Pole Shift Data You Shouldn't Ignore

page: 1
48
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+13 more 
posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:37 AM
link   

The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center has updated (revised – massaged) their magnetic north pole-shift positional data and has projected the location of the pole through 2015. The pole shift, if you will, continues to race along in the same direction since it dramatically accelerated back in the mid 1990′s. But…
NOAA made some significant and apparently linear changes to the pole location data going back to the years 2001 through 2010. The most noticeable result of the changes that they made was an overall linear slow down of the shift during the past decade, although still currently high at 30 miles per year. They have projected positional data through 2015 and have slowed the pace of movement each subsequent year from 30 miles (2012) to 24 miles (2015).
No apparent reason for the change was listed. A 10 year change nonetheless! Given the fact that they suddenly changed their previously posted data of the previous decade to indicate a slower pole-shift progression, they are now able to project a slowing trend through 2015. If it were not for changing their own data, they would not have been able to project this trend through 2015. It is beginning to look like the USGS, who when they change their earthquake magnitude numbers, they always (95% of the time) revise them downward. The revisions made are always in a ‘less alarming’ direction.
The following map shows the position of the magnetic north pole, and its shift since 1977.



globalrumblings.blogspot.com...




The following image plot shows the comparison between the original magnetic north pole locations and now the new revised locations (2001 onward) from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).






previous NOAA data revised NOAA data
Latitude Longitude year Latitude Longitude
80.815 -109.568 2001 80.772 -109.478
81.268 -110.89 2002 81.225 -110.807
81.714 -112.344 2003 81.67 -112.268
82.193 -114.095 2004 82.149 -114.026
82.623 -115.892 2005 82.578 -115.83
83.127 -118.178 2006 82.996 -117.828
83.579 -120.578 2007 83.443 -120.273
83.981 -123.067 2008 83.838 -122.814
84.37 -125.881 2009 84.218 -125.681
84.742 -129.077 2010 84.548 -128.62

2011 84.86 -131.91
2012 85.154 -135.594
2013 85.396 -139.28
2014 85.618 -143.339
2015 85.791 -147.26

www.ngdc.noaa.gov...



Read here* for the past 400 years of magnetic north pole shift. Clearly it can be seen where the annual pole location begins to spread during the mid 1990′s when the acceleration rapidly increased.
globalrumblings.blogspot.com...

*Alarming NOAA data, Rapid Pole Shift

The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center maintains a data set of annual magnetic north pole coordinates going back to the year 1590, derived from early measurements from ships logs to modern day techniques.

Noting that there has been lots of reporting of pole shift lately, to the point where the phenomenon is actually causing real-world issues such as temporary airport closures, a deeper investigation was in order.

After transferring 420 years of north pole position data from the NOAA Geo Data Center, configuring it to fit in an Excel spreadsheet, adding a complicated formula to determine exact distance between 2 sets of latitude-longitude coordinates, applying the formula to each data point in the series, and then finally plotting it all in a visual graph, it is alarming to discover the amount of magnetic pole shift – just over the past 10 to 20 years.



Here is one very interesting fact…
Since 1860, the magnetic pole shift has more than doubled every 50 years. That is pretty significant. In geological terms, that seems to be pretty ‘rapid’.

Here is another very interesting fact…
During the past 150 years, the pole shift has been in the same direction.

The following fact is even more astonishing…
During the past 10 years, the magnetic north pole has shifted nearly half of the total distance of the past 50 years! In other words, the pole shift has apparently sped up substantially.

Pole Shift has more than doubled each of the last 50 years



modernsurvivalblog.com...

edit on 5/16/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: typos

 
Starting a New Thread?...Look Here First

AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count.
Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.
If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events,
or important information from other sites
please post one or two paragraphs,
a link to the entire story,
AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item,
as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.

edit on Wed May 16 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


what were the previous methods used to collect the data before the last 20 years?

It cant be ruled out that the data is is just being recorded now in finer detail.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by CrimsonMoon
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


what were the previous methods used to collect the data before the last 20 years?

It cant be ruled out that the data is is just being recorded now in finer detail.


reply to post by CrimsonMoon
 



The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center maintains a data set of annual magnetic north pole coordinates going back to the year 1590, derived from early measurements from ships logs to modern day techniques.
modernsurvivalblog.com...



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:24 AM
link   
reply to post by CrimsonMoon
 


More specifically:



Wandering of the Geomagnetic poles

Movement of magnetic poles from 1590 to 2010

The magnetic poles or dip pole are computed from all the Gauss coefficients using an iterative method. Magnetic poles derived in this fashion are more closer to the experimentaly observed poles. Based on the current WMM model, the 2010 location of the north magnetic pole is 84.97°N and 132.35°W and the south magnetic pole is 64.42°S and 137.34°E. The Google map below illustrates the movement of the magnetic poles during 1590 to 2010 derived from the GUFM (1590 – 1980) and IGRF (1981 – 2010) models. The GUFM model (Jackson et al., 2000, Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 358, 957- 90.) covers the period 1590 -1990 and is based on ship log data. The path reflects the chaotic and independent movement of magnetic poles. For example, the present rate of progression of the north magnetic pole (55 km/year) is significantly higher than that of the South Pole.


Figure. Trace of the magnetic dip poles during 1590 - 2010 as derived from geomagnetic models. Click on the icons for the year.
The magnetic field from 1590 - 1980 (green line) is given by the GUFM model, while the field from 1980 - 2010 (red line) is given by the 10th generation of the IGRF. The locations of the poles (1590-2010) are available for download here: North Pole , South Pole.


www.ngdc.noaa.gov...


edit on 5/16/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: added map from link
edit on 5/16/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: added map from link, added links to data from 1590 on
edit on Wed May 16 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: --Off Topic, One Liners and General Back Scratching Posts--



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:26 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


Would all the snow and ice follow the poll? Where is it heading? And it seems strange that it's moving in a straight line across a sphere. Is the poll itself following something? Perhaps being dragged, with the suns polls. Cosmic energy bringing change.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Wifibrains
 


No it's the magnetic pole that changes, the Earth hasn't drastically tilted on it's axis.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:44 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


Also if the polls totally swap places, what would happen on an atomic level? Would the positive and negative parts of the atom swap? Thus bringing change all the way down. Like them Russian dolls that fit one inside the other. Each one slightly different.

www.google.co.uk... Q_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928&sei=oJGzT9j_C8eO8gPl6e2xCQ

The neutrino would stay put, presumably. A diagrammed of an atom looks incredibly like a solar system. And the flower like orbital pattern is all over English bank notes. On the £10 note it suggest time travel.
edit on 16-5-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-5-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by AgentSmith
 


Ok so then that suggests that the core has changed its axis, or is being pulled towards something, abit like one of them compass, spinning wheel thing they used to have in ships way back. The old lion is turning its head I heard somewhere.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:32 AM
link   
Very informative thread on the current status of the poles, still curious on its implications though. SF


reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:40 AM
link   
This has happend how many times throughout the planet's history?

Interesting. Cool that it is hapening when we can actually witness it.

I think we'll survive



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:45 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


It looks like the south pole is following the iron ore from Austrailia to china.....



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 





The pattern is very clear cut. It is neither coincidence nor conspiracy. It's called "systematic error." Look it up.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 09:53 AM
link   
What does all this mean to the temperature changes around the world ? Will north america become a more tropical place?
(Please say yes...
)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by hp1229
 



What does all this mean to the temperature changes around the world ? Will north america become a more tropical place? (Please say yes... )


It will have little to no effect on the Earth's climate. It is the magnetic pole that is wandering, not the axis of the Earth.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:08 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


Yeah but what effects would/will it have on our world? Any? Effects on people? I am woefully uneducated on this topic.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Ellie Sagan
 



Yeah but what effects would/will it have on our world? Any? Effects on people? I am woefully uneducated on this topic.


The geo-magnetic pole is constantly wandering. Its only real effect is on navigation; one must offset the compass readings on maps. It is believed that the geo-magnetic field weakens and reverses every 450,000 years or so. This might result in a bit of extra radiation from the solar wind, but it does not cause mass extinctions. If such a reversal were to happen now, it would be disruptive of our technology, but since much information is carried on fiber optic cables, it would not be too difficult to work around.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:22 AM
link   
reply to post by hp1229
 



Originally posted by hp1229
What does all this mean to the temperature changes around the world ? Will north america become a more tropical place?
(Please say yes...
)


This is an excellent question. People are addressing this as we speak:

Magnetic polar shifts causing massive global superstorms
www.helium.com...
Created on: February 04, 2011 Last Updated: February 06, 2011


...what drives planetary weather patterns is the climate and what drives the climate is the sun's magnetosphere and its electromagnetic interaction with a planet's own magnetic field.

When the field shifts, when it fluctuates, when it goes into flux and begins to become unstable anything can happen. And what normally happens is that all hell breaks loose.

Magnetic polar shifts have occurred many times in Earth's history. It's happening again now to every planet in the solar system including Earth.

The magnetic field drives weather to a significant degree and when that field starts migrating superstorms start erupting.
www.helium.com...



The Earth's northern magnetic pole was moving towards Russia at a rate of about five miles annually. That progression to the East had been happening for decades.

Suddenly, in the past decade the rate sped up. Now the magnetic pole is shifting East at a rate of 40 miles annually, an increase of 800 percent. And it continues to accelerate.

Recently, as the magnetic field fluctuates, NASA has discovered "cracks" in it. This is worrisome as it significantly affects the ionosphere, troposphere wind patterns, and atmospheric moisture. All three things have an effect on the weather.

Worse, what shields the planet from cancer-causing radiation is the magnetic field. It acts as a shield deflecting harmful ultra-violet, X-rays and other life-threatening radiation from bathing the surface of the Earth. With the field weakening and cracks emerging, the death rate from cancer could skyrocket and mutations of DNA can become rampant.
www.helium.com...



The Economist wrote a detailed article about the magnetic field and what's happening to it. In the article they noted:

"There is, however, a growing body of evidence that the Earth's magnetic field is about to disappear, at least for a while. The geological record shows that it flips from time to time, with the south pole becoming the north, and vice versa. On average, such reversals take place every 500,000 years, but there is no discernible pattern. Flips have happened as close together as 50,000 years, though the last one was 780,000 years ago. But, as discussed at the Greenland Space Science Symposium, held in Kangerlussuaq this week, the signs are that another flip is coming soon."

Discussing the magnetic polar shift and the impact on weather, the scholarly paper "Weather and the Earth's magnetic field" was published in the journal Nature. Scientists too are very concerned about the increasing danger of superstorms and the impact on humanity.
www.helium.com...


edit on 5/16/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: added "reply to" line, and typos
edit on Wed May 16 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:27 AM
link   
reply to post by hp1229
 



Originally posted by hp1229
What does all this mean to the temperature changes around the world ? Will north america become a more tropical place?
(Please say yes...
)


Here is more information:

2002 - Scientists may have detected the beginning of the field's next such reversal:
[www.scientificamerican.com...]
2005 - Movement of North Magnetic Pole is accelerating:
[www.physorg.com...]
2008 - Earth's Core, Magnetic Field Changing Fast, Study Says
[news.nationalgeographic.com...]
2008 - Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to Sun
[science.nasa.gov...]
2009 - North Magnetic Pole Moving Due to Core Flux
[news.nationalgeographic.com...]
2009 - The earth's climate is significantly affected by the planet's magnetic field:
[www.terradaily.com...]
Jan 2011 - British Geological Survey *Possible Pole Shift Occurring* South Atlantic Anomaly is Growing:
[www.bgs.ac.uk...]
2009 - A strong, highly-tilted interstellar magnetic field near the Solar System:
[www.nature.com...]
2009 - The solar system is passing through an interstellar cloud that physics says should not exist:
[science.nasa.gov...]

edit on 5/16/2012 by this_is_who_we_are because: typos, added reply to line



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by CrimsonMoon
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


what were the previous methods used to collect the data before the last 20 years?

It cant be ruled out that the data is is just being recorded now in finer detail.


Ohhhh jesus tapdancing christ!!

I know there's always one in every thread but the FIRST POST?!?!
REALLY!?!?!?


Aggggghhhh!!!!



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
 


Outside of Helium, which is clearly agenda driven, the only source cited that connects the geo-magnetic field with weather and climate is Knudsen and Riisger's study, which supports Svensmark's cosmic ray theory. It suggests that as the magnetic field diminishes, increased cosmic rays would lead to increased precipitation. That is a completely different issue than routine wandering.





new topics

top topics



 
48
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join