It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
twenty years of government funding with each year having to prove the units capabilities
And yes you do. You claim X ...
I stand by statements sir. You do need to practice an attempt to do at least a few sessions before you can claim what you are saying.
In fact I have a target just for you
I do not want, nor Have I solicited, your personal information ... I asked you to put up proof or your skills or be quiet... Are you a scientist, what experiments have you ran? ect... Please post where I asked for your name, address, phone number, or ISP address...
if you are a professional of some sort the profession your in is not personal it is general...
Again you have been respectfully asked to provide proof you are not a nutcase debunker ...
The government funded it for a long time... each year they got funding... is but one aspect of proof
You however have not backed up your claims, you have just made claims. Actually you do have to do the fieldwork to challenge those in that field.
You have no skills to make the claims your are making...
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Lil Drummerboy
To suppose that everyone is different would be kind of a normal thing don't you think? Not everyone can run a 4 minute mile, but some do. Not everyone can swim the English channel, but some do. So if RV works, then there might be some that can do it and others not.
Fine. Where is the evidence that some can do it?
I do understand that the waters get muddied with all sorts of people pretending to be able to do something. I believe there are many people that report sightings of UFOs, cryptos, and whatever that made it hard to find the truth in these issues.
Supposing that we can get past these trouble makers that pretend to be war veterans or financial investment smartie pans or RV able people, etc., where are the genuine people and what testing have they passed?
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
Maybe those that truly are correct never really see the light of day so to speak. Do you believe our government is 100% honest with everything? thank you for viewing my perspective.edit on 5-6-2012 by Lil Drummerboy because: smiles for stereo
Maybe those that truly are correct never really see the light of day so to speak.
And, of course, when the military quit funding RV after 20+ years, RV for the purpose of national security was simply thrown away.
Originally posted by dazsmith
Daz Smith is the person I communicated with for about a year. He is so self deluded it is incredible. He is one of the people that did an RV on a stationary mark on Mars and claimed it was an active project with aliens squirting some sort of a hose. Daz is also the person that claimed that energetic and rhythmic was a good description of a tornado. The guy is crackers. He really, really believes that dry and musical is an appropriate description for Arkansas. I kid you not.
LOL, just like on the other forum, yet again you are incorrect.
In the target you mentioned which I did as part of a BLIND remote viewing experiment. The target turned out to be a Tornado. In my 20 or so pages of data I said the target is a tornado, sketched it and described it. Yet you in you inability to accept the obvious - grasp one or two of my descriptive words from all these pages of data in hope of saying I was off target - you dont mention my sketches of movement interacting with man made structure or that I said this target is a TORNADO, in session.
dont take my word for it the RV sessions are here - see for yourselves: [SNIP]
Remote Viewing has been tested to death. Tested and evaluated for over 20 years by the top labs in the U.S, repeatedly given budgets to continue yera on years for over 23 years by the intel, government and congress - do you really think they did this if it dindt work. No to mention that every year the programs went through, scientific oversights committees, congressional oversight committees, human use oversight committees. There are millions or recorded double blind remote viewing trila on record showing an effect above the norm - yet you and all your qualifications and supreme knowledge of science claim that all this was wrong, all these scientists were wrong and that you are right and that there is nothing to it.
Now, ummm who has the most credibility here - science and a project/research funded for over 23 years continuously, showing results year on year - or you with your closed mind?
But above all get your fact right and dont put words into my mouth.
All the best...