It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The woman, in posing a question to Romney, asserted, “We have a president right now that is operating outside the structure of our Constitution.”
She was interrupted by applause from the crowd.
“I want to know," she said before turning to another audience member and saying, “Yeah, I do agree he should be tried for treason. But I want to know what you are going to be able to do to help restore balance between the three branches of government and what you’re going to be able to do to restore our Constitution in this country?”
Romney, after waiting for the applause to die down, answered the woman’s question without addressing the treason remark.
“Well, as I’m sure you do, I happen to believe that the Constitution was not just brilliant, but probably inspired,” he said. “I believe the same thing about the Declaration of Independence.”
He continued by criticizing Obama for suggesting that it would be unprecedented for the Supreme Court to overturn the healthcare law that Democrats enacted in 2010, which is now before the high court.
Originally posted by Starchild23
I see this thread as antagonistic, offering no real argument, only a challenge and a "come at me bro."
You've given us nothing to work with except an insult and the proof that it happened.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
what is the specific act in question ? because if it is some birther nonsense he was wise to avoid answering
reply to post by Starchild23
Just because someone can sprout flowers from their posterior and hand out promises like it's candy, does not mean they will stand by their word. Everything changes once you're in office and those corporations and sponsor come clamoring for you to return the favor, after they funded your election. Because believe me, if they want to, those corporations can take that power away just as fast as it was given. The government will turn against itself, biting the hand that serves the people, as long as that money flow keeps coming.
Originally posted by freakjive
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
what is the specific act in question ? because if it is some birther nonsense he was wise to avoid answering
She's talking about Obama making decisions that are normally cleared by congress first...such as the illegal activities that took place in Libya. Or the fact that he had an American citizen killed without ever facing a judge/jury.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
txs
agree on the libya thing, that was a page out of cheney's book, and total BS. don't know the citizen killing case, was that a guantanamo bay case ?
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
reply to post by Starchild23
Actually the OP's original message shows the nature of what you are dealing with, that being diversion and obfuscation. I am quite sure Romney is just another meat puppet in a long line of processed fools. I also believe if you asked Ron Paul if Obama should be charged with treason, he wouldn't flatly say yes, but I think he would say something concerning the destruction of the constitution under Obama. They all have to sidestep issues to some point until whichever one of them is elected POTUS. But, that being said, I still think Romney and Obama are both vile little jellyfish.
Cheers - Dave