It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ending up as working poor, is a step up from being among the non-working poor.
Originally posted by MrXYZDay care would not cost the state more than paying for the other benefits. What it would do is dump hundreds of thousands of people into the workplace...a workplace that is already suffering from high unemployment rates as it is. What jobs does he expect them to do? A lot of those welfare mothers have very little education, and jobs aren't exactly easy to come by at the moment. They would likely end up as WORKING POORS.
Originally posted by MrXYZEnd result?
- Kids see their moms less
- Daycare providers make a fortune (somebody check his donors list...but of course we can't track SuperPACs)
- States save a bit most likely
- Welfare recipients turn into working poors
This should all be paid work. Your idea would create a state subsidized labor pool in those areas eliminating paid jobs.
I think anyone on public welfare should at the very least be required to participate in community volunteer programs. This would be a great way to provide assistance to the elderly at home and in nursing homes, day care centers, animal shelters, etc. I'm sure there are many ways their services could be put to use within their communities to earn their public assistance and would be a great deal better for their children to see them being productive, rather than not.
Originally posted by xuenchen
He says he wants to give them dignity.
What's wrong with that ?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Stay home with your child, that's fine. Just say NO to stealing from the taxpayers.
Originally posted by TheMindWar
Yeah, nothing like seperating mother from child, how they love to do that.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by NoAngel2u
There is so much about your post that i want to star as a show of support, but it is negated by this:
This should all be paid work. Your idea would create a state subsidized labor pool in those areas eliminating paid jobs.
I think anyone on public welfare should at the very least be required to participate in community volunteer programs. This would be a great way to provide assistance to the elderly at home and in nursing homes, day care centers, animal shelters, etc. I'm sure there are many ways their services could be put to use within their communities to earn their public assistance and would be a great deal better for their children to see them being productive, rather than not.
Ending up as working poor, is a step up from being among the non-working poor.
Have you read any of my other posts in this very thread concerning corporations? Obviously not, neither have you read any of my posts regarding the evils of corporations. Nice attempt at deflection though. Now, how about addressing the actual topic?
Originally posted by John_Rodger_Cornman
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Stay home with your child, that's fine. Just say NO to stealing from the taxpayers.
Originally posted by TheMindWar
Yeah, nothing like seperating mother from child, how they love to do that.
Yet no anguish over Goldman Sachs stealing trillions in tax payer bailouts? Then get tax credits on top of that.
Nice Psyop though.
Get the God damned(I mean this literally) federal government out of the way and let the free market reassert itself without their pro-corporate biased interference and watch jobs spring up like weeds.
Originally posted by John_Rodger_Cornman
What if there are not enough jobs to go around?
A volunteer program would put people helping out in areas that are usually short staffed due to corporate penny pinching putting profit before people, or supplemental hands on for communities w/o the funds to afford additional staff. See it however you will, but I like the idea of people making a contribution.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by NoAngel2u
There is so much about your post that i want to star as a show of support, but it is negated by this:
This should all be paid work. Your idea would create a state subsidized labor pool in those areas eliminating paid jobs.
I think anyone on public welfare should at the very least be required to participate in community volunteer programs. This would be a great way to provide assistance to the elderly at home and in nursing homes, day care centers, animal shelters, etc. I'm sure there are many ways their services could be put to use within their communities to earn their public assistance and would be a great deal better for their children to see them being productive, rather than not.
Maybe you don't see the inherent double think required to hold this position?
Originally posted by NoAngel2u
]A volunteer program would put people helping out in areas that are usually short staffed due to corporate penny pinching putting profit before people, or supplemental hands on for communities w/o the funds to afford additional staff. See it however you will, but I like the idea of people making a contribution.
I suppose it shouldn't be called a volunteer program lol so perhaps a mandatory contribution program. Perhaps the Required Reciprocity Program
There needs to be some sort of exchange, otherwise we are simply giving them the bread of shame.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by NoAngel2u
Ending up as working poor, is a step up from being among the non-working poor.
No it isn't!! If you can live of welfare, why would you voluntarily give that up for a working poor job...one that by its very definition doesn't make enough for you to live on? Read the definition of working poor!!
I guess you didn't read my last line?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Maybe you don't see the inherent double think required to hold this position?
Originally posted by NoAngel2u
]A volunteer program would put people helping out in areas that are usually short staffed due to corporate penny pinching putting profit before people, or supplemental hands on for communities w/o the funds to afford additional staff. See it however you will, but I like the idea of people making a contribution.
I suppose it shouldn't be called a volunteer program lol so perhaps a mandatory contribution program. Perhaps the Required Reciprocity Program
Required volunteerism is an oxymoron. They are antithetical to each other.
Those positions should just be "jobs" with remuneration involved or strictly "volunteer volunteers" so to speak.
I suppose it shouldn't be called a volunteer program lol so perhaps a mandatory contribution program. Perhaps the Required Reciprocity Program