It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blocula
Save your troll labeling for the elves,gnomes and faries and thanx for highlighting one of my most popular threads...
Originally posted by blocula
My computer crashed when i was only half way finished with my opening post and it took about ten minutes for me to fix it...modern day progress?...but its completed now and i added in some more velocities...
Originally posted by Foxe
Throw on that the Galaxy itself is moving about 1,342,161.78 miles an hour in it's own direction.
"Airy's failure" (Reference - Proc. Roy. Soc. London v 20 p 35). Telescopes have to be very slightly tilted to get the starlight going down the axis of the tube because of the earth's "speed around the sun". Airy filled a telescope with water that greatly slowed down the speed of the light inside the telescope and found that he did not have to change the angle of the telescope. This showed that the starlight was already coming in at the original measured angle so that no change was needed. This demonstrated that it was the stars moving relative to a stationary earth and not the fast orbiting earth moving relative to the comparatively stationary stars. If it was the telescope moving he would have had to change the angle.
(Imagine the telescope like a tube, sloped so that the light from one star hits the bottom of the tube. Even if the starlight is slowed down inside the tube (using water), it will still hit the bottom of the tube because its direction is already determined. If it were the tube that was moving, slowing down the starlight would mean that the angle of the tube would have to change for the light to hit the bottom of the tube.)
Airy's experiment proved that the starlight was already coming into the earth at an angle, being carried along by the rotating aether.
www.geocentricuniverse.com...
Airy discovered that there was no change in the aberration through the refracting water in a supposedly "moving" earth. So what did it show then? It showed that only one side was moving and since that was the star side, it means the earth was stationary all along!
Just like those in the past who refused to believe that the earth was flat and were killed for their beliefs and just like those who refused to believe that the earth was the center of creation and were killed for their beliefs,i refuse to believe most of what they are telling us about reality and slowly but surely,what they are telling us are facts today,will be proven to have been false tomorrow...
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Your OP makes this thread at first belong here.
Since you are refusing to accept the VERY BASIC science that has been explain to you for 3 pages, and have now shown that you never really intended to learn anything, but instead have a very HIGHLY SPECULATIVE belief instead (that everything is static, and nothing in our universe is actually moving). Then this thread should be moved to the Skunk Works.
Originally posted by blocula
Just like those in the past who refused to believe that the earth was flat and were killed for their beliefs and just like those who refused to believe that the earth was the center of creation and were killed for their beliefs,i refuse to believe most of what they are telling us about reality and slowly but surely,what they are telling us are facts today,will be proven to have been false tomorrow...
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Your OP makes this thread at first belong here.
Since you are refusing to accept the VERY BASIC science that has been explain to you for 3 pages, and have now shown that you never really intended to learn anything, but instead have a very HIGHLY SPECULATIVE belief instead (that everything is static, and nothing in our universe is actually moving). Then this thread should be moved to the Skunk Works.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by eriktheawful
If i could get up high enough i could blow around portions of little clouds with air exhaled from my lungs, but the earth,supposedly moving 1,118 x faster that a bullet fired from a high powered rifle,doesnt effect them at all? somethings very wrong with what they are leading us to believe,imo...
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by Bob Sholtz
If rockets are propelling themselves against the fuel they expel,in the earths atmosphere,is it the same for them in the frictionless vacum of outerspace?
and then whats propelling the voyager and discovery deep space probes at around 30,000 mph for the last 30 - 40 years,when they have no rockets to keep propelling themselves at those fantastic speeds,for those incredibly long periods of time?
And what kind of man made materials and space suits are able to withstand passing through the van allen radiation belt that surrounds the earth?
And what manmade materials are able to withstand the 3 or 4 degrees above absolute zero! deep freezing temperatures of outerspace,which is 455 degrees fahrenheit below zero !?
Or,are the moon landings and our entire space program itself one huge hoax and a very massive lie? which is exactly what im beginning to lean towards these days...
and then whats propelling the voyager and discovery deep space probes at around 30,000 mph for the last 30 - 40 years,when they have no rockets to keep propelling themselves at those fantastic speeds,for those incredibly long periods of time?
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by dragonridr
Thanx for all your responses and if extreme cold is no problem at all,then what about all those films i have seen where objects are momentarily placed into near absolute zero temperatures and then pulled out and they become so cold that they shatter like glass when lightly struck against something and turn to frozen dust when crumpled in someones gloved hand,but our space craft are able, supposedly, to fly for days,weeks,months and years through those same - 455 degrees! below zero temperatures and not have the same things happen?...Sounds more than a little suspicious and very impossible to me and the voyager and discovery deep space probes are well beyond pluto by now and the suns not able to heat them up at all...
edit on 27-3-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blocula some ignorant words
Voyager 1 and its cargo of scientific equipment were designed to operate at temperatures as low as minus 31° Fahrenheit (minus 35° C). But NASA has had to turn down the thermostat again and again over the past 17 years in order to push Voyager 1 to keep working up to 2025 – far beyond its scheduled retirement date of 1989. It is now operating well below expected temperatures.