It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rivera reveals Loyola was involved with the Occult group known as the “Alumbrados” which means “Enlightened” in English or in Latin “Illuminati”.
Rivera claimed “Once Ignatius de Loyola” came into power in the Vatican, he placed his Occult organisation, “The Illuminati” under the umbrella of Roman Catholic Institution. The Illuminati secretly became the most important branch of the Jesuit order.
Loyola came to control the Illuminati before founding the Jesuit order. The Illuminati secretly became the most important branch of the Jesuit order. Modern day Jesuits also remained inextricably rooted in the occult – and allied to and at the service of the Church of Rome.
Weishaupt was a professor at the Jesuit University of Ingolstadt (Jesuit stronghold in Bavaria) It is disputed by “Still” that he was actually a Jesuit, however Rivera is clear that Weishaupt was a true member of the Jesuits.
Weishaupt followed the communist teachings of Rousseau, and like Rousseau he was a
Freemason. In 1771 he was indoctrinated in the Egyptian Occult.
Weishaupt formed a group called the “Illuminati” in 1776, which was an Occult society linked to Freemasonry. His aim was to use a facade of Christianity to attract many well-intentioned, influential people into his ranks.
Professing Christians within the lower levels of the Illuminati were taught that the Illuminati were working for Christian unity throughout the world. However, Weishaupt and a select few were in reality hatching a satanic plot to bring in his own version of the Occult New World Order, with a “Return to Nature” and the establishment of “reason” as man’s religion. In practice, it meant a dictatorship led by Weishaupt and his Brethren.
All of this was to be achieved by the destruction of existing society, government, monarchies and religion by means of revolution and a state of anarchy. Only the highest initiates of the Illuminati knew these objectives.
Rivera claims that Weishaupt was a Jesuit all along, and that the apparent severing of
connections with the Jesuits was a ploy. He also goes on to state: that the name of Weishaupt’s apparently new society , was the same as that which Loyola had belonged to and had placed under the cover of the Jesuits.
THE MYSTERIES, FREEMASONRY, JESUITS & THE E.U. – A HISTORY, Written & Researched By Mizzie Jones
Little remains to mark the passing of the Jesuits' Reductions. The Old World Order had succeeded in killing off the Illuminati's great and noble vision.
There seems to be some issue in accessing your video (only available for private viewing?)
I am currently reading Tom Horn's book 'Petrus Romanus: The final pope is here' and have to say it is very good and recommend you check it out.
If God loves everybody, what does God have against deformed people? (Lev. 21:16-23)
Why would God prevent people from hearing his word? (Isa. 6:10, John 12:39-40)
Have you read Eric Jon Phelps book, 'Vatican Assassins' before?
You don't need content coming from a bad source.
I would rather read their content and form my own opinion of the truthfulness and accuracy of it then merely dismiss something that could be immensely powerful information because of attacks that are personal in nature and not targeted at the message content.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by JesuitGarlic
You have decided to look into the abyss.
I would not recommend anyone following you.
I didn't say that.
....unless you can provide solid evidence that everything he says is lies despite him quoting from the most authoritative sources . . .
Do you not think I should be reading books from the authoritative source on Satanism Alister Crowley either.
I really don't know what kind of Abyss you are referring to.
Huh! . . and so you want to teach evil . . ugh.
. . . so many Christians and non-Christians have seriously lacking knowledge when it comes to aspects of religion and all the devices of Satan around.
By the time I reached Bou Saâda and came to the twentieth Aethyr, I began to understand that these visions were, so to speak, cosmopolitan. They brought all systems of magical doctrine into harmonious relation. The symbolism of Asiatic cults; the ideas of the Cabbalists, Jewish and Greek; the arcana of the gnostics; the pagan pantheon, from Mithras to Mars; the mysteries of ancient Egypt; the initiations of Eleusis; Scandinavian saga; Celtic and Druidical ritual; Mexican and Polynesian traditions; the mysticism of Molinos no less than that of Islam, fell into their proper places without the slightest tendency to quarrel. The whole of the past Aeon appeared in perspective and each element thereof surrendered its sovereignty to Horus, the Crowned and Conquering Child, the Lord of the Aeon announced in The Book of the Law.
These visions thus crystallized in dramatic form the theoretical conclusion which my studies of comparative religion had led me to adumbrate. The complexity of the whole vast subject resolved itself into shining simplicity, I saw with my own eyes and heard with my own ears the truth in terms of Time. I understood directly that the formula of Osiris necessarily assumed all sorts of apparently incompatible forms as it was applied to different conditions of race, climate and similar conditions. I saw also that Horus might reconcile all religions, it being possible now to bring all countries to agree on a few fundamental principles.
'Confessions' chapter 66. p617, 618. Crowley
I think so. That's just my opinion. Don't really see the point in it. People can find it interesting, like watching a train wreck. Doesn't save anyone.
Was Veith's readings into Pike and Blavatsky, Baily ect a fruitless task consorting with demons or has he used this knowledge to produce a fruitful work?
Huh? Then don't learn it, use what you already know.
It is how we use the knowledge of good and evil that counts, not just learning it.
Originally posted by JesuitGarlic
reply to post by jmdewey60
I can't see how he is a Khazarian Zionist (Satanic belief system loyal to the Vatican) when he spends his whole time denouncing the Vatican. It doesn't matter if I think he is a Christian or not, it doesn't mean that his research is wrong.
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by JesuitGarlic
You have a really nice litany, coupled with much biblical knowledge. Would you not be better served preaching to others like you from the pulpit, with perhaps TV cameras on you? You are simply doing the same thing I do....take a passage from an Ancient book of tales and try to make logical sense of it. I found things in the bible that would curl your toes, and have seen first hand the doings of religious people around me. We just have to agree to disagree on Theology principles.
An Historical Perspective
Shortly after the death of Mohammed in AD 632, according to Columbia University Professor, D. M. Dunlop, Arab armies began a campaign northward, sweeping "through the wreckage of two empires and carrying all before them till they reached the great mountain barrier of the Caucasus. This barrier once
passed," Dunlop observes, "the road lay open to the lands of eastern Europe." 2
Had the Caliphate (the armies of the Muslim Caliph) surmounted that immense geological deterrent unchallenged, the history of Europe and, indeed, the rest of the Judeo-Christian world would have been vastly different than it now is.
It was at the Caucasus, however, that the Arabs encountered the Khazars, initiating a war that lasted over a century and effectively prevented Europe from becoming Islamic. So powerful, socially and militarily, were the Khazars that, as Kevin Alan Brook relates in his work The Jews of Khazaria, "a 10th-century emperor of the Byzantines [Roman Empire], Constantine Porphyrogenitus, sent correspondence to the Khazars marked with a gold seal
worth 3 solidi - more than the 2 solidi that always accompanied letters to the Pope of Rome, the Prince of the Rus, and the Prince of the Hungarians."
I believe that despite the actions of those people in power trying corrupt the Word or its interpretation that all through the centuries since the original apostles that in one form or another it has been preserved.
The earliest original manuscripts have been so severely damaged that they are unreadable now because they were copied so much and translated so widely into many various languages.
Biblical scholars long ago accepted that Mark's Gospel was the first of the New Testament gospels written, and that it must have been written in Greek. They also noticed that whenever Matthew's Gospel and Luke's Gospel agreed with Mark, they almost always used the same words in Greek. Most scholars see this as evidence that Matthew and Luke are largely derived from Mark.
Scholars then noticed that many passages in Matthew and Luke also contain other sayings that are identical in their Greek wording, although the sayings are placed in different places, time and context by each of the two authors. They realised that the two authors must have been using a common source for those sayings, and that must be a written source, in fact written in Greek, for the wording of the sayings to be so consistent.
German scholars suggested a hypothetical document that they called the Quelle (or 'Q') Document. Scholars began to analyse the two gospels to see if they could piece together the original wording of the Q Document. Clearly it was almost entirely a book of sayings, since it contained no reference to the life of Jesus, or to any of his works. Scholars have been unable to explain the fact that Q has a central theme was the killing of the prophets but it never refers to the crucifixion or resurrection of Jesus.
I know that autowrench tries to allude to the fact it was perverted due to who was involved in the editing of it of the English version from King James.
You have to really question why would the Vatican arrange an elaborate plot to assassinate King James (the gunpowder plot) if the bible which he was going to put out was a corrupted one.