It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FaceLikeTheSun
reply to post by TheProphetMark
I think there is proof for God. There are great arguments for a theistic God and furthermore the use of logic and math. Before we can even start the convo, we will have to determine what you consider proof and evidence.
Originally posted by FaceLikeTheSun
reply to post by TheProphetMark
I think there is proof for God. There are great arguments for a theistic God and furthermore the use of logic and math. Before we can even start the convo, we will have to determine what you consider proof and evidence.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by FaceLikeTheSun
reply to post by TheProphetMark
I think there is proof for God. There are great arguments for a theistic God and furthermore the use of logic and math. Before we can even start the convo, we will have to determine what you consider proof and evidence.
Also, we have to ask just how many 'random' events does it take before we can start to consider that maybe those events are not so random after all.
Throughout mankind's history there have been stories of gods - thousands and thousands of them. From major societies to small, isolated tribes in the jungle, the idea of a god (or gods) has sprouted. Why?
Even if all the religions have reduced their gods to beings of illogical madness, the god-idea remains. Why?
Originally posted by NorEaster
reply to post by jiggerj
Man, since you put it that way, I'm totally playing my lotto numbers tonight.
Then I'm taking my winnings and buying scratch tickets with the whole thing. I can't lose!
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by FaceLikeTheSun
reply to post by TheProphetMark
I think there is proof for God. There are great arguments for a theistic God and furthermore the use of logic and math. Before we can even start the convo, we will have to determine what you consider proof and evidence.
Also, we have to ask just how many 'random' events does it take before we can start to consider that maybe those events are not so random after all.
Throughout mankind's history there have been stories of gods - thousands and thousands of them. From major societies to small, isolated tribes in the jungle, the idea of a god (or gods) has sprouted. Why?
Even if all the religions have reduced their gods to beings of illogical madness, the god-idea remains. Why?
The existence of a survival imperative, the existence of contextual precedence, and the existence of residual information combine to explain the lack of randomness inherit within progressive development. The issue of the concept of a creator being is less natural in its clear incompatibility with what can reasonably be seen as the normal dynamic response to history-building ramification. The fact that such a concept exists is strong evidence that it is based on a fact in some way or another.
I don't agree that progressive development is a hands-on science-fair project that keeps some ultra-sophisticated deity-level entity from being bored out of its divine mind. Still, I do see our own limited edition of creation as being the initiated effort of a non-corporeal intelligent mind with its own reason and ultimate agenda for what it knows will be the net result of what it has initiated. I believe that this intent exists within this specific reality confine's Residual Informational Continuum (which is the eternal data mass that defines this confine), and that humans have tapped into bits of this information over the many thousands of years (either by chance or by having it fed to them by post-corporeal humans with their own specific agendas concerning how to leverage this information) and that this information has been translated and retranslated many times over until it's become the basis of the wide range of theologies, religions, superstitions, and spiritualisms that we fight over.
I have a much more natural and much less mystical explanation for why this intelligent being initiated this specific reality confine, and once you get past your psychological aversion to this mundane explanation for what's always been considered to be holy and transcendent, the obviousness of it becomes inescapable. Especially when you've taken the time and effort to examine what drives everything else that exists, and directly apply those same drivers to this thing that also exists. All driven by the very same imperatives and directed by the same qualifiers. The mystery of it all dissolves pretty readily after that.edit on 5/12/2012 by NorEaster because: (no reason given)
I don't know about any of you, but for me this is WAY WAY WAY too many lucky things to happen to be purely random events
Originally posted by dusty1
If you rewind it all,
Alien origins and space seeding are just kicking the can further down the road.
Wow, um.....wow. Fear is NOT a good way to parent kids...neither is secrecy.....
I'll have to remember that the next time I read about a swimmer attacked by a shark and a tourist mauled on Safari by a lion. And if I ever somehow contract a tape worm it's clearly I who have dominion. Yes Randy, clearly, man has dominion
Our modern humanity doesn't even come close to them.
When they didn't have technology, music, games, and all that other crap to keep themselves occupied with; they thought about life; talked about it among their people, pondered about it so much that it changed them deep inside in a positive way and made them appreciate life, a lot more than how much we appreciate it because nowadays we just take everything for granted.
At least that's how most people are today.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Also, we have to ask just how many 'random' events does it take before we can start to consider that maybe those events are not so random after all.
"There are 456 OLD TESTAMENT AND NEW TESTAMENT PROPHECIES about the Messiah that were fulfilled by the life of Jesus Christ. The Bible has many that were written thousands of years before Jesus was born! Precise, detailed prophecies such as; where He would be born (Micah 5:2), how He would be born, (Isaiah 7:14) how He would die (Psalm 34:20), etc. And history has PROVEN, without ANY doubt whatsoever, they were fulfilled EXACTLY as the Bible had prophesied, hundreds of years earlier!"
The chances of just 48 out of the 456 prophecies being fulfilled in one person are 1 in 10 to the 157 power.
That's — 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
"According to Emile Borel, once one goes past one chance in 10^50, the probabilities are so small that it is impossible to think that they will ever occur..." LINK
"...what's the likelihood of a person predicting today the exact city in which the birth of a future leader would take place, well into the 21st century? This is indeed what the prophet Micah did 700 years before the Messiah. Further, what is the likelihood of predicting the precise manner of death that a new, unknown religious leader would experience, a thousand years from now - a manner of death presently unknown, and to remain unknown for hundreds of years? Yet, this is what David did in 1000 B.C.
Again, what is the likelihood of predicting the specific date of the appearance of some great future leader, hundreds of years in advance? This is what Daniel did, 530 years before Christ. ...Indeed, it may be possible for someone to fake one or two of the Messianic prophecies, but it would be impossible for any one person to arrange and fulfill all of these prophecies." LINK
"Any man who rejects Christ as the Son of God is rejecting a fact, proved perhaps more absolutely than any other fact in the world. God so thoroughly vindicated Jesus Christ that even mathematicians and statisticians, who were without faith, had to acknowledge that it is scientifically impossible to deny that Jesus is the Christ."
Originally posted by jiggerj
I have never gotten an answer to questions like: Where is Egypt's historical NON-religious records of every firstborn dying? Sure seems like if there are historical accounts of the pharoahs dating back to that time, then the mass deaths of all the firstborns would surely have been written about other than in the bible.
"It was also illegal to record any history in Egypt that made the Pharaoh look bad. That is why they did not record the God of the slaves whooping their butts. If any scribe did that, he probably would have been killed. As an Atheist friend of mine who loved Egypt told me, Egyptian history was basically propaganda."
LINK
Originally posted by InfoKartel
Were you around then to claim this now? I don't think so. All you have is texts that were written and your interpretation of the interpretation of the writer at that time(your own logic). Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you saying that people who follow the Bible do the same? So what's the difference then? The Bible does not make you, personally, into some kind of hero, but your own theories do, correct?
Also, why do you claim that people blindly follow the Bible? There is no blindly following the Bible.
Either you read it and you're not blind, or you don't read it and follow others interpretations. You also talk about blind faith in the same context, which is very telling. Because blind faith has nothing to do with ANY religion.
Originally posted by blueorder
no harm fella, but that sort of interpretation, if anything, leads me to think there may be something more than the physical
"It was also illegal to record any history in Egypt that made the Pharaoh look bad. That is why they did not record the God of the slaves whooping their butts. If any scribe did that, he probably would have been killed. As an Atheist friend of mine who loved Egypt told me, Egyptian history was basically propaganda.
Every question has an answer. Most of what has been told to you is just conspiracy theories. You would have to believe that Jesus copied Gandhi if these arguments were valid."
GreenSlugg 6 months ago Link
Originally posted by InfoKartel
reply to post by wildtimes
Wow, um.....wow. Fear is NOT a good way to parent kids...neither is secrecy.....
It's amazing how little you know.
The Bible teaches to have no fear. It teaches that secrecy is really bad. That's something that has struck me as awkward, all you folk who are against the Bible, haven't even read it in the first place...tell me, ow great atheistic scientists...how does one refute that which one has not read or experienced?
reply to post by Titen-Sxull
I'll have to remember that the next time I read about a swimmer attacked by a shark and a tourist mauled on Safari by a lion. And if I ever somehow contract a tape worm it's clearly I who have dominion. Yes Randy, clearly, man has dominion
Now you're just being silly. What is a zoo? What are pets? What is cattle?
This is just an observation, and not an attack. I have found that most atheists that debate the bible have studied it at great lengths while the religious merely take the words as truth without challenging the improbabilities and sheer impossibilities in the text.
Science = how things work. Religion = why things work.
3) How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4) Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
13) Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
3) Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
39) (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)
25) These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father.