Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by SonOfTheLawOfOne
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
There are no major scientific bodies that doubt the. existence of AWG.... It is proven beyond reasonable doubt and yes all those scientitists
could be wrong. But for the time being I will trust them. It is science that allows me to sit here tapping in front of a laptop. Science has bought us
so much, why should I not heed the warnings of science..
I dont get why peeps get so upset about this. If we reduce CO2 levels and nothing happens so what they planet is cleaner...... Its not a risk worth
edit on 11-4-2012 by purplemer because: (no reason given)
I'd like to see the "beyond a reasonable doubt" proof about man-made global warming.
I have never seen any absolute evidence or the subject would no longer be debated. In fact, the "proof" by some universities and groups was proven to
be doctored if I remember correctly... so I hope your proof is better than that.
WRONG. YOu don't remember at all! There was never ever any evidence of doctored proof. That was what the skeptics claimed and other skeptics
regurgitated and re-posted as if "the truth". The so called doctoring was a frank and open discussion in email form about how to counter the lies
presented by the skeptics......ironically enough. Needles to say if the skeptics resort to dirty tactics then a frank discussion will result in the
contemplation of similar tactics.
There is plenty of evidence you either choose to ignore or not, your choice, to be informed or ignorant. If you are a US citizen it is highly likely
you have been brainwashed by the lies about GW that your government fed you. Now get this : the US government ADMITTED to distorting the evidence
about global warming !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and still the skeptics regurtitated the lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jaw dropping stuff.
So 31,000 scientists from all over the world, who risk their professional reputations and possibly their careers, all signed a petition because us
Americans are brainwashed.
Speaking of choosing to ignore evidence...
Read some of it and you'll see for yourself. You have no idea what you are talking about.
How about some facts, shall we?
The MOST reliable form of temperature change measurement is through the lower troposphere, which we have been measuring with very precise instruments
for a number of years. (25 or so I believe) Since those measurements began, there has been NO NOTICEABLE change in temperature. Changes in the
troposphere are the best indicator for global temperature changes because ground-based measuring devices are easily corrupted by localized heating,
especially the kind seen in cities, which is where a majority of the ground stations are based. There are also too many places where ground-based
measuring can't be done due to locality, which is why measurements from the troposphere are more accurate.
What about the climatic optimum? Oh, I'm sure you won't hear anything about that, because it's the nail in the coffin for this debate... also, how is
it that from 800-1200 AD, during the age of the Vikings, the Earth's temperatures were warmer than any other time recorded by humans? Had it not been
for those warmer temps, the Vikings would not have been able to settle in Greenland.
Last but not least, what about the failed Kyoto Protocol, which would cost hundreds of trillions of dollars over the next 100 years, only to reduce
temperatures by .14 degrees??? Who is the winner there... if you still can't figure it out, it's the CORPORATIONS who stand to gain the most from
these ridiculous laws and taxes, not you or I. In the end, they will be richer, the planet will be hotter, and we'll be wondering why everything we
did changed nothing.
You make some bold claims but provide not a single shred of proof. Both you and the previous poster I replied to present no facts, no evidence, no
links to your claims, just here-say.
Please, deny ignorance and see the facts I'm presenting. I've already debunked one of the claims that no major scientific bodies discount man made
global warming...Instead of claiming lies by skeptics, consider that if it were just a lie, why did the head of the lying institution resign? Just
because of skeptics?
Forget that there are thousands of variables that go into a climate model today to predict LOCAL weather, and WE STILL CAN'T FORECAST IT CORRECTLY!!!
But you have the arrogance to sit here and claim that we can predict the climate change across the whole planet? Our tools are still archaic in that
regard, but I suppose you'll keep feeding the Jolly "Green" Giants your hard earned tax dollars.
edit on 11-4-2012 by SonOfTheLawOfOne because: (no reason given)