It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IamCorrect
Oh, of course. Nevermind the fact that he admitted some of what he said was wrong:
"Some of my statements, mainly regarding the use of OCR software were also not 100% accurate." Source
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IamCorrect
Oh, of course. Nevermind the fact that he admitted some of what he said was wrong:
"Some of my statements, mainly regarding the use of OCR software were also not 100% accurate." Source
OK - - I read the entire post and your point is?
How many times must I state: only a certified document expert - - viewing the original birth certificate can determine any discrepancies.
No professional or even an ethical amateur graphic hobbiest would claim authenticity of a copied document. That seems to be what this man is mostly saying. He seems to be saying - Hey - I made some comments - - and others took it as absolute. Of course its not absolute.
Yes! Absolutely there can be anomalies in Photo Copying - - especially OCR. A lot depends on the equipment used and the program or programs used.
However - - the birth certificate was physically viewed and certified. And again when it was photo copied.
Originally posted by Annee
OK - - I read the entire post and your point is?
[...] Yes! Absolutely there can be anomalies in Photo Copying - - especially OCR.
Originally posted by LedaOhio
That is totally Impossible for that to happen..
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
That is totally Impossible for that to happen..
No its not.
I've seen the weirdest things happen in electronic copying/photo copying - - especially OCR.
Originally posted by LedaOhio
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
That is totally Impossible for that to happen..
No its not.
I've seen the weirdest things happen in electronic copying/photo copying - - especially OCR.
OCR does not randomly select a background.
It is "Character" recognition.. Not background recognition..
Those "random" letters you claim were strangely producing layers also used Kerning.. "the setting of two letters closer together than is usual by removing space between them."
Calling it "Strange" is beyond ridiculous. Saying "oh it is strange.. it just happens.. what a fluke!" for well known "established" functions of scanners and the software associated with it..
Layers produced of specific "Non-Existent Fonts of the time period" being their OWN LAYER is like ignoring your face is on fire.. It is that obvious..
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
That is totally Impossible for that to happen..
No its not.
I've seen the weirdest things happen in electronic copying/photo copying - - especially OCR.
OCR does not randomly select a background.
It is "Character" recognition.. Not background recognition..
Those "random" letters you claim were strangely producing layers also used Kerning.. "the setting of two letters closer together than is usual by removing space between them."
Calling it "Strange" is beyond ridiculous. Saying "oh it is strange.. it just happens.. what a fluke!" for well known "established" functions of scanners and the software associated with it..
Layers produced of specific "Non-Existent Fonts of the time period" being their OWN LAYER is like ignoring your face is on fire.. It is that obvious..
Where did I make a claim of anything except anomalies occur?
Yes - - I agreed with an article that makes sense to me because of the knowledge I have. But - again where did I claim anything except anomalies occur?
What is your personal experience to this knowledge?
Originally posted by LedaOhio
An Associates in CIS and Bachelor in CS and 30yrs experience tells me. I am also Star authorized printer and Scanner repair. I was head bench tech 8yrs at BPCS. and was a Lexis Nexis Data center infobase editor till 1996. I have have repaired and used 100's if not well into 1000's of scanners in my 30yrs behind the helm.
NEVER would an "Anomaly" occur as I described.. and again.. KERNING was not invented then and should not have been anywhere on his BC to begin with..
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
An Associates in CIS and Bachelor in CS and 30yrs experience tells me. I am also Star authorized printer and Scanner repair. I was head bench tech 8yrs at BPCS. and was a Lexis Nexis Data center infobase editor till 1996. I have have repaired and used 100's if not well into 1000's of scanners in my 30yrs behind the helm.
NEVER would an "Anomaly" occur as I described.. and again.. KERNING was not invented then and should not have been anywhere on his BC to begin with..
Very impressive. Congratulations on your education and career.
What is an Anomaly? Something abnormal or peculiar.
I know what OCR is. About 10 years ago I had to "test" several programs for a boss. Accuracy - usability - - etc.
I suppose OCR programs are far better today - then they were 10 years ago. But then accuracy was not very good. None of them were very accurate. Kind of reminds me of "smart phones" today and auto correct. It really wasn't worth it compared with the time it took to proof read the OCR copy.
Anyway - - I've worked with photo programs for about 20 years - - not exclusively as my profession. And I have seen some odd anomalies - - plus layer issues - - more then once.
Personal experience only. No degree to back it up. I'm very honest and straight forward.
However - - - along with the State of Hawaii personally viewing and certifying the birth certificate - - and my own experience with 20 years of this and that - - - I just think the Birther movement has no legitimacy.
edit on 11-3-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Siberbat
I guess I don't understand.
When I wanted a copy of my BC, I got a certified paper copy for $10. I guess if I was the President, I would have held my BC in my hand on CNN,FOX,MSNBC, NY TIMES, Washington Post, ect. and called out all the haters. Not put a digital copy on a website. lol
I think as the leader of the free world, I could have made Hawaii records dept get me what I want. I is of course I didn't have anything to hide.
See that is the issue isn't it. What is the President hiding? Why can't he do what any other American can do and just show a hard copy. I must have gotten like 5 copies of mine. It really is a trust issue. If we can't trust him on something as simple as a BC how can we trust him with our nuclear arsenal. He has shown to be a friend to Wall St. bankers and a warmonger. His only legacy has been NDAA. Oh, and bowing in submission to other world leaders. I wonder if Teddy Roosevelt would have done that? Hmm. So the man does not appear to be a man of his word. He's no FDR, Kennedy, or Reagan. Heck, Clinton did a better job at being honest than President O. That's what all of this birther stuff boils down to...TRUST!
edit on 11-3-2012 by Siberbat because: typo
Originally posted by LedaOhio
When they scan the document.. There is no need to do anything else to it.. No OCR, no optimizing, nothing..
Scan and go.. Very simple process.. To gum that process up would have to be deliberate. There must be a reason they would post such an easily debunkable fraud. Not even the worst user can mess up a scan unless he saves it somewhere and loses it.. That's about it hehe Click, scan, save.. DONE!
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LedaOhio
When they scan the document.. There is no need to do anything else to it.. No OCR, no optimizing, nothing..
Scan and go.. Very simple process.. To gum that process up would have to be deliberate. There must be a reason they would post such an easily debunkable fraud. Not even the worst user can mess up a scan unless he saves it somewhere and loses it.. That's about it hehe Click, scan, save.. DONE!
No prob - - No issues with you as person to person.
I am on a Conspiracy Forum Website - - so obviously I don't believe everything is 100% on the up and up.
However - - I have personally experienced copied documents not "behave" as they should when opened in other programs. I can only go by my own experience - - - and the fact it was physically witnessed and officially certified by Hawaii's Health Dept.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
Originally posted by LedaOhio
What they stuck their stamp on was not his original from the day of his birth.
In the United Kingdom, the terms "black" and "Asian" were used in the 1961 census to describe those who were "non-white British" nationals. Barack Obama, Sr., as a citizen of the British Colony of Kenya, would have known that his British racial designation was "black" in 1961. The term "African" was not used as a racial designation in either the colony of Kenya or on the British mainland. In South Africa and other British colonies in Africa, "Coloured" was used to describe those of mixed white-black descent.
The consensus among intelligence agency experts is that the Obama long form Certificate of Live Birth was hastily manufactured by an amateur who never thought of using the standard race designation of Negro in Barack Obama, Sr.'s racial designation block on the form either due to ignorance or an attempt to be politically correct in 2011 by refusing to use an accepted term from 1961.
Intelligence experts point out that "African" is a major clue indicating a forgery.
In 1961, the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare classified non-Whites, who were not Asian, Eskimo, Aleut, Hawaiian, part-Hawaiian, or other "non-White," as "Negro." The U.S. Census Bureau also used the term "Asian and other Pacific Islander" in 1961, which included Filipino, Hawaiian, and part-Hawaiian. The Census Bureau, like HEW, used the term "Negro" to describe blacks and those of black descent. The term "mulatto," used to describe those of mixed white and black ancestry, ceased being used by the U.S. Census Bureau in 1918.
Originally posted by LedaOhio
I can make a Computer print out of a Live-Birth as well. It means NOTHING! Face it.. It is fake!
That's not what the basket bunch says! LOL
Originally posted by LedaOhio
Maybe watch the ENTIRE Arpaio statement proving it is fake again..
Originally posted by Siberbat
I guess I don't understand.
When I wanted a copy of my BC, I got a certified paper copy for $10. I guess if I was the President, I would have held my BC in my hand on CNN,FOX,MSNBC, NY TIMES, Washington Post, ect. and called out all the haters. Not put a digital copy on a website. lol