It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
No, because the all knowing, all loving and eternally omnipotent god people believe in doesn't exist.
Proof?
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by ~Vixen~
No, because the all knowing, all loving and eternally omnipotent god people believe in doesn't exist.
Proof?
How do you prove something is non existent, other than the fact it ceases to exist?
This is one of my favorite lines by theists
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
Metal Heads especially think it is 'weak' to believe in God...
well I buzz nice and loud when I go thru a metal detector but I believed in God. (pretty shocking I know)
Originally posted by satron
With proof. Euclid did it.
Originally posted by paradox
There are psycho killers who believe they are god
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
With proof. Euclid did it.
eta: better yet, can you establish any mathematical rule for God at all?edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
Originally posted by paradox
There are psycho killers who believe they are god
Atheism... enough said
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
With proof. Euclid did it.
eta: better yet, can you establish any mathematical rule for God at all?edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)
I couldn't, no.
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
With proof. Euclid did it.
eta: better yet, can you establish any mathematical rule for God at all?edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)
I couldn't, no.
Could you provide one?
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by satron
With proof. Euclid did it.
eta: better yet, can you establish any mathematical rule for God at all?edit on 3-27-12 by paradox because: (no reason given)
I couldn't, no.
EDIT: Are you defending Vixen's gnosticism?
Could you provide one?
Why don't you google it?edit on 27-3-2012 by satron because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by paradox
You could have simply said no you can't.
Originally posted by satron
If you didn't see my edit, I'll ask it again. Are you defending Vixen's gnosticism? Because they are saying something about their knowledge of God, like it's a fact.
I'd like to see some proof to their conclusion.
Are you sure that they couldn't? Are you gnostic as well?
I am my own God and blahh blahh
Originally posted by paradox
I am making a mockery of logic.
It is not logical to conclude something exists without ANY SINGLE shred of evidence EVER to conclude it exists. That is called a myth.
We would like to see proof to your conclusions, as you are the one who made the claim in the first place. We simply refuse illogical claims based on myth.
I am atheist, that is all.
I do not believe in the existence of a God, because no evidence of existence has been given in the thousands of years this myth has been perpetuated.
Could you imagine if court systems worked on the rules of theism?
What a mess
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
reply to post by paradox
we've heard it a million times man give it up...
Atheist wake up one morning and decide
I am my own God and blahh blahh
that is not really sounding too cool in a society based on theistic values and in a judgement higher than their own personal truth.
truth will destroy all!
Originally posted by satron
ftfy.
It's not logical to say something doesn't exist without proof that it doesn't.
What the heck do you think my conclusion is? I said I don't know. Are you saying I should find proof for that?
I'm liking the title of this thread even more.
Well, then quit defending the claim to knowledge, it makes atheists look pretty silly.
I don't even know where that came from. You could have just as easily had said: "Could you imagine if court systems worked on the rules of hamburgers?" Do you even know what you're talking about at this point?