It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013

page: 39
56
<< 36  37  38    40  41  42 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Dr. Courtney Brown discusses how Farsight Organization utilizes scientific methods, applies science to RV and that all data which provides proof of RV success are available at no charge at the Farsight Org website.


edit on 11-6-2012 by AlchemicalMonocular because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 11:20 AM
link   
The Farsight group claims success even when it is a huge failure. Their spraying hose on Mars claim is a whopping failure. Independent data such as the high res images taken from the orbiter show that there is no active spraying hose.

Once again Farsight shows itself to be a typical RV group - illustrating how self deluded a group can be.



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 11:24 AM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


I'm not to clued up on Remote Viewing what is it??



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Once again the vacuous claims of science involved in RV. This is not science. It does not look like science. It does not act like science. This is not scientific in any way or form and no matter how often RVers pretend it is scientific it is not.



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 11:43 AM
link   
Here are people that have gone off the deep end with this Farsight fairy tale.

www.marsanomalyresearch.com...
jszostak.webs.com...

Then there are sane people

blog.chron.com...
www.universetoday.com...



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


What are these RV guys all about I like this from the universe today link.


Anyway, these folks say they can even tell that there are artificial structures at this site with a laboratory. What’s more they can see that there are lifeforms there wearing uniforms, and there are more men than women


What total and utter BS



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 12:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shminkee Pinkee
reply to post by rebellender
 


I'm not to clued up on Remote Viewing what is it??


Deluded people who calim they can see a place or object without being there, then when you ask them to prove that they will give a variety of vauge answers of which if even 1 in a 1000 is ALMOST right then thats proof



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Dr. Dean Radin's live chat with the famous RV site Ten Thousand Roads is now online and can be downloaded.

Chat Transcript


I can play golf, but no amount of practice will ever make me as good as Tiger Woods. For the folks reading this chat, the likelihood is that you already have some talent, otherwise you wouldn't be interested in this topic and pursuing it seriously. But without talent and interest, I'm not sure there's a magic pill that will transform you into a super-psychic (although I've written a screenplay about this concept). About becoming more psychic: There are good reasons *not* to want to become highly psychic, because it carries a price. Super-sensitivity for some people is extremely disturbing. At extreme levels it can drive you nuts. So what we want is to turn it on and off at will, and that's where some native talent can help



Palyne_Gaenir: Do you see the scientific community at large beginning to accept that there
is in fact repeatable psi effects?

Dr._Dean_Radin: Privately and quietly, yes. Publicly, no. It's still very dangerous for one's
academic career to merely mention interest in this area. The academic situation is better
in the UK than most other countries. In the US it is paradoxically the kiss of death among
your peers but the public (and studies.



"We are well past the point of asking much less needing practical science to embrace Remote Viewing. It has done so even if reluctantly. anyone who challenges Remote Viewing's scientific basis, it's well established accuracy and its usefulness is retarded".



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by AlchemicalMonocular
 



We are well past the point of asking much less needing practical science to embrace Remote Viewing. It has done so even if reluctantly. anyone who challenges Remote Viewing's scientific basis, it's well established accuracy and its usefulness is retarded

This was not on the linked page, nor in the PDF.

So where did this come from? I doubt this came from Radin. That is not the manner in which he speaks. Rather it seems to be a quote from someone who is a loud mouth that has fallen for the delusion of RV. It is not accurate. It is a failure. It is not scientific.

Were there any established accuracy metrics or studies they would have been posted by now.



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 06:31 PM
link   
For those who are Project Camelot fans, Dr. Courtney Brown will be on a LiveStream broadcast with Kerry "Ms. Ja-Ja-Jaguar" Cassidy 13June Wed 2012.

Dr. Brown - Camelot



posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 06:35 PM
link   
the girls will stop EVA !!!!






posted on Jun, 11 2012 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by AlchemicalMonocular
 


So where did that "retarded" quote come from?

When it comes to RV I expect ridiculous statements to be made about it being scientific
and it being accurate
.

So is this just more pretend fluff the world of RV?



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 04:48 AM
link   
reply to post by wmd_2008
 


Oh I see, Psychic Mumbo Jumbo :-)



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 04:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shminkee Pinkee
reply to post by rebellender
 


I'm not to clued up on Remote Viewing what is it??


People just making stuff up



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 06:41 AM
link   
The debunkers here and pseudosceptics are lost


No evidence?

Maybe to start you should differentiate between Intelligence/Military era RV and public dissemination era.

There's legit evidence from the former. Latter just muddies the waters and that's irresistible for debunkers and pseudosceptics.
edit on 12-6-2012 by uesvaje because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 06:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by uesvaje
The debunkers here and pseudosceptics are lost


No evidence?

Maybe to start you should differentiate between Intelligence/Military era RV and public dissemination era.

There's legit evidence from the former. Latter just muddies the waters and that's irresistible for debunkers and pseudosceptics.
edit on 12-6-2012 by uesvaje because: (no reason given)


Well lets see a great example of the former BUT I wont hold my breath



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 09:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by uesvaje
There's legit evidence from the former.


So how about showing us this "legit evidence" then!



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by uesvaje
The debunkers here and pseudosceptics are lost


Well, yes, but they are so cute and adorable like little bunny rabbits!

And about as smart too!



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 11:18 AM
link   
It is not surprising that the RV believers have nothing of value to tell us other than to belittle those that ask for evidence for their claims. When asked to produce anything to substantiate claims of lots of evidence all we get are testimonials and anecdotes.



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 11:40 AM
link   
This has been posted on past threads on ATS on RV and/or ESP, but seems sparse and not consistently posted.

Jessica Utts is an academic statistician from UC Davis who in her conclusion thinks Remote Viewing and ESP has merits.

This is a well known white paper on the topic by her

anson.ucdavis.edu/~utts/air2.html

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE FOR PSYCHIC FUNCTIONING

Professor Jessica Utts
Division of Statistics
University of California, Davis


ABSTRACT

Research on psychic functioning, conducted over a two decade period, is examined to determine whether or not the phenomenon has been scientifically established. A secondary question is whether or not it is useful for government purposes. The primary work examined in this report was government sponsored research conducted at Stanford Research Institute, later known as SRI International, and at Science Applications International Corporation, known as SAIC.

Using the standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established. The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is expected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted. Effects of similar magnitude to those found in government-sponsored research at SRI and SAIC have been replicated at a number of laboratories across the world. Such consistency cannot be readily explained by claims of flaws or fraud.

The magnitude of psychic functioning exhibited appears to be in the range between what social scientists call a small and medium effect. That means that it is reliable enough to be replicated in properly conducted experiments, with sufficient trials to achieve the long-run statistical results needed for replicability.

A number of other patterns have been found, suggestive of how to conduct more productive experiments and applied psychic functioning. For instance, it doesn't appear that a sender is needed. Precognition, in which the answer is known to no one until a future time, appears to work quite well. Recent experiments suggest that if there is a psychic sense then it works much like our other five senses, by detecting change. Given that physicists are currently grappling with an understanding of time, it may be that a psychic sense exists that scans the future for major change, much as our eyes scan the environment for visual change or our ears allow us to respond to sudden changes in sound.

It is recommended that future experiments focus on understanding how this phenomenon works, and on how to make it as useful as possible. There is little benefit to continuing experiments designed to offer proof, since there is little more to be offered to anyone who does not accept the current collection of data.




top topics



 
56
<< 36  37  38    40  41  42 >>

log in

join