It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TextSOLAR FLARE ALERT: A strong solar flare greater than M5.0 is currently in progress. More information to follow.
source(solarham.com...
3/10/2012 @ 17:40 UTC Sunspot 1429 Flares Again A strong solar flare is currently in progress around Sunspot 1429 on Saturday afternoon. This flare is currently at M8.0+. Stay Tuned for more information. You can also follow this website and all of the latest solar news on SolarHam Facebook by clicking "LIKE".
Because we already know this is a process that started some time ago.
source(www.earthweek.com...
tEarth’s Magnetic North Pole is shifting from its current location in northern Canada at a faster rate than has ever before been observed.
The movement could have significant impact for both aircraft navigation and some types of migratory wildlife in the decades ahead, experts warn. Hundreds of miles south of the geographic North Pole, the location of the Magnetic North Pole was first determined in 1833.
It seemed to barely move until about 1904, when its position began to track northeastward about nine miles per year. The speed began to increase significantly in a northwesterly direction about 1998, and now averages about 37 miles each year.
This means the pole will be located in northern Russia later this century if the movement and speed don’t change. Air transportation uses magnetic compass directions for navigation, meaning airports are having to rename their runways as the shift continues. Wildlife that can sense Earth’s magnetic field to migrate may also become affected by the change.
From my perspective the question is not about the proof but more about the process it self.
And anyone that claims it's not related has just about as much proof as the people who claim it is.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by diamondsmith
Ok, so my question would be, how do we know this isn't just the natural cycle of poles changing? It seems according to the data that this happens quite slowly and that a instant reversal is highly unlikely or impossible, without some sort of outside influence.
I tend to be very skeptical of things we know very little about and only have small historical data pools to pull our theories from. In this case, we don't have that much history of what the polls looked like millions of years ago, or thousands of years ago ( other than again, educated guesses based on our current understanding of them) in order to make these important claims.
~Tenth
Maybe this happen in arithmetic regression(progression) as cycles,
Ok, so my question would be, how do we know this isn't just the natural cycle of poles changing? It seems according to the data that this happens quite slowly and that a instant reversal is highly unlikely or impossible, without some sort of outside influence.
source(en.wikipedia.org...
A geomagnetic reversal is a change in the Earth's magnetic field such that the positions of magnetic north and magnetic south are interchanged. The Earth's field has alternated between periods of normal polarity, in which the direction of the field was the same as the present direction, and reverse polarity, in which the field was in the opposite direction. These periods are called chrons. The time spans of chrons are randomly distributed with most being between 0.1 and 1 million years. Most reversals are estimated to take between 1,000 and 10,000 years. The latest one, the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal, occurred 780,000 years ago. Brief disruptions that do not result in reversal are called geomagnetic excursions.
From geological perspective I think there is proof,from the Sun - Science & Space perspective there is no recorded data in terms of millions of years.
I tend to be very skeptical of things we know very little about and only have small historical data pools to pull our theories from.
source(en.wikipedia.org...
In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that rocks with reversed fields were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[1][2] Three decades later, when Earth's magnetic field was better understood, theories were advanced suggesting that the Earth's field might have reversed in the remote past. Most paleomagnetic research in the late 1950s included an examination of the wandering of the poles and continental drift. Although it was discovered that some rocks would reverse their magnetic field while cooling, it became apparent that most magnetized volcanic rocks preserved traces of the Earth's magnetic field at the time the rocks had cooled. In the absence of reliable methods for obtaining absolute ages for rocks, it was thought that reversals occurred approximately every million years.[1][2]
Not the CME's equally cyclical,more the 11 year cycle which had to result in reversal of magnetic poles of the sun, which didn't happened yet what can lead us to the abstract conclusion that flares and CME's from the sun can be the result of this delay coupled with a higher cycle of the sun and random factors indefinite context.
I suppose it could be possible if the CME's are equally cyclical .. but I just don't think that's the case.
Statistical analysis of one version of the magnetic reversal record suggests that the frequency of reversals has changed cyclically with a period of 30 Myr starting at least 165 Myr ago. But factors other than periodicity affect the analysis used and here I show that there is no compelling evidence for periodicity in the reversal record. The results of essentially identical analyses that have been applied to other geolocial data should also be re-evaluated.
Can be called this way the problem is if they will repeat and mental break which did not happen that something can not happen.
I call this the Aurora conspiracy. Oh look at the lights but the currents vibrating through capacitor Earth are there 24/7 and the light show is just an overload.
It's the Sun's influence on Earth which is visible now days as in the past,the strong flares and CME's from the Sun could be the cause for Earth's magnetic poles reversal in the millions of years history.
The Earth's influence on the Sun is quite insignificant. Our magnetic field doesn't even reach the Sun, so how could a geomagnetic reversal on Earth affect the Sun?
The know something I am sure of that and they have scientific data but it is difficult to make accurate long term measurements as long as the data changes from day to day.
What they do not know is that a physical is the cause of a magnetic pole reversal. If they did know they would say so. If they knew the source of the magnetism they would say a physical flip had to occur. Thus we are working with wizards and captive minds that can't come close to telling us out of fear of reprisals in the scientific dictatorship