New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union

I did a search and so that noone picked up on this so far, Iif I'm wrong my apologies.

Just what this country needs is to be much more like Europe. First, Obamacare now this? No wonder, I'm a polical agnostic.

Even many in Europe knows it was wrong to go the Euro, and now where do we want to go the "Amero".Really why do alot of Americans wish to be like Europe? Why can't we simply be America anymore. What was wrong with things the way they were, can anyone give me reasons we should look to be like Europe?

Europeans don't like us personally, so, they sure like seeing us spend money over there though, don't they?

What is it the 4 week vacation, lower retirement age? Just convince me why we need to be more like Europe.



Michael Snyder the American Dream

When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes that more “global governance” (the elite don’t like to use the term “global government”) will make the world a much better place.
At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

reply to post by 1loserel2


Good find OP.

However, you should elaborate in your post because it might not grab the attention it deserves.

The incremental approach mentioned in the article sheds a lot of light on the dark and sinister plans of this administration. I hope others will take the time to read the link.

I personally did not realize how far along this had gotten...

S&F

~Namaste

Its worse than that.

Here's the whole EO (scroll down to read it)

fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...

My god, it's not like it hasn't secretly been done for years guys.

I live in Canada, we do not have anymore Canadian products, except for things like, beer, liquor, syrups, fine foods & Candy and a few ski and snowboard companies. I really got a grasp on this situation when I spent 4 months in 2012 in the USA...The only thing i really noticed when it came to products, was that the USA has more varieties of products than we do. For instance, we have 3 types of snickers chocolate bars, the USA has 6....We have 6 varieties of Lay's potato chips, the USA has 12.

Almost everything that Canadians consume comes from the USA, which produces products mainly in China.

So ask yourself this question. wouldn't it make sense to abolish the boarders?

Sure it would put a lot of people out of work, but the USA is used to screwing its people over anyway. Canada's government is not that much better. We've been able to hide the #ty job we're doing just a wee bit better than the USA, that's all.

reply to post by 1loserel2


Simple, I will join the Texas Union when they cede from the NAU and aid those who fight to destroy it.
I'm sure the majority of USicans would offer no resistance.
We in the US are pretty laid back if someone else is doing the fighting for us, and if our conveniences are not interrupted that is.

This is the Agenda...it precedes the Rio + 20.

Theguardian.com

According to a leak of the draft agenda document seen by the Guardian, they will also be asked to negotiate a new agreement to protect oceans, approve an annual state of the planet report, set up a major world agency for the environment, and appoint a global "ombudsperson", or high commissioner, for future generations. Dozens of heads of state, political leaders and celebrities are expected to go to the UN's Rio+20 sustainable development meeting, to be held in Brazil in June.

Canada isn't really waiting for the USA to make a Global Government, we're actually waiting for the USA to sign the Ottawa Treaty banning Anti-Personnel Landmines, because while America stopped producing them they have a huge stockpile of them. If America signs the Ottawa Treaty then of course the UNSC will only have the weight of China and Russia not on the Ottawa Treaty, since the UK and France have signed it.

Since Japan, South Africa, Nigeria, Brazil and Germany have signed it as well the only country who hasn't signed it but is also considered likely to gain a Permanent Seat is India. Indonesia has signed it and as the 4th most populous nation in the world (as well as Muslim) it might be a better candidate than India, however Indonesia has only a bit of a land border in comparison to India, which has a border with 2 other nuclear-armed states (and that factors into why India doesn't want to sign the Ottawa treaty, Pakistan and China have not either).

Originally posted by misfitofscience
My god, it's not like it hasn't secretly been done for years guys.

I live in Canada, we do not have anymore Canadian products, except for things like, beer, liquor, syrups, fine foods & Candy and a few ski and snowboard companies. I really got a grasp on this situation when I spent 4 months in 2012 in the USA...The only thing i really noticed when it came to products, was that the USA has more varieties of products than we do. For instance, we have 3 types of snickers chocolate bars, the USA has 6....We have 6 varieties of Lay's potato chips, the USA has 12.

Almost everything that Canadians consume comes from the USA, which produces products mainly in China.

So ask yourself this question. wouldn't it make sense to abolish the boarders?

Sure it would put a lot of people out of work, but the USA is used to screwing its people over anyway. Canada's government is not that much better. We've been able to hide the #ty job we're doing just a wee bit better than the USA, that's all.

Erm, you're missing quite a few things, off the top of my head we also have Research in Motion, while kind of struggling, is distinctly Canadian. I think anyway, fwiw.

Make sense to take away the borders? I don't know, it may be a good or a bad thing to be honest but we know they only want to do this to consolidate power and essentially take over Canada's rich lands. Government doesn't really do anything to benefit the people, they just make it seem that way so we have to be quick to understand their actions because if we don't they will shift society without our permission yet again.

Originally posted by frazzle
Its worse than that.

Here's the whole EO (scroll down to read it)

fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...

here's some comments from the link:

On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order – Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and it’s so called trading partners.

What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders.

Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States.

AND

This is exactly what the Bolsheviks did to the Russian people in 1917. Now we have this new executive order for the implementation of laws not legislated by our Congress. If we were to allow ourselves to be disarmed by these international soviet socialists, the next step would be to eliminate everyone who refuses to acquiesce to collective slavery.

The E.O. is on the White House site --> PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION

the link address contains "2012/05/01" to confirm it's recent.

Yes, I would imagine the wording on the EO is exactly the same from both sources. Does the site it comes from have any bearing on what the EO will do? Do you approve of what it will do?

Originally posted by frazzle
Yes, I would imagine the wording on the EO is exactly the same from both sources. Does the site it comes from have any bearing on what the EO will do? Do you approve of what it will do?

It has a lot of double talk as usual.

But I am getting inferences and inklings of Agenda 21
(in Sec. 2. Coordination of International Regulatory Cooperation mainly)

(i) serve as a forum to discuss, coordinate, and develop a common understanding among agencies of U.S. Government positions and priorities with respect to:

(A) international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulatory actions;

(B) efforts across the Federal Government to support significant, cross-cutting international regulatory cooperation activities, such as the work of regulatory cooperation councils; and

(C) the promotion of good regulatory practices internationally, as well as the promotion of U.S. regulatory approaches, as appropriate; and

reply to post by xuenchen


Agenda 21 and more. We will rue this action and Obama's name will go down in history for it.

Read the actual announcement, not just bits and pieces of it:

www.whitehouse.gov...

We have started close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas.

the order makes clear that in eliminating such differences, we will respect domestic law and will not compromise U.S. priorities and prerogatives. Even while insisting on those priorities and prerogatives, we can eliminate pointless red tape. Today’s global economy relies on supply chains that cross national borders (sometimes more than once), and different regulatory requirements in different countries can significantly increase costs for companies doing business abroad. As the President’s Jobs Council recently noted, international regulatory cooperation canreduce these costs and help American businesses access foreign markets. Such cooperation can also help U.S. regulators more effectively protect the environment and the health and safety of the American people

Can't say any of that sounds particularly bad. Why shouldn't neighboring countries that engage in an enormous amount of trade try and harmonize regulations so that small businesses have less red tape to sift through?

As they expand our borders,
we will combine in numbers,
to reclaim our cultures.
As they think we are being fenced in,
we will regain our pride again.
We each have took our place,
and our culture for 400 years,
you have to laugh,
if they think they can change our history overnight,
we are tribes that already exist,
on the North American Continent.

Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
As they expand our borders,
we will combine in numbers,
to reclaim our cultures.
As they think we are being fenced in,
we will regain our pride again.
We each have took our place,
and our culture for 400 years,
you have to laugh,
if they think they can change our history overnight,
we are tribes that already exist,
on the North American Continent.

I like that part if it can work that way. People, like the water, seeking their own level.

Drawing arbitrary lines on a map that separated people from their families was always a huge mistake.

For what its worth, I think if Canadians are just a little patient, they will have the US handed to them free of charge in the largest non-violent takeover in history. Oh yes, there will be bloodshed, just not on a literal battlefield. In a very short time, I think most of us expect the financial carnage to ramp up exponentially. With nowhere to retreat except the aether, the failures in Washington can then drag this country over millions of corporate corpses and personal dead bank accounts to a point where it could probably all be had for less than the Louisiana Purchase. The US is in such a severiously rapid slide into oblivion, Canada can soon simply swoop in and pick up all the pieces it wants. Possibly the real question is why would they? What would they want with red, white, and blue remnants, and aren't the people in Canada too smart to want us anyway?

Someone earlier had it right, though. Those of us fortunate to already live in the great nation of Texas will become the newest country just south of The Disunited States of America...........and we will thrive!!!

reply to post by 1loserel2


A certain group of people in the US are in love with the idea of Europe. They think Europe is more sophisticated and intellectual than we are, they think European socialism is the cat's meow and we should be like them.
By the way there was an Axelrod in the original Bolshevik Revolution.

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by frazzle
Its worse than that.

Here's the whole EO (scroll down to read it)

fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...

here's some comments from the link:

On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order – Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and it’s so called trading partners.

What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders.

Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States.

AND

This is exactly what the Bolsheviks did to the Russian people in 1917. Now we have this new executive order for the implementation of laws not legislated by our Congress. If we were to allow ourselves to be disarmed by these international soviet socialists, the next step would be to eliminate everyone who refuses to acquiesce to collective slavery.

The E.O. is on the White House site --> PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION

the link address contains "2012/05/01" to confirm it's recent.

i was reading about this.

Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial.

fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...

my first thought was to tell the international army good luck implementing that in America. between our people and our own military, who are sworn to uphold the laws of the constitution and live by that, they won't have a chance in hell of pulling that off.

Originally posted by stanguilles7
Read the actual announcement, not just bits and pieces of it:

www.whitehouse.gov...

We have started close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas.

Wait...NANOTECHNOLOGY!!!!????

the order makes clear that in eliminating such differences, we will respect domestic law and will not compromise U.S. priorities and prerogatives. Even while insisting on those priorities and prerogatives, we can eliminate pointless red tape. Today’s global economy relies on supply chains that cross national borders (sometimes more than once), and different regulatory requirements in different countries can significantly increase costs for companies doing business abroad. As the President’s Jobs Council recently noted, international regulatory cooperation canreduce these costs and help American businesses access foreign markets. Such cooperation can also help U.S. regulators more effectively protect the environment and the health and safety of the American people

Can't say any of that sounds particularly bad. Why shouldn't neighboring countries that engage in an enormous amount of trade try and harmonize regulations so that small businesses have less red tape to sift through?

Actually yes, this was posted earlier .. but as someone pointed out in that thread, an executive order isn't a law and isn't really even enforceable ...