It was a crystal clear night. The moon was full and the temperature was very mild. I was out trying to make some art photographs capturing this
gorgeous night and beautiful big full moon.
The night was perfectly clear without a cloud in the sky.
As I was shooting some annoying planes started flying by making huge contrails…
Time 8:43 – start of contrail formation
What was odd was there were others out planes not making contrails, but the atmosphere is very dynamic and one part of it can make them and others not
so I didn’t think much of it…
…yet they kept coming - there were planes every direction I looked, easily 12 or more making these contrails and half a dozen others not making any
lasting contrails. I had never seen so many planes at one time in this area.
Then they started making patterns.
The sky started getting very hazy and as the contrails spread out.
Time: 9:04 – sky covered with contrails
These planes first started entering my shots at 8:43 and I abandoned trying to shoot because the sky was riddled with contrails by 9:08…. So within
20 minutes it went from perfectly clear to a crisscrossed mess of persistent contrails.
I came in and took a screen shot of the planes on the radar.
There were a lot more planes flying than were on the radar. The ones that were not making the spreading contrails show on the radar, the ones that
were making the spreading contrails are not shown.
Here is a Stellarium screen shot I took that shows the direction I was shooting it… I only thought to take this 40 minutes later so the moon is a
little higher and more to the South than in my shots.
This is proof positive there are planes making persistent contrails that are not on the radar.
I cannot prove these contrails are geoengineering. But it is highly suggestive to me given the circumstances.
I was not out to capture these photos… these planes intruded on my photo shoot of a beautiful night. I was shooting in RAW so I have 100 percent
proof positive there is no fakery.
Also Checking NOAA’s weather balloon data the conditions were not present for the formation of contrails, the relative humidity in the 50's at the
The relative humidity data from the RUC 40km model are suspect since 18 April, 2002. Forecasts since April 18, 2002 are suspect. To obtain a
better estimate of potential contrail formation, examine the 'Individual level (mb)' results. Select a pressure value between 200 and 250 mb for the
best estimate. Relative humidity values above 80% are good indicators of contrails in the new RUC data. You can use any pressure level , but the large
values may be too warm for contrail formation.
Raw data from 20k-30k feet:
I’m sure the traditional Deny Everything group will be along shortly. But look at the evidence for yourself. I was facing pretty much east by south
east for all these shots. It only took 20 minutes for them to cover the entire sky in crisscross patterns. Conditions were not right for contrail
Here is a nice easy way to see: put the relative humidity between 20-56 percent as the data shows, then click "fly" and you will see the exact
contrails the 3-6 non-persistent contrail planes were leaving. The 12 or so planes spreading these huge persistent contrails are off the chart well
over 100 percent humidity on that applet... conditions that WERE NOT present.
Java applet showing conditions for contrail formation.