It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just hours after a top JPMorgan Chase executive retired in the wake of a stunning $2 billion trading loss, President Obama told the hosts of ABC’s “The View” that the bank’s risky bets exemplified the need for Wall Street reform.
JPMorgan is one of the best managed banks there is. Jamie Dimon, the head of it, is one of the smartest bankers we got and they still lost $2 billion and counting,” the president said. “We don’t know all the details. It’s going to be investigated, but this is why we passed Wall Street reform.”
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Next thing you know over 80% of OWS will vote for Obama nonetheless
But 99% of liberals should consider this as unnaceptable if they have any belief in consistency and their views
Otherwise they are not liberals or progressives, they are just partisan barbie dolls
They will accept whatever as long as the president is a Democrat, that's all they care about and they will defend that stance as being a lesser evil or some BS like that
Another document shows that earlier, in advance of a planned Occupy action at the Oakland, CA port facility on Nov. 2, DHS “went so far as to keep the Pentagon’s Northcom (Northern Command) in the intelligence loop.”
Given the subterfuge revealed in these documents that went into trying to create the illusion that the DHS was and is not coordinating a national campaign of spying, disruption and repression against Occupy activists, it is almost comical to find documents that show the DHS was in “direct communication with the White House” to obtain advance approval of public statements by DHS officials denying any DHS involvement in anti-Occupy actions.
These documents show that both DHS and one of that department’s police arms, the Federal Protective Service (FPS) were in direct contact with Portland, Oregon’s police chief and mayor, discussing how to deal with protesters who were in part on federal property. The coordination between the feds and the local police and political authorities were intense. Yet the approved statement sent to DHS from the White House read:
Any decisions on how to handle specifics (sic) situations are dealt with by local authorities in that location. If a protest area is located on Federal property and has been deemed unsanitary or unsafe by the General Services Administration (GSA) or city officials, and they make a decision to evacuate participants -- the Federal Protective Service (FPS) will work with those officials to develop a plan to ensure the security and safety of everyone involved.
Originally posted by neo96
Wow!
Occupy is the same liberal progressive rap that Americans have heard since the days of Teddy Roosevelt hey open up a history book and learn something.
Look them up and while your at it look of Wilson,Long,Franklin Roosevelt.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
I admit those who champion social engineering created this mess where more people are consuming the wealth of others instead of creating their own and those same people who see govermnment as the solution to all their problems........
They are the creators -create the problem so they can offer the "solution".
Originally posted by 1BornPatriot
reply to post by XPLodER
I think Occupy was traced back to Soros - I supported them at first until I started hearing things like occupy property that didn't belong to them and other communist slogans --- I'n addition, those hoodlums appear to be perfect build for Police Cadets... and who is hurting who and who is the terrorist .... Occupy quickly became a foe in my vocabulary -- a tool for the establishment.... I dont consider myself in either the 99% or the 1% -- I'm not communist and I'm not rich,.
What i admit is one day someone figured out they could get their political careers financed for life if they extorted business in America.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
I admit those who champion social engineering created this mess where more people are consuming the wealth of others instead of creating their own and those same people who see govermnment as the solution to all their problems........
They are the creators -create the problem so they can offer the "solution".