It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was asking you as a skeptic to provide a separate explanation. Hence why I listed those things as a possibility.
I ask again what are your creds to make said judgement. If you want to call someone out for not having 'scientifical' evidence , the provide proof that states you are qualified to make said determination.
I tried being peaceful and I tried playing nice. It seems however we end up back at this point. .
I challenge you to provide the data that remote viewing is a fraud.
Where is your first hand experience with the subject?
Names and telephone numbers of the scientist who ran the same experiments ran at Stanford?
(please note this is an inquiry into your scientific research. You should know why this is asked. If you do not, well I have proved my point)
The separate objective scientist results?
I read it in X, and they are reputable
Mama told me
My preacher told me
God told me
Their is no such thing as psi ability
It says right here in X
I am asking for scientific proof of your statement. You have failed to prove you have any rudimentary knowledge of the subject. You have also demonstrated the inability to question your surroundings in a scientific manner.
Good sir either post the proof multiple other scientist running the same test that stanford ran and their results, or by not doing so you admit we are right and you are
Fakes and frauds exist everywhere both in various believers and in skeptics. Can you guess which community has more frauds?
15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered from this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.
The Pseudo-Skeptics can blindly and gullibly recite about the existence of this challenge and there being no takers of the prize as "proof" that no paranormal phenomenon exists, but like unquestioning Religious Fundamentalists, I doubt many if any of them have actually read their holy book / challenge in whole to actually know what they are actually talking about and what the text is actually saying/suggesting.
In this case, it appears to be impossible to win by any stretch of the imagination, and it seems to be completely in the subjective biased judgements of JREF- James Randi Educational Foundation. Not trustable or reliable at all. It eliminates many potentially testable areas for no reliable reason, and even suggests that they can eliminate even more at their own subjective discernment.
So much for "seeking the truth", but Pseudo-Skeptics obviously don't care to get to the bottom of things and actually find the truth, they just don't want these things to be true!
8 The second angel sounded, and something like a great mountain burning with fire was thrown into the sea; and a third of the sea became blood.
The nations of the world need to work together to develop a warning and communication system that could mitigate the worst effects of a catastrophic asteroid strike, a new report stresses. Such a system would issue international warnings about possible impending strikes and educate the public about the threats posed by near-Earth objects. It also would call government leaders' and the public's attention to the scientific value and potential economic importance of asteroids.source
Originally posted by Imtor
If you actually used your brain, all who call asteroid impact this year possible - something that would have been seen in the sky as a new object, you would do better. Not being certain at all and barely even possible means, you would have seen it youtself from the northern or southern hemisphere, Just like the cometh was seen in 2007 near Perseus.
If you mean some meteor that can make a crater and has diameter not more than 1 tall building, yes such can happen but they do not cause climate change. A climate change could occur if it was aroun 500 km in diameter.
instead you threaten and attempt to bully
Imagine having the remote viewing session BEFORE the targets, or the remote viewers assigned....!
The sstem must work to achieve its statistical results....
The fact that the MORE RVrs that view a target, can actually supply additional data, as well as confirm the others data, means it works......