It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bachmann: ‘Not Far-Fetched’ to Say Obama Could Limit Insurance Coverage to 2 Babies Per Family

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:45 AM
link   
Bachmann: ‘Not Far-Fetched’ to Say Obama Could Limit Insurance Coverage to 2 Babies Per Family

Michele Bachmann said on a Glenn Beck interview that Obama and Co. could eventually limit couples to 2 babies !!

Maybe with the way current and future administrations operate it's not that far fetched.

They do seem to change their minds from time to time.

Perhaps Michele is "seeing" into the future ?

Other countries have limits in some areas
and maybe a liberal agenda someday could impose this concept right here in the good 'ol USA.

Maybe a "health care dictator" could just order insurance companies to comply
and impose fines for people who violate any directives.

She claims the "authority" may already be available !!



(CNSNews.com) - The problem with Obamacare? "There's nothing that this president -- one person -- would be limited from doing," including possibly limiting the number of children a couple decides to have, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said.

In a Tuesday night interview on Glenn Beck TV's “Real News From The Blaze,” Bachmann noted that "what the government gives, the government can take away.”

"It certainly isn’t beyond the pale to think, in light of Kathleen Sebelius, the Health and Human Services secretary -- she said that it’s important that we have contraceptives because that prevents pregnancy, and pregnancy is more expensive to the federal government.

“Going with that logic, according to our own Health and Human Services secretary, it isn’t far-fetched to think that the president of the United States could say, ‘We need to save health care expenses — the federal government will only pay for one baby to be born in the hospital per family, or two babies to be born per family.’ That could happen. We think it couldn’t?”

Baby Limits ?




posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:53 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 

Scary.
Orwellian.

Plausible?

Maybe.

(One word sentences rock!
)



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:56 AM
link   
More peddling of fear that has zero basis in reality. Bachmann is an idiot; I know it, you know it and the American people know it.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:57 AM
link   
Why would anybody take anything this woman says seriously? Saying crazy stuff is pretty much what she is known for. The worst part a small part of the popultion is dumb enough to buy anything.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:58 AM
link   
This. Is SO stupid. I'm really have no words to describe my utter distaste about this lowest-level-defamation.


Someone THINKS that this or that might be done and *BAM* it is 90% factuous?
Nothing but



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 06:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Muttley2012
More peddling of fear that has zero basis in reality. Bachmann is an idiot; I know it, you know it and the American people know it.


Ya but.....

She's an elected member of the U.S. House of Representatives !!

Don't you think Obama is "thinking" about this ?

Or how 'bout the HHS Secretary Kathleen Sillybus ?



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrSpad
Why would anybody take anything this woman says seriously? Saying crazy stuff is pretty much what she is known for. The worst part a small part of the popultion is dumb enough to buy anything.


I wonder if Kathleen Sebelius or that healthcare panel suggested it.

Or what if Nancy Pelosi gets this bright idea ?

What would people think then.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:02 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Bachman sees the future with those "bats#!+" crazy eyes?
If she could she would probably not run for President while being married to a gay man!
Beezer, it figures you mwould be here first trolling Evry Obama thread.
I sense another birther thread being written, better hurry.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

...could eventually....

Maybe...

Perhaps....

...maybe...

Maybe....


Speculate much?


Since threads based upon pure (misinformed) speculation are now a trend, let me do the same:

Bachman is a lunatic who can apparently read the President's mind....


Perhaps, you might consider refraining from displaying your huge Obamaphobia in over 800 posts here, or consider seeking professional help about your obsession with the President.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by XyZeR

Originally posted by xuenchen

...could eventually....

Maybe...

Perhaps....

...maybe...

Maybe....


Speculate much?


Since threads based upon pure (misinformed) speculation are now a trend, let me do the same:

Bachman is a lunatic who can apparently read the President's mind....


Perhaps, you might consider refraining from displaying your huge Obamaphobia in over 800 posts here, or consider seeking professional help about your obsession with the President.






I see we are striking nerves.

But you really should refrain from mis-quotes.

But now that you mention it, Bachmann might be a lunatic.

What has Obama done for YOU lately anyway ?



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:21 AM
link   
china has a one child policy
the eugenecists who fund Obama are generationaly just down stream from the eugenecists that installed mao
they own the insurance companies that wrote Obama's health care bill...

incidentally where does bachman get her campaign money?

Bachmann's husband got $137,000 in Medicaid fund

www.msnbc.msn.com...


At least eight of the individual contributors listed in the Bachmann campaign FEC disclosure statement are alleged to be members of the secretive Council For National Policy (CNP). The word “alleged” is used because the CNP will not make its membership list public; its regular meetings are also closed to the public.

The CNP claims that it is an educational group, but the activities of its influential membership indicate that it is devoted to 1) capturing local political party organizations and offices and 2) reforming the U.S.

www.thebachmannrecord.com...

this is whats called a TRIAL BALLON
just to see what kind of reaction there will be and to open the public up to the concept
it was in the MMGW crowds plan all along

just go vist the bill gates vaccination threads and read his quotes.
oh hell you are prolly slow so here I'll do it for you
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

etc


edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: jeez beez thats two stars in one day

edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: fixed quote box twice lol



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:32 AM
link   
Bachmann and Beck. Yeah I would certainly take anything these geniuses said as absolute gospel. Really? This was the best you could find for today? So disappointed.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:46 AM
link   
farfetched?...looney?

NEW YORK CITY RELEASES 2010 ABORTION DATA;
LITTLE PROGRESS FROM PREVIOUS YEAR
City Pregnancies Ending in Abortion 40%, Down from 41% in 2009
48% in the Bronx and 60% Among African-Americans, Same as in 2009

hosted.verticalresponse.com...
blackgenocide.org...

the ball is already in play
and while you are at the site above read the perday abortion rate for blacks and how planned parenthood
wants MORE!

African genocide: Planned Parenthood to ramp up African ‘abortion services’ by 82%

www.lifesitenews.com...


edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 07:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 


Good information Danbones.

Sounds like an agenda is in play !

(at least we are seeing some intelligent responses once in a while !)



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
I see we are striking nerves.

We...? are you suffering from schizophrenia or something ? That sure would explain a lot!


But you really should refrain from mis-quotes.

Nice try at backseat moderating btw
I just highlighted the speculative portions of your posts, which was,...well all of it really, i never misquoted you, there wasn't any message you were trying to relay in the first place apart from the "OBAMA=BAAAAAAD" meme.



But now that you mention it, Bachmann might be a lunatic

So , you admit to turning the speculations of a possible LUNATIC in your head into facts that somehow warrant a thread (because it fits neatly into your raging case of Obama phobia?)... and you honestly don't see a problem with this practice...?
are there even any mods left on ATS i wonder?

Better yet, you seem to marvel at the idea that you are somehow " striking nerves",
Yeah .....I admit, blatant displays of STUPIDITY have always gotten on my nerve,
So i guess congratulations are in order! You must be so proud.

The ATS best trolling thread of the year award goes to...



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by XyZeR
 


Well, I suppose some Obama support would be warranted.

It seems most Obamamites can't make any sense out of the agendas either.

I was hoping you could help.

All I see is ...... well not much.

How would you explain all the missing money if you had to ?



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by XyZeR
 


Well, I suppose some Obama support would be warranted.

It seems most Obamamites can't make any sense out of the agendas either.

I was hoping you could help.

All I see is ...... well not much.

How would you explain all the missing money if you had to ?


I seriously don't know what half of that post is supposed to be? what agenda's?? Do you mean the one you constantly make up from the delusional ramblings of the likes of Bachman and other right wing extremists?


All I see is not much
Duh, that was very clear to me.

and...What missing money are you going on about??? this thread you started was about Obama coming after your babies!!!... Are you trying to change the subject now because someone called you out?

The really funny thing is that i'm not an "Obamanite" at all, just someone who can actually accept the reality (FYI i'm not a US resident...) something some people here clearly are incapable of.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   
reply to post by XyZeR
 


I would also think you would comment on the possibility of baby limits.

With the "forced" coverage of contraceptives being debated, and given the popularity of contraceptives today,
perhaps the next "logical" step by the Obamamites (in their minds at least) would be baby limits ?

What do ya think ?

For it ? and why.

Against it ? and why.

I personally am against it.

Individuals should be able to exercise "Individualism" in a free society.
(and of course, be responsible)



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


I'dd really debate you, if you would demonstrate the capability to do so. Alas...

Anyone can have a different opinion from me for all I care, but they have to bring some valid arguments into a discussion to persuade me of their viewpoint, so far i have not seen 1 solid argument from the cabal of Obamaphobiacs here on ATS about why they hate him so much (apart from: but he's black...)

Bogus Birth certificate Bull#
Accusations of Obama beeing a socialist marxist (who then bailed out the banks, go figure!)
Accusations of him Beign a closet muslim, with Not ONE single shred of evidence pointing towards that just a continual torrent of made up pseudo arguments and very low attacks.
"Obama just wants to destroy Amirikkaaaaaaa!!!" He's doing a #ty job if that what you believe.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:54 AM
link   
its all aboout eugenics
hard NOT to see it
the birth control
the abortions
forced sterilization
vaccines
GMO caused sterility, and starvation

well OK
its EASY to not see it all you have to do is: not look

"I said DON"T LOOK ETHEL!
but it was to late, she had already NOT LOOKED!" - paraphrase of the streak by Ray Steavens



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join