It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ken10
reply to post by MrXYZ
Twice now you have mentioned "sea level rises" , Yet I bet you haven't even bothered to think about it !
For instance the Amazon river alone spews out 1 billion tons of sediment into the sea each year, That displaces water, then add all the other rivers that are doing the same ?
Then we have continual coastal erosion which is displacing water ?
Then we have the millions of boats sitting on the ocean, which are displacing water too ?
When you think about this it becomes obvious sea levels MUST rise.edit on 11-4-2012 by ken10 because: (no reason given)
You do realize that an engineer has no clue about climate and weather, right? A "systems analyst" has no clue about rising seawater levels.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by ken10
reply to post by MrXYZ
Twice now you have mentioned "sea level rises" , Yet I bet you haven't even bothered to think about it !
For instance the Amazon river alone spews out 1 billion tons of sediment into the sea each year, That displaces water, then add all the other rivers that are doing the same ?
Then we have continual coastal erosion which is displacing water ?
Then we have the millions of boats sitting on the ocean, which are displacing water too ?
When you think about this it becomes obvious sea levels MUST rise.edit on 11-4-2012 by ken10 because: (no reason given)
Yet those rivers have existed for a LOOOOOONG time, and the seawater level rise can't be explained through them because of it
Read the links I posted, they explain in detail (scientifically) why the rate of climate change is unprecedented.
.WHERE would the extra water come from to make sea levels rise ! ....what is the machine making H2O ?
Originally posted by OccamAssassin
reply to post by ken10
.WHERE would the extra water come from to make sea levels rise ! ....what is the machine making H2O ?
Glacial melt?
H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS
H. Leighton Steward
Independent Director
EOG Resources
Houston , TX
Sector: BASIC MATERIALS / Independent Oil & Gas
76 Years Old
Mr. Steward has extensive experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry, having served in various senior management roles with The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, a publicly traded oil and gas exploration and production company, including President, Chief Operating Officer and, from 1989 until its acquisition by Burlington Resources, Inc. in 1997, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Steward subsequently served as Vice Chairman of Burlington Resources, a publicly traded oil and gas exploration, production and development company, until his retirement in 2000. Mr. Steward is former Chairman of the U.S. Oil and Gas Association and the Natural Gas Supply Association, and is currently an honorary director of the American Petroleum Institute. Mr. Steward is also currently an author-partner of Sugar Busters, LLC, a provider of seminars, books and products related to helping people follow a healthy and nutritious lifestyle, and Chairman of the non-profit corporations Plants Need CO2 and CO2 Is Green, providers of information related to carbon dioxide?s impact on the global climate and the plant and animal kingdoms.
First, the obvious: The "extra CO2 is good for plants" argument is completely nuts, unless you enjoy wildfires and think Virginia Beach would look better under 30 to 90 meters of seawater.
As for H. Leighton, I know why he likes to call himself "retired" - makes him seem like he's not the active part of Big Oil that he really is - but I'm not clear why Politico reporter Darren Goode repeats it here. Steward is a member of the board of directors of oil & gas company EOG Resources, where he's made millions of dollars.
H. Leighton is also trying to have it both ways on ownership of the letter. He told Goode he didn't organize it & isn't a spokesman, but hours later he emailed his PlantsNeedCO2.org list bragging about "our announcements" and media appearances.
……
Texas A&M atmospheric sciences professor Andrew Dessler told POLITICO that he did in fact meet with the 75 or so retirees at Goddard last October — along with University of Houston professor Barry Lefer and fellow Texas A&M professor John Nielsen-Gammon — and came away less than impressed.
“These people are well meaning, but they don’t seem to realize that climate science takes years of full-time work to actually get to know,” he said. “They really don’t understand anything about the climate system. They understand less than the first-year grad students that come out of my classes.”
Originally posted by MrXYZ
The hilarious part of this letter? The large majority of people who signed don't even have an education that would allow them to assess the thing properly in the first placeedit on 11-4-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
Draconic fines is the only way to initiate change.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
There are no major scientific bodies that doubt the. existence of AWG.... It is proven beyond reasonable doubt and yes all those scientitists could be wrong. But for the time being I will trust them. It is science that allows me to sit here tapping in front of a laptop. Science has bought us so much, why should I not heed the warnings of science..
I dont get why peeps get so upset about this. If we reduce CO2 levels and nothing happens so what they planet is cleaner...... Its not a risk worth taking...
edit on 11-4-2012 by purplemer because: (no reason given)