It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Despite efforts to regulate against the revolving door in the US, it became far more common during the Bush administration when George W. Bush appointed unprecedented numbers of corporate executives and business lobbyists to government posts, including regulatory agencies with power over decisions affecting the environment. For example, Philip Cooney became chief of staff of the White House Council on Environmental Quality for George W. Bush after serving as a lawyer and lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute. In his government position he amended government scientific reports to downplay the role of greenhouse gas emissions in causing global warming. After he resigned his government position he was hired by Exxon Mobil.
“Business-managed democracies are those in which the political and cultural arrangements are managed in the interests of business.” Sharon Beder, 2009.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by ANOK
BTW, the globalists have been using organized labor in very destructive ways for more than a century.
TO THE DEVASTATING HURT OF LABOR.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by dragonridr
Hideous.
What business do any universities have donating to any politician of any flavor?
Corrupt by definition, imho.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Define corrupt.
Often, when a person says corrupt, they actually mean "doesn't do what I want them to do according to my beliefs", rather than actually breaking any law or ethical behavior..
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Define corrupt.
Often, when a person says corrupt, they actually mean "doesn't do what I want them to do according to my beliefs", rather than actually breaking any law or ethical behavior..
Corruption is still corruption even when it is legalized.
Ethical and moral practice are not defined by law, they are defined by the society in which acts are perpetrated, and in our case, they are unacceptable to the majority.
There are clear conflicts of interest here, and the mere hint of impropriety is enough to act to remove said officials from their position. Elected officials SHOULD BE beyond reproach. Clearly, this standard has been allowed to erode and elected officials believe that as long as they can keep people distracted, or make it look "normal" then they can continue as they are making special deals and profiteering from their position of trust.
I firmly believe that those politicians are heading for a major wake-up call in the coming two years. People are wanking up to the open corruption throughout our governments, and the people will remove it whether these politicians like the idea or not.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by ANOK
It does not read like you understand what the Venn Diagrams are illustrating.
It sounds like you are blaming one side of the equation
1 = 1
The diagrams are illustrating, proving, actually,
that
THE WHOLE STRUCTURE, THE WHOLE SCHEME, THE WHOLE ORGANISM
IS THE SAME THING.
It's all part of the MARXIST, SATANIC, GLOBALIST OCTOPUS
BIG GOVERNMENT = BIG MONOPOLISTIC CONGLOMERATE PSEUDO-CAPITALISM = BIG GOVERNMENT
One did not cause the other.
The globalists engineered the whole thing as one tyrannical, corrupt organism . . . two sides of the same coin.
Evidently you could perhaps learn something from their quotes in their own words and publications over the last 110+ years:
twoday.net...
I encourage you to read at least 30% of them and preferably 75% or more.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
BTW, the globalists have been using organized labor in very destructive ways for more than a century.
TO THE DEVASTATING HURT OF LABOR.
Originally posted by ideasarebulletproof
reply to post by Asktheanimals
If, by your statement, removing laws helps keep things like this from happening, exactly what laws would you get rid of that would in any way fix this problem?
Honestly that makes zero sense to me, but please explain your position.
Thanks.