It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hoochymama
Outkast, what would Gary Johnson Say??
Originally posted by hab22
I got proof Outkast. From Wikipedia of all places. Link below for proof. At the 2008 Republican national convention, 14 delegates abstained from voting for John McCain in the first and only round of voting.
en.wikipedia.org...
Here's some more proof.
"As set out in the Rules of the Republican Party, delegates have the ability to vote according to the delegates’ preference, even if that is contrary to the outcome of each state’s primary. According to one source, the legal counsel for the Republican National Convention in 2008 stated: “[The] RNC does not recognize a state’s binding of national delegates, but considers each delegate a free agent who can vote for whoever they choose.” Thus, if a delegate were to challenge his or her ability to vote as a free agent, he or she would have grounds under Rule 38."
www.fairvote.org...-dJNm3MTD
How about that one, Outkast. Two proofs in one post! Go Ron Paul. Viva la revolution!
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by hab22
They would not have grounds under Rule 38. Rule 38 pertains to the unit rule. The unit rule is a practice where a state will cast all of their votes in favor of the candidate with the majority of votes from that state's delegates. If there is a delegate who is bound to another candidate they would be forced to vote for the majority. This is what is Rule 38 prevents.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by Xcalibur254
Now you are simply making excuses. Only one thing matters in that post - the fact that delegates ABSTAINED FROM VOTING.
Stop denying and claiming ignorance to the face. You and Outkast has been proven wrong and have been unable to show any evidence on the contrary. Its game over.
Originally posted by Julie Washington
Here is an excellent site with the beakdown by State's binding rules:
sites.google.com...
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
Who's beating the dead horse, now.
The NRC rules trump the state rules!!!!!!!!!!!
THE END .
Originally posted by stirling
Jeebus!
Thanks Out cast for answering my question of the GOP numbers....(this is still a bone of contention i wouldnt want to see anyone pick over.)....I thought it was black and white somewhere....but maybe not hey?
You are doing admirably explaining to the uninitiated whats really going on....
I had thought there was a Ron Paul groundswell of somewhat greater proportions.....
There may be hope in the very fact that Dr Paul has been so obviously discriminated against and conspired against in so many different primaries......The whole dishonest mess is getting its dirty laundry hung out for the nation to see.....The MSM is hard put to keep the lid on such obvious chicanery ..........
It is becomming far more aparent to the people just how corrupt the system has become, and it may well yield a good old fashioned house cleaning in the near future.
Would the write in ballot of a majority of americans be accepted for election of a president??
Would they even be recorded electronically?
Its all sooo bizare!
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Ok, explain away the fact that Florida change their primary date in 2008 and the RNC took away 50% of Floridas
delegates in the 2008 convention.
The RNC will always trump state rules.
Originally posted by hoochymama
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
In one of your posts on another thread you mentioned the best choice for POTUS would be Gary Johnson, or something to that effect. Or maybe you were talking about his Voting Record.