scrap in the end and get most of the money back. a couple of hundred bucks is a lot cheaper than a million bucks and the end result will have the same tranquilizing effect. If everyone at NASA got into this we could save a billion dollars within five years.

Sometimes I wonder why we need to go to the moon at all. These bragging rights are a little expensive for the taxpayer and the ecological impact is huge overall. If we keep sending metals to the moon we will eventually need to start sending recycle rockets there to pick up the metals. Another reason to fly to the moon I suppose.

The only coverup here is the necessity of the moon bombing mission in the first place and the total cost of the project. I like to look at the big picture and then look for the coverup deception on the whole project. If NASA didn't have projects like this they couldn't justify their big salaries. That's a true conspiracy if you ask me.

Heck, maybe the NASA scientists think the moon may be a big spaceship too. I guess they found out it was just a moon now and put that theory to rest. Super intellect is just a step away from insanity. Insanity is more fun though.

in recent times there's been quite a few discoveries that would make a trip back financially feasible and even profitable so i can't, for the life of me, think of any reason we haven't.

i'm sure it's not but in my mind and with the technology in our hands now it just seems like it'd be an easy task so there has to be some crazy reason and this is just as believable as any i've heard.