Secular increase of the astronomical unit and perihelion precessions as tests of the Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati multi-dimensional braneworld scenario
Lorenzo Iorio JCAP09(2005)006 doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/09/006
PDF (313 KB) | HTML | References | Articles citing this article
Viale Unità di Italia 68, 70125, Bari, Italy
Abstract. An unexpected secular increase of the astronomical unit, the length scale of the Solar System, has recently been reported by three different research groups (Krasinsky and Brumberg, Pitjeva, Standish). The latest JPL measurements amount to 7 ± 2 m cy−1. At present, there are no explanations able to accommodate such an observed phenomenon, either in the realm of classical physics or in the usual four-dimensional framework of the Einsteinian general relativity. The Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati braneworld scenario, which is a multi-dimensional model of gravity aimed at providing an explanation of the observed cosmic acceleration without dark energy, predicts, among other things, a perihelion secular shift, due to Lue and Starkman, of 5 × 10−4 arcsec cy−1 for all the planets of the Solar System. It yields a variation of about 6 m cy−1 for the Earth–Sun distance which is compatible with the observed rate of change for the astronomical unit. The recently measured corrections to the secular motions of the perihelia of the inner planets of the Solar System are in agreement with the predicted value of the Lue–Starkman effect for Mercury, Mars and, at a slightly worse level, the Earth.
Within the Newtonian framework, we considered the action of a circular massive ring modeling the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt of Trans-Neptunian Objects, but it does not induce secular variations of e. In principle, a viable candidate would be a putative trans-Plutonian massive object (PlanetX/Nemesis/Tyche), recently revamped to accommodate certain features of the architecture of the Kuiper belt and of the distribution of the comets in the Oort cloud, since it would cause a non-vanishing long-term variation of the eccentricity.Actually, the values for its mass and distance needed to explain the empirically determined increase of the lunar eccentricity would be highly unrealistic and in contrast with the most recent viable theoretical scenarios for the existence of such a body. For example, a terrestrial-sized body should be located at just 30 au, while an object with the mass of Jupiter should be at 200 au.
For example, a terrestrial-sized body should be located at just 30 au, while an object with the mass of Jupiter should be at 200 au.
Originally posted by amongus
Originally posted by Wolfenz
reply to post by amongus
Remote Viewing love the Subject the Wireless Connection of the Mind From the 3 Zones Past Present Future Scanning , Mediums etc.. That used that 3rd EYE Pineal Gland does Wonders, Works for Some
if you Able to Enter the in between of your Conscious & Subconscious Mind a Few can do it ..
One of the Biggest Government Research On Both Sides of the Cold War...
Especially they Love to take Children for their RV Testing ..
Dr Ruth ??
Shouldn't you reply to the OP? I don't get why you replied to me.....I'm a RV'er myself, and believer.
We? Plenty of resources here on ATS about remote viewing. Hundreds actually.
Originally posted by primoaurelius
Can someone please answer me this, asked before but got no response. Look for my other post on pg 11 or 12 for more.
When a new star forms inside a nebula, the solar wind blows a sphere around it, blowing away the gas and dust and creating it's heliosphere. Our sun also has a heliosphere, all the way out to the oort cloud, and solar wind that is supposed to keep certain crap out (gas and dust). How would the solar wind effect this energy cloud and what is thedifference between this energy cloud and a nebula. To call it an energy cloud and not some scientific name like supermassive ionized gassous jet (or some other sciency name lol) suggests to me a lack of credibility, or does it have a scientific name? Where did this cloud come from, how did it come into existence. To me it sounds like a small nebula, but that's why I'm asking questions. Is it visible to anyone other than remote viewers?
But most importantly what about the heliosphere and the solar wind, how will it effect this cloud, and if it won't effect this cloud, why not? Like I said, solar winds blow around nebulas, what is the difference between this cloud and a nebula.edit on 8-3-2012 by primoaurelius because: Grammer, I'm not perfect